User talk:Huntster
Add topic|
|
Request to blur poem on a recent Library of Congress photo.
[edit]You blurred this file File:Europa Clipper commemorative plate.jpg. I just uploaded a similar file from the Library of Congress Life Flickr website. Can you please blur my upload for the same reasons here: File:Poet Laureate Ada Limón watches the Europa Clipper lift off from Kennedy Space Center in Cape Canaveral, Florida, October 14, 2024 - 12.jpg and rev del the original upload. Thank you for your time. -- Ooligan (talk) 04:16, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- @Ooligan: Done! — Huntster (t @ c) 06:28, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- @Huntster - Thank you for sharing some of your valuable time and helping with my request. Respectfully, -- Ooligan (talk) 06:42, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
Revert to Category:United States space logos
[edit]I didn't know there was a "United States space." can you tell me exactly what part of space that is? Category:United States space doesn't exist for a reason. There obviously can't be logos for something that doesn't exist as a concept to begin with. I get it that some of the logos weren't NASA related, but the answer to that is putting the few that weren't in categories that actually make sense instead of pretending like space is owned by or has anything to do with the United States when it doesn't. Adamant1 (talk) 03:30, 9 March 2025 (UTC)
- You're not wrong, the category was poorly named (though the obvious connotation is "United States-related space logos" or "United States space exploration logos"), but the answer is also not shunting them all into a blatantly wrong category. I've upmerged them into Category:Space exploration logos. — Huntster (t @ c) 03:42, 9 March 2025 (UTC)
- That's fair. I had planned on going through to double check if there's better categories for the images but am busy IRL for the rest of the night. I'll do it tomorrow though. --Adamant1 (talk) 03:49, 9 March 2025 (UTC)
Urgent admin help needed
[edit]Hello,
please check whether File:Naked large areolas and tits of an indian woman.jpg is the same file that got treated in Commons:Deletion requests/File:Large areolas and breasts of a woman.jpg. If yes, then TheEPYCKid may be subject of an indef block for harassment, if I'm not mistaken. Regards, Grand-Duc (talk) 02:10, 19 May 2025 (UTC)
- @Grand-Duc: In the future, please post such things to the Admin Noticeboard. I've deleted the file in question, but I have zero knowledge of the background of this situation and the material on Reddit has been deleted, so I cannot really make such a judgement. — Huntster (t @ c) 02:34, 19 May 2025 (UTC)
- Well, I tried to minimise the public visibility of the case and this looked for an admin in the recent changes. My idea was that some admin could have checked whether File:Large areolas and breasts of a woman.jpg is the same as File:Naked large areolas and tits of an indian woman.jpg. If that's the case, then the uploader of the latter is most definitively trolling, I think. Regards, Grand-Duc (talk) 02:38, 19 May 2025 (UTC)
Sorry about that! Thanks for correcting this. It was caught up in a big move of photos of Earth landscapes that had been placed in the Category:Surface features of bodies of the Solar System mainly by Bots. Best, --Cart (talk) 21:59, 14 August 2025 (UTC)
- @W.carter: No worries! I moved several around that I found. Yeah, bots have been poorly categorizing things as of late, lots of images thrown into top-level categories like "Solar System" and "Telescopes". — Huntster (t @ c) 22:17, 14 August 2025 (UTC)
- Yep, and sorting them doesn't get any easier when the Atacama desert looks every bit like photos of asteroids or Mars. ;-) --Cart (talk) 22:22, 14 August 2025 (UTC)