Commons:Quality images candidates

Shortcut

• COM:QIC

↓ Skip to nominations ↓

These are the candidates for becoming quality images. This is not the same thing as featured pictures. If you want informal feedback on your photos, please ask at Commons:Photography critiques.

Purpose

The purpose of quality images is to encourage the people that are the foundation of Commons, the individual users who provide the unique images that expand this collection. While featured pictures identifies the absolute best of all the images loaded into Commons, Quality images sets out to identify and encourage users’ efforts in providing quality images to Commons. Additionally, quality images should be a place to refer other users to when explaining methods for improving an image.

Guidelines

All nominated images should be the work of Commons users.

For nominators

Below are the general guidelines for Quality images; more detailed criteria are available at Image guidelines.

Image page requirements

1. Copyright status. Quality image candidates have to be uploaded to Commons under a suitable license. The full license requirements are at Commons:Copyright tags.
2. Images should comply with all Commons policies and practices, including Commons:Photographs of identifiable people.
3. Quality images shall have a meaningful file name, be properly categorized and have an accurate description on the file page in one or more languages. It is preferred, but not mandatory, to include an English description.
4. No advertisements or signatures in image. Copyright and authorship information of quality images should be located on the image page and may be in the image metadata, but should not interfere with image contents.

Creator

Proposed wording changes to specifically exclude AI generate media from being eligable for QI see discussion

Pictures must have been created by a Wikimedian in order to be eligible for QI status. This means that pictures from, for example, Flickr are ineligible unless the photographer is a Commons user. (Note that Featured Pictures do not have this requirement.) Photographical reproductions of two-dimensional works of art, made by Wikimedians, are eligible (and should be licensed PD-old according to the Commons guidelines). If an image is promoted despite not being the creation of a Wikimedian, the QI status should be removed as soon as the mistake is detected.

Technical requirements

More detailed criteria are available at Commons:Image guidelines.

Resolution

Bitmapped images (JPEG, PNG, GIF, TIFF) should normally have at least 2 megapixels; reviewers may demand more for subjects that can be photographed easily. This is because images on Commons may be printed, viewed on monitors with very high resolution, or used in future media. This rule excludes vector graphics (SVG) or computer-generated images that have been constructed with freely-licensed or open software programs as noted in the image's description.

Image quality

Digital images can suffer various problems originating in image capture and processing, such as preventable noise, problems with JPEG compression, lack of information in shadow or highlight areas, or problems with capture of colors. All these issues should be handled correctly.

Composition and lighting

The arrangement of the subject within the image should contribute to the image. Foreground and background objects should not be distracting. Lighting and focus also contribute to the overall result; the subject should be sharp, uncluttered, and well-exposed.

Value

Our main goal is to encourage quality images being contributed to Wikicommons, valuable for Wikimedia and other projects.

How to nominate

Simply add a line of this form at the top of Commons:Quality images candidates/candidate list Nominations section:

File:ImageNameHere.jpg|{{/Nomination|Very short description  --~~~~ |}}

The description shouldn't be more than a few words, and please leave a blank line between your new entry and any existing entries.

If you are nominating an image by another Wikimedian, include their username in the description as below:

File:ImageNameHere.jpg|{{/Nomination|Very short description (by [[User:USERNAME|USERNAME]]) --~~~~ |}}

Note: there is a Gadget, QInominator, which makes nominations quicker. It adds a small "Nominate this image for QI" link at the top of every file page. Clicking the link adds the image to a list of potential candidates. When this list is completed, edit Commons:Quality images candidates/candidate list. At the top of the edit window a green bar will be displayed. Clicking the bar inserts all potential candidates into the edit window.

Number of nominations

No more than five images per day can be added by a single nominator.

Note: If possible, for every picture you nominate, please review at least one of the other candidates.

Evaluating images

Any registered user whose accounts have at least 10 days and 50 edits, other than the author and the nominator, can review a nomination. For an easier evaluation you can activate the gadget QICvote

When evaluating images the reviewer should consider the same guidelines as the nominator.

How to review

Carefully review the image. Open it in full resolution, and check if the quality criteria are met.

• If you decide to promote the nomination, change the relevant line from

File:ImageNameHere.jpg|{{/Nomination|Very short description --~~~~ | }}

to

File:ImageNameHere.jpg|{{/Promotion|Very short description --Nominators signature |Why you liked it. --~~~~}}

In other words, change the template from /Nomination to /Promotion and add your signature, possibly with some short comment.

• If you decide to decline the nomination, change the relevant line from

File:ImageNameHere.jpg|{{/Nomination|Very short description --~~~~ | }}

to

File:ImageNameHere.jpg|{{/Decline|Very short description --Nominators signature |Why you didn't like it. --~~~~}}

In other words, change the template from /Nomination to /Decline and add your signature, possibly with a statement of the criteria under which the image failed (you can use titles of section from the guidelines). If there are many problems, please note only 2 or 3 of the most severe, or add multiple problems. When declining a nomination please do explain the reasons on the nominator’s talk page – as a rule, be nice and encouraging! In the message you should give a more detailed explanation of your decision.

Note: Please evaluate the oldest images first.

Grace period and promotion

If there are no objections within a period of 2 days (exactly 48 hours) from the first review, the image becomes promoted or fails according to the review it received. If you have objection, just change its status to Discuss and it will be moved to the Consensual review section.

How to execute decision

QICbot automatically handles this 2 days after a decision has been made, and promoted images are cached in Commons:Quality Images/Recently promoted awaiting categorization before their automatic insertion in to appropriate Quality images pages.

If you believe that you have identified an exceptional image that is worthy of Featured picture status then consider also nominating the image at Commons:Featured picture candidates.

Manual instructions (open only in cases of emergency)

If promoted,

1. Add the image to appropriate group or groups of Quality images page. The image also needs to be added to the associated sub pages, only 3–4 of the newest images should be displayed on the main page.
2. Add {{QualityImage}} template to the bottom of image description page.
3. Move the line with the image nomination and review to Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives October 2025.
4. Add the template {{File:imagename.jpg}} to the user’s talk page.

If declined,

1. move the line with the image nomination and review to Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives October 2025.

• Images awaiting review show the nomination outlined in blue.
• Images the reviewer has accepted show the nomination outlined in green
• Images the reviewer has rejected show the nomination outlined in red

Unassessed images (nomination outlined in blue)

Nominated images which have not generated assessments either to promote nor to decline, or a consensus (equal opposition as support in consensual review) after 8 days on this page should be removed from this page without promotion, archived in Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives October 11 2025 and Category:Unassessed QI candidates added to the image.

Consensual review process

Consensual review is a catch all place used in the case the procedure described above is insufficient and needs discussion for more opinions to emerge.

How to ask for consensual review

To ask for consensual review, just change the /Promotion, /Decline to /Discuss and add your comments immediately following the review. An automatic bot will move it to the consensual review section within one day.

Please only send things to consensual review that have been reviewed as promoted/declined. If, as a reviewer, you cannot make a decision, add your comments but leave the candidate on this page.

Consensual review rules

See Commons:Quality images candidates#Rules

Page refresh: purge this page's cache

Nominations

Due to the Mediawiki parser code ~~~~ signatures will only work on this page if you have JavaScript enabled. If you do not have JavaScript enabled please manually sign with:

--[[User:yourname|yourname]] 10:07, 11 October 2025 (UTC)

• Please open a new date section if you are nominating an image after 0:00 o'clock (UTC)
• Please insert a blank line between your new entry and any existing entries
• Please help in reviewing "old" nominations here below first; many are still unassessed
• If you see terms with which you are unfamiliar, please see explanations at Photography terms

Please nominate no more than 5 images per day and try to review on average as many images as you nominate (check here to see how you are doing).

October 11, 2025

• 
  • Nomination: Puligny-Montrachet (Côte-d'Or, France) - Church of Our Lady of Asumption --Benjism89 09:57, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Puligny-Montrachet (Côte-d'Or, France) - Entrance of the hamlet of Blagny --Benjism89 09:57, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Puligny-Montrachet (Côte-d'Or, France) - Vineyard of Clos de la Garenne (A.O.C. Puligny-Montrachet Premier Cru) --Benjism89 09:57, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Puligny-Montrachet (Côte-d'Or, France) - Church of Our Lady of Asumption - Facade --Benjism89 09:57, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Puligny-Montrachet (Côte-d'Or, France) - Johannisberg square --Benjism89 09:57, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Yenidze in Dresden, seen from the Heinz-Steyer-Stadion --Romzig 03:30, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Ortygornis pondicerianus (Grey Francolin) in Bhigwan, Maharashtra, India. --Tisha Mukherjee 09:11, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Ortygornis pondicerianus (Grey Francolin) in Bhigwan, Maharashtra, India. --Tisha Mukherjee 09:11, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Ortygornis pondicerianus (Grey Francolin) in Bhigwan, Maharashtra, India. --Tisha Mukherjee 09:11, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Rusty-flanked Treecreeper (Certhia nipalensis) in Senchal Wildlife Sanctuary, West Bengal, India. --Tisha Mukherjee 09:11, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Rusty-flanked Treecreeper (Certhia nipalensis) in Senchal Wildlife Sanctuary, West Bengal, India. --Tisha Mukherjee 09:11, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Volvo XC60 (SPA) in Stuttgart --Alexander-93 09:03, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Audi RS e-tron GT in Stuttgart --Alexander-93 09:03, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Eiffel tower at night reflecting in the Seine in Paris, France (1) --Giles Laurent 08:48, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Alexander-93 09:04, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Eiffel tower at night reflecting in the Seine in Paris, France (2) --Giles Laurent 08:48, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Eiffel tower at night reflecting in the Seine in Paris, France (3) --Giles Laurent 08:48, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Amazing. --Alexander-93 09:04, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Basilica of the Sacred Heart of Montmartre in Paris at night (1) --Giles Laurent 08:48, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Basilica of the Sacred Heart of Montmartre in Paris at night (2) --Giles Laurent 08:48, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Alexander-93 09:04, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination BYD Tang L EV at IAA 2025 --Alexander-93 08:39, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Giles Laurent 08:49, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Volkswagen Golf IV Cabriolet in Stuttgart --Alexander-93 08:39, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Citroën C3 Aircross in Stuttgart --Alexander-93 08:39, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Giles Laurent 08:50, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Corbeille de verres et paté - Sébastien Stoskopff --GoldenArtists 08:33, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Giles Laurent 08:51, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Hedge, Burgemeester Margostraat 25B, in Kortrijk, Belgium --Velvet 08:17, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 08:33, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Culture under plastic film, Blauwkasteelstraat, in Kortrijk, Belgium --Velvet 08:16, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Litochoro --Lvova 08:04, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Angelochori --Lvova 08:04, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Loutra Volvis --Lvova 08:04, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination A view from Pyrgos Aliseos --Lvova 08:04, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 08:33, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Litochoro. The horizon is ok here - the street is not horizontal. --Lvova 08:04, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Birds flying around a traffic circle in Mysore, Karnataka, India (2024) (by Naveen R Gowda) --Gpkp 07:36, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Sangameshvara Temple, Pattadakal, Karnataka, India (2024) (by Naveen R Gowda) --Gpkp 07:36, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Giles Laurent 08:51, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Mysore Palace, Mysore, Karnataka, India (2021) (by Naveen R Gowda) --Gpkp 07:36, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Lakshmi Narayana Temple, Hosaholalu, Karnataka, India (2020) (by Naveen R Gowda) --Gpkp 07:36, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Humayun's Tomb, Delhi, India (2019) (by Naveen R Gowda) --Gpkp 07:36, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Palace in Jeleniów 1 --Jacek Halicki 07:07, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Velvet 08:23, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Palace in Jeleniów 2 --Jacek Halicki 07:07, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 08:33, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Palace in Jeleniów 3 --Jacek Halicki 07:07, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Palace in Jeleniów 4 --Jacek Halicki 07:07, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Velvet 08:23, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Chata Cyborga in Bielice --Jacek Halicki 07:07, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Sviyazhsk Uspensko-Bogorodichny Monastery Monk House --Mike1979 Russia 07:07, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Sviyazhsk Ioanno-Predtechensky monastery Fences --Mike1979 Russia 07:07, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality --Berthold Werner 07:20, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Sviyazhsk Ioanno-Predtechensky Monastery Monk House --Mike1979 Russia 07:07, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality --Berthold Werner 07:20, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Sviyazhsk Saint Sergius Church --Mike1979 Russia 07:07, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Юрий Д.К. 07:13, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Sviyazhsk Holy Trinity Church --Mike1979 Russia 07:07, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Юрий Д.К. 07:13, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination City of Lucerne in Miniland at Legoland in Guntzbourg (Allemagne). --Gzen92 06:47, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:09, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination City of Venice in Miniland at Legoland in Guntzbourg (Allemagne). --Gzen92 06:47, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:09, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Allianz Arena in Miniland at Legoland in Guntzbourg (Allemagne). --Gzen92 06:47, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:09, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Neuschwanstein Castle in Miniland at Legoland in Guntzbourg (Allemagne). --Gzen92 06:47, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:09, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination 2025, Kraków, Plac Szczepański 2 --Igor123121 06:39, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 08:34, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination 2025 pl. Mariacki 4, Kraków, Prałatówka kościoła Mariackiego --Igor123121 06:39, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Юрий Д.К. 07:14, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: 2025, Kraków, Kamienica Jaroszowska, Ulica Szpitalna 8 --Igor123121 06:39, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: 2025, Kraków, Kamienica Celestowska, Ulica Mikołajska 10 --Igor123121 06:39, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination 2025, Kraków, Szpital Ubogich Parafii Mariackiej, Ulica Sienna 16 --Igor123121 06:39, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Velvet 08:21, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Red-and-yellow barbet (Trachyphonus erythrocephalus), Serengeti Tarangire National Park, Tanzania --Poco a poco 06:36, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Igor123121 06:41, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Red-and-yellow barbet (Trachyphonus erythrocephalus), Serengeti Tarangire National Park, Tanzania --Poco a poco 06:36, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Igor123121 06:41, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination D'Arnaud's barbet (Trachyphonus darnaudii), Tarangire National Park, Tanzania --Poco a poco 06:36, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Igor123121 06:41, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination White-backed vultures (Gyps africanus), Tarangire National Park, Tanzania --Poco a poco 06:36, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Igor123121 06:41, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Red-and-yellow barbet (Trachyphonus erythrocephalus), Serengeti Tarangire National Park, Tanzania --Poco a poco 06:36, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Igor123121 06:41, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Aerial view of the church St. Veit in Hirschaid in the district of Bamberg --Ermell 06:02, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 06:39, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Honeybee (Apis mellifera) on a sunflower blossom --Ermell 06:02, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 06:30, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Red-legged furrow bee (Halictus rubicundus) on a sunflower blossom --Ermell 06:02, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 06:38, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Red-legged furrow bee (Halictus rubicundus) on a sunflower blossom --Ermell 06:02, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 06:30, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Wasp on grapes --Ermell 06:02, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 06:30, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Left valve of a Watermelon Tellin, Eurytellina punicea --Llez 05:27, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Petro Stelte 05:38, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Pumpkin cinema, pumpkin festival in the garden of Ludwigsburg Palace --Llez 05:27, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Petro Stelte 05:38, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Film set, pumpkin festival in the garden of Ludwigsburg Palace, Germany --Llez 05:27, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Petro Stelte 05:38, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  Temple of Hercules (San Marco d'Alunzio, ME) uploaded for WLM Sicily (by Matthias Süßen) but was unforeseen, uncatalogued so disqualified --GiovanniPen 05:23, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Plein in Germany-RP, catholic church: Filialkirche Sankt Jakobus --Michielverbeek 05:12, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 06:38, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Plein in Germany-RP, catholic church: Filialkirche Sankt Jakobus --Michielverbeek 05:12, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Llez 05:30, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Hasborn in Germany-RP, catholic church: Filialkirche Sankt Rochus --Michielverbeek 05:12, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Llez 05:30, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Laufeld in Germamy-RP, catholic church: Pfarrkirche Sankt Willibrord --Michielverbeek 05:12, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Llez 05:30, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Viewpoint Breil-Brigels (Graubünden). Fountain.
    --Famberhorst 04:43, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 04:50, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Clouds over the Mountainsides of Breil-Brigels (Graubünden).
    --Famberhorst 04:43, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Bolsward. St. Martin’s Church. Details of the pulpit (anno 1662) which features many carvings.
    --Agnes Monkelbaan 04:33, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 04:50, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Hortus Haren. Freshly sprouting leaves of poplars (Populus).
    --Agnes Monkelbaan 04:33, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:49, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Terracotta panels of the Lakkhi Janardan Temple in Ghurisha, Birbhum, West Bengal. --Sumitsurai 04:21, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 06:38, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Siuri Damodar Temple. --Sumitsurai 04:21, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:46, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Siuri Damodar Temple. --Sumitsurai 04:21, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:37, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Siuri Damodar Temple. --Sumitsurai 04:21, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Looks tilted --Poco a poco 06:40, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Siuri Damodar Temple. --Sumitsurai 04:21, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Romzig 09:29, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination 14th century disc cross east of Stettfeld --Plozessor 03:34, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 03:37, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Statue of Saint Aloysius in Mönchstockheim church --Plozessor 03:34, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 03:37, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Northern corner of Bramberg castle ruin --Plozessor 03:34, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 03:37, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Saint Anne church in Karbach --Plozessor 03:34, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 04:51, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination So-called "murder stone cross" west of Humprechtshausen --Plozessor 03:34, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 04:24, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Groyne at Dovetief, Norderney, Lower Saxony, Germany --XRay 03:32, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:45, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Damenpfad, Norderney, Lower Saxony, Germany --XRay 03:32, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Plozessor 03:35, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Trees shaped by the wind at Zuckerpad in the Lower Saxony Wadden Sea National Park (buffer zone), Norderney, Lower Saxony, Germany --XRay 03:32, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Plozessor 03:35, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Fragments of the sea fortress in the dunes, Norderney, Lower Saxony, Germany --XRay 03:32, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:35, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Fishing boat off Norderney, Lower Saxony, Germany --XRay 03:32, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:36, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Saint Alexander Nevsky Church, Alexandria park, Peterhof, Saint Petersburg, Russia. --Екатерина Борисова 03:20, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Plozessor 03:35, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Detail of Saint Alexander Nevsky Church, Alexandria park, Peterhof, Saint Petersburg, Russia. --Екатерина Борисова 03:20, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Roses in Orangery Garden of Lower Park, Peterhof, Saint Petersburg, Russia. --Екатерина Борисова 03:20, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Pink Hibiscus in Orangery Garden of Lower Park, Peterhof, Saint Petersburg, Russia. --Екатерина Борисова 03:20, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Exterior detail of Mariinskaya hospital (tympanum with Double-headed eagle of Russia), Saint Petersburg, Russia. --Екатерина Борисова 03:20, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 07:11, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Coat of arms of the façade of the Monastery of San Martiño Pinario, Galicia (Spain). 1798 --Lmbuga 03:06, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 03:22, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Sculpture of San Martiño Pinario. Façade of the Monastery of San Martiño Pinario, Galicia (Spain), --Lmbuga 03:06, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Plozessor 03:37, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Detail of the façade of tje Monastery of San Martiño Pinario, Galicia (Spain). 1798 --Lmbuga 03:06, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 03:22, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Escudo de armas na fachada de Acibechería. Catedral de Santiago de Compostela. --Lmbuga 03:06, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 03:22, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Escudo de armas na fachada de Acibechería. Catedral de Santiago de Compostela. --Lmbuga 03:06, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 03:22, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Zarechenskaya Street, Highway 70K-123, Efremov, Russia --Юрий Д.К. 03:00, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 03:12, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Santa Barbara Church, Maracaibo. --Rjcastillo 02:33, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:41, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Carabobo Street, Maracaibo --Rjcastillo 02:33, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
    Good picture, but there are green CAs on the word ‘Carabobo’ and on the roof in the upper right corner. --Lmbuga 02:57, 11 October 2025 (UTC) Done Thanks for reviews. --Rjcastillo 04:48, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 06:15, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Mural in Maracaibo. --Rjcastillo 02:33, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 03:01, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Cañón (artillery) --Rjcastillo 02:33, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Plozessor 03:37, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Sundial Monument, Maracaibo. --Rjcastillo 02:33, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 02:59, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Closed wing resting position of Megisba malaya (Horsfield, [1828]) - Malayan. By User:Rijuroy89 --Atudu 02:14, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Too unsharp at all --Syntaxys 02:29, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Open wing Nectaring activity of Papilio clytia Linnaeus, 1758 - Common Mime ( Form - dissimilis) . By User:Sandipoutsider --Atudu 02:14, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Blue CAs on the right wing, this can easily be corrected --Syntaxys 02:29, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Rhaphicera moorei (Butler, 1867) - Small Tawny Wall. By User:Ankit0908 --Atudu 02:14, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose IMO the left wing ist too much blurred, sorry --Syntaxys 02:29, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Issoria gemmata (Butler, 1881) - Gem Silverspot. By User:Ankit0908 --Atudu 02:14, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Left wing is unsharp too, background shows over-processing --Syntaxys 02:29, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Neope pulaha (Moore, 1858) - Veined Labyrinth. By User:Ankit0908 --Atudu 02:14, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Too much artefacts in the background through over-sharpening --Syntaxys 02:29, 11 October 2025 (UTC)

October 10, 2025

• 
  • Nomination Building of the former Gradusovs hotel, Yaroslavl. By User:Чуринъ --Екатерина Борисова 23:55, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Юрий Д.К. 01:56, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Main façade of rotunda of the former Gostiny Dvor, Yaroslavl. By User:Чуринъ --Екатерина Борисова 23:55, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good, though it has more noise than an APS-C camera should have at ISO 80. I guess there was no NR at all applied. But it's only visible in full resolution in the shadows and not a big issue. --Plozessor 03:39, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Holy Trinity Cathedral (Alexander Nevsky Lavra), Saint Petersburg, Russia. By User:Никонико962 --Екатерина Борисова 23:55, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Romzig 09:28, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Schoolhouse named after Peter the Great (upper part with relief), Saint Petersburg, Russia. By User:Никонико962 --Екатерина Борисова 23:55, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 02:57, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Former Nekludov Revenue house, Saint Petersburg, Russia. By User:Никонико962 --Екатерина Борисова 23:55, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 02:57, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Fragment of the Mandelbrot set Image --Aokoroko 23:50, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Юрий Д.К. 01:56, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Fragment of the Mandelbrot set Image --Aokoroko 23:19, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Юрий Д.К. 23:25, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination 14th-century window in Cathédrale Notre-Dame d'Évreux, Normandie --AFBorchert 23:05, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Юрий Д.К. 23:25, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Figurative panels of 14th-century window in Cathédrale Notre-Dame d'Évreux, Normandie --AFBorchert 23:05, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 03:03, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Fragment of the Mandelbrot set Image --Aokoroko 22:49, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Юрий Д.К. 23:25, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Paris, Colonne de Juillet (1830). --Terragio67 20:28, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:37, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination 15th-century Lady Chapel of Cathédrale Notre-Dame d'Évreux --AFBorchert 19:22, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --A S M Jobaer 19:34, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination East window of 15th-century Lady Chapel of Cathédrale Notre-Dame d'Évreux --AFBorchert 19:22, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --A S M Jobaer 19:34, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Mount Athos seen from Sarti on Sithonia, Greece --Kritzolina 19:16, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: The beach of the Greek village Sarti --Kritzolina 19:16, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Lagomandra Beach --Kritzolina 19:16, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Beach umbrealls stacked at the end of the season in Sarti, Chalkidiki, Greece --Kritzolina 19:16, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Beach umbrealls stacked at the end of the season in Sarti, Chalkidiki, Greece --Kritzolina 19:16, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Two vibrantly painted, round-bottomed clay pots—one yellow with black spiral designs and the other teal with orange spirals—are placed side by side on a ledge in front of a window with blue-tinted glass panes.I, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license:This media has been uploaded as a part of Project Korikath --A S M Jobaer 19:11, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Unsharp --Poco a poco 21:38, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination A striking, vertical shot of a wet, rectangular glass bottle holding amber liquid, silhouetted in the foreground with a bright cyan or turquoise blue light source directly behind it.I, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license:This media has been uploaded as a part of Project Korikath --A S M Jobaer 19:11, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Unsharp. You should know by now what is the expectation for QI. These noms are far from that, please, review your noms carefully before you ask for review here. --Poco a poco 21:39, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: A minimalist abstract close-up of a clear glass base, strikingly illuminated by neon green light against a black background.I, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license:This media has been uploaded as a part of Project Korikath --A S M Jobaer 19:11, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination A minimalist, high-contrast image of a sleek glass fragrance bottle with a visible sprayer tube, half-filled with red liquid and dramatically centered against a glowing red background.I, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license:This media has been uploaded as a part of Project Korikath --A S M Jobaer 19:11, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Unsharp --Екатерина Борисова 03:25, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination An intense and dramatic macro photograph captures an abstract texture of water condensation droplets on a glass surface, illuminated by a deep, monochrome red light that creates strong highlights and shadows.I, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license:This media has been uploaded as a part of Project Korikath --A S M Jobaer 19:11, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Unsharp --Екатерина Борисова 03:25, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination "A Fada e o Dragón" (The Fairy and the Dragon), by Xaime Quessada, Vigo, Galicia (Spain). By User:HombreDHojalata --Lmbuga 19:04, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --A S M Jobaer 19:42, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Saint Lazarus Church, Suzdal --Vsatinet 18:25, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --AFBorchert 19:24, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Saint Lazarus Church & belltower of Saint Antipas Church (Suzdal) --Vsatinet 18:25, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality but a bit small. --Sebring12Hrs 18:47, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Mini Crosser X-CAB mobility electric scooter on the dock at Nesna Harbor, Norway. --GRDN711 18:04, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Vsatinet 18:29, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Coat of arms of the Convent of the Mercedarian Mothers, Santiago de Compostela, Galicia (Spain). --Lmbuga 17:54, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 18:46, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Coat of arms of the Convent of the Mercedarian Mothers, Santiago de Compostela, Galicia (Spain). --Lmbuga 17:54, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 18:46, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Chimneys on Rúa da Fonte de Santo Antón street. Santiago de Compostela, Galicia (Spain). --Lmbuga 17:54, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 18:46, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Coat of the Convent of San Angostiño, Santiago de Compostela, Galicia (Spain). --Lmbuga 17:54, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 18:46, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Koroneiki Olive Tree. Sitia, Lasithi, Crete, Greece. --Petro Stelte 17:41, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 18:11, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Koroneiki Olive Tree. Sitia, Lasithi, Crete, Greece. --Petro Stelte 17:41, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline  Oppose The top is blurred. --Sebring12Hrs 20:27, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Koroneiki Olive Tree. Sitia, Lasithi, Crete, Greece. --Petro Stelte 17:41, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --A S M Jobaer 19:33, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Koroneiki Olive Tree. Sitia, Lasithi, Crete, Greece. --Petro Stelte 17:41, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose With f/2 most of the picture is out of focus with the consequence that just some of the fruits are sharp. The composition, however, does not lead the focus accordingly. --AFBorchert 23:15, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Blaue Lacke seen from Großer Trögler, Tyrol, Austria --Milseburg 17:05, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 17:55, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Terracotta panels of the Lakkhi Janardan Temple in Ghurisha, Birbhum, West Bengal. --RajashreeTalukdar 16:18, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 18:06, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Terracotta panels of the Lakkhi Janardan Temple in Ghurisha, Birbhum, West Bengal. --RajashreeTalukdar 16:18, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --AFBorchert 19:25, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Terracotta panels of the Lakkhi Janardan Temple in Ghurisha, Birbhum, West Bengal. --RajashreeTalukdar 16:18, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose This one is blurred --Syntaxys 16:40, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Terracotta panels of the Lakkhi Janardan Temple in Ghurisha, Birbhum, West Bengal. --RajashreeTalukdar 16:18, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Syntaxys 16:40, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Terracotta panels of the Lakkhi Janardan Temple in Ghurisha, Birbhum, West Bengal. --RajashreeTalukdar 16:18, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Syntaxys 16:40, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Graffiti, Boulevard Louis Pasteur, in Lille, France --Velvet 16:08, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 16:36, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Benches, Rue des Poissonceaux, in Lille, France --Velvet 16:07, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 16:36, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Isuzu Elf Mio EV --TTTNIS 15:36, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:38, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Isuzu DL201 engine --TTTNIS 15:36, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:38, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Nissan MR20DD engine --TTTNIS 15:36, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 18:22, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Nissan KR20DDET engine --TTTNIS 15:36, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Petro Stelte 17:42, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Nissan MR engine and CVT --TTTNIS 15:36, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Petro Stelte 17:42, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Die Kirche St. Valentin in Bergham im Sommer 2024. --2015 Michael 2015 14:51, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Strongly distorted. --Lvova 17:57, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Athyma orientalis (Elwes, 1888) - Elongated Sergeant. By User:Atanu Bose Photography --Atudu 14:43, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Ermell 21:22, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Lethe moelleri (Elwes, 1887) - White-banded Silverfork. By User:Atanu Bose Photography --Atudu 14:43, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Syntaxys 16:40, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Lethe maitrya (de Nicéville, 1881) - Barred Woodbrown. By User:Atanu Bose Photography --Atudu 14:43, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Please add the proper categories, not just that the one for the competition. Where has this photo been taken? Please complete the description. --AFBorchert 23:18, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
    category added. --Atudu 02:11, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Closewing position of Lethe maitrya de Nicéville, [1881] - Barred Woodbrown. By User:MaheshBaruahwildlife --Atudu 14:43, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Romzig 09:26, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Lethe scanda (Moore, 1858) - Blue Forester. By User:Atanu Bose Photography --Atudu 14:43, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Lacks sharpness --Poco a poco 21:41, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Volkswagen Tiguan III in Stuttgart --Alexander-93 14:14, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Velvet 16:16, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Renault 4 E-Tech Electric in Stuttgart --Alexander-93 14:14, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Vsatinet 18:29, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: 2025. Kraków, Teatr im. Juliusza Słowackiego, Plac Świętego Ducha --Igor123121 13:48, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: 2025. Kraków, Teatr im. Juliusza Słowackiego, Plac Świętego Ducha --Igor123121 13:48, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination 2025. Kraków, Teatr im. Juliusza Słowackiego, Plac Świętego Ducha --Igor123121 13:48, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Syntaxys 16:40, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination 2025. Kraków, Teatr im. Juliusza Słowackiego, Plac Świętego Ducha --Igor123121 13:48, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Giles Laurent 08:53, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination 2025. Kraków, Teatr im. Juliusza Słowackiego, Plac Świętego Ducha --Igor123121 13:48, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Composition doesn't work here : both the top and bottom of the building are cut, there's a sign hiding an interesting part of the building in the foreground. And still an issue with the texture of the sky --Benjism89 14:40, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Volvo EX90 at IAA 2025 --Alexander-93 12:14, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Velvet 16:15, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination XPeng G6 (2025) at IAA 2025 --Alexander-93 12:14, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Velvet 16:15, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Togg T10X at IAA 2025 --Alexander-93 12:14, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Holy Trinity church in Jeleniów 1 by User:Jacek Halicki--Boston9 11:51, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Blue tinted branches to correction --Gower 13:27, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Holy Trinity church in Jeleniów 2 by User:Jacek Halicki--Boston9 11:51, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Vsatinet 18:30, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Palace in Jeleniów 1 by User:Jacek Halicki--Boston9 11:51, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Gower 14:51, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Palace in Jeleniów 2 by User:Jacek Halicki--Boston9 11:51, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Gower 14:51, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Palace in Jeleniów 3 by User:Jacek Halicki--Boston9 11:51, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good qua;ity --Michielverbeek 20:11, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Gallicrex cinerea in Bhigwan, Maharashtra, India. --Tisha Mukherjee 11:36, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. Very pretty. --Gower 14:51, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Gallicrex cinerea in Bhigwan, Maharashtra, India. --Tisha Mukherjee 11:36, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. Great shot! --Gower 14:51, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Gallicrex cinerea in Bhigwan, Maharashtra, India. --Tisha Mukherjee 11:36, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Nice, but try correct red chromatic aberration (legs) --Gower 14:51, 10 October 2025 (UTC)@Gower: I am sorry but I don't see any chromatic aberration, I tried the lens filter though but nothing changes. I only see a bit of motion blur in the leg. You may oppose if this image is not up to the mark. Thank you.
• 
  • Nomination Pluvialis fulva (Pacific Golden-Plover) in Bakkhali, West Bengal, India. --Tisha Mukherjee 11:36, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:43, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Pluvialis fulva (Pacific Golden-Plover) in Bakkhali, West Bengal, India. --Tisha Mukherjee 11:36, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Eyes too blurry. Sorry. --Ermell 19:44, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Haus in der Schulstraße in Stadensen bei Uelzen --Frank Schulenburg 11:14, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Tisha Mukherjee 11:32, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. Beautiful --Gower 13:26, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: AV-8C (159232) at Intrepid Air-Sea-Space Museum, NYC (by Jakubhal) --Sebring12Hrs 10:58, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Façade detail, Museu de Arte, Arquitetura e Tecnologia, Lisbon, Portugal (by Julesvernex2) --Sebring12Hrs 10:58, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Velvet 16:12, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination A mother her child, and an egyptian goose, Campo Grande Garden, Lisbon, Portugal (by Julesvernex2) --Sebring12Hrs 10:58, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Benjism89 14:33, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Contre-jour image of Padrão dos Descobrimentos at sunrise, Lisbon, Portugal (by Julesvernex2) --Sebring12Hrs 10:58, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Benjism89 14:33, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. Very nice. --Gower 14:51, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Common chicory (Cichorium intybus), Parque Urbano do Tejo e do Trancão, Lisbon, Portugal (by Julesvernex2) --Sebring12Hrs 10:58, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. Superb. --Gower 14:51, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Shamanic ritual poles in Olkhon Island, Lake Baikal. --Argenberg 10:44, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Tisha Mukherjee 11:32, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Stone labyrinths, mazes in Olkhon Island, Lake Baikal. --Argenberg 10:44, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support sharpness, composition and picture resolution: well done (right sky: a bit too brigth) --2015 Michael 2015 14:59, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Kharantsy Island on Cape Kharantsy. Olkhon Island, Lake Baikal. --Argenberg 10:44, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Tisha Mukherjee 11:32, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Volto 850 EV, battery-powered restomod of a Volvo 850 by JP Performance --MB-one 10:37, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Tisha Mukherjee 11:32, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Belmont DW 200 at AERO Friedrichshafen 2025 --MB-one 10:37, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Tisha Mukherjee 11:32, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Iveco Daily Electric dumper at IAA Transportation 2024 --MB-one 10:37, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Rear doors of a Iveco Crossway at Busworld Europe 2023 --MB-one 10:37, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Mercedes-Benz eCitaro at Busworld Europe 2025 --MB-one 10:37, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Tisha Mukherjee 11:32, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Arc de Triomphe in Paris at night long exposure (2) --Giles Laurent 10:23, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --MB-one 10:39, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination 14th-century window in Cathédrale Notre-Dame d'Évreux --AFBorchert 10:01, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Giles Laurent 10:24, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Figurative panels of a 14th-century stained glass window in Cathédrale Notre-Dame d'Évreux --AFBorchert 10:01, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Giles Laurent 10:24, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Electricity meter in Asvestochori --Lvova 09:38, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Giles Laurent 10:24, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Angelochori in a rainy day --Lvova 09:38, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: A passage in Asvestochori --Lvova 09:38, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    PC needed --Gower 14:51, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
    Absolutely not. And it seems you don't check results after commenting. --Lvova 17:31, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Olympus from Litochoro --Lvova 09:38, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Romzig 09:25, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination A manhole cover in Katerini --Lvova 09:38, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Low detail due to low resolution, I don't see any mitigating reason why it is so small --Poco a poco 22:19, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Purple Willow in the Langwieder Heide --FlocciNivis 08:40, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 19:11, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Hollowroot in the FFH-area Isarauen von Unterföhring bis Landshut in Marzling --FlocciNivis 08:40, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Pretty but only hollowroot on the left is in focus. --Gower 14:51, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: The Water tower at Natur-Park Schöneberger Südgelände --FlocciNivis 08:40, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Looks good but... could the tilt be fixed? --AFBorchert 10:07, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: The Emile-Béthouart-Steg in Innsbruck --FlocciNivis 08:40, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    This is a nice composition with the bridge in front. However, it is tilted. Could you fix this? But I am also afraid that the crop will be worse after rotating it (for example, the church tower). --AFBorchert 10:07, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination View to the Franciscan Church in Salzburg --FlocciNivis 08:40, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Lvova 13:46, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Soviet Luch watch --Gower 08:25, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Peulle 08:34, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Meursault (Côte-d'Or, France) - Old castle (now hosting the town hall) - Tympanum of the main portal --Benjism89 06:51, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 06:53, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Meursault (Côte-d'Or, France) - Vineyard, Southwest from the town center --Benjism89 06:51, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:11, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Meursault (Côte-d'Or, France) - Peach tree (Prunus persica) planted next to vines, historically to prevent it from powdery mildew --Benjism89 06:51, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:07, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Meursault (Côte-d'Or, France) - Pinot noit vine --Benjism89 06:51, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:07, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination View of the Kullu Valley north of the resort town of Manali in the northern Indian state of Himachal Pradesh. by User:Gangulybiswarup --UnpetitproleX 06:50, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Tagooty 07:48, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Stream of muddy water at Karura Forest, Nairobi, KenyaI, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license: --Brihaspati 06:49, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Waterfall at Karura Forest, Nairobi, KenyaI, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license: --Brihaspati 06:49, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Too much saturation, chromatic aberration near white areas, colour noise in shadows. --Gower 14:51, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: I, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license: --Brihaspati 06:49, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination African baobab (Adansonia digitata), Tarangire National Park, Tanzania --Poco a poco 06:37, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 06:51, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination African baobab (Adansonia digitata), Tarangire National Park, Tanzania --Poco a poco 06:37, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 06:51, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Kazan Melnikov Revenue House Detail --Mike1979 Russia 06:36, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality --Michielverbeek 06:54, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Kazan Melnikov Revenue House Detail --Mike1979 Russia 06:36, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. Very nice --Gower 08:48, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Kazan Merkulov House --Mike1979 Russia 06:36, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 10:32, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Kazan Melnikov Revenue House --Mike1979 Russia 06:36, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 10:32, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Kłodzko Fortress 1 --Jacek Halicki 06:21, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 06:25, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Kłodzko Fortress 2 --Jacek Halicki 06:21, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 06:25, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Syntaxys 16:48, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Kłodzko Fortress 3 --Jacek Halicki 06:21, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 06:26, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Kłodzko Fortress 4 --Jacek Halicki 06:21, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 06:27, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Reymont Primary School in Kłodzko --Jacek Halicki 06:21, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 06:28, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination City of Berlin in Miniland at Legoland in Guntzbourg (Allemagne). --Gzen92 06:10, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 06:25, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Ville of Berlin in Miniland at Legoland in Guntzbourg (Allemagne). --Gzen92 06:10, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 06:26, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination City of Frankfurt in Miniland at Legoland in Guntzbourg (Allemagne). --Gzen92 06:10, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 06:26, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination City of Hamburg in Miniland at Legoland in Guntzbourg (Allemagne). --Gzen92 06:10, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 06:26, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Interior of Ranakpur Jain Temple, RajasthanI, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license: --Brihaspati 05:57, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Blurry, noisy, overexposed area, strong CA --Poco a poco 06:39, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination --Brihaspati 05:57, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Blur --Dev Jadiya 06:27, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
    A lot of color noise to fix also --Gower 14:51, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Ghurisha Lakkhi Janardan Temple Terracotta Panels. --Sumitsurai 05:41, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Gower 14:51, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Terracotta panels of the Lakkhi Janardan Temple in Ghurisha, Birbhum, West Bengal. --Sumitsurai 05:41, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 06:39, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Terracotta panels of the Lakkhi Janardan Temple in Ghurisha, Birbhum, West Bengal. --Sumitsurai 05:41, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 06:39, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Terracotta panels of the Lakkhi Janardan Temple in Ghurisha, Birbhum, West Bengal. --Sumitsurai 05:41, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Gower 14:51, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Terracotta panels of the Lakkhi Janardan Temple in Ghurisha, Birbhum, West Bengal. --Sumitsurai 05:41, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Gower 14:51, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The City Palace in Fulda, southwest view --Ermell 05:35, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 05:49, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Syntaxys 16:48, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Greenfinch (Chloris chloris, syn. Carduelis chloris) --Ermell 05:35, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Petro Stelte 05:39, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Dev Jadiya 06:27, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Syntaxys 16:48, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Aerial view of the church St. Veit in Hirschaid --Ermell 05:35, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 05:47, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 05:48, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Hornet on grapes --Ermell 05:35, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. Location would be nice. --XRay 05:48, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 05:48, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Dev Jadiya 06:27, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Ceiling fresco in Reichmannsdorf castle --Ermell 05:35, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Petro Stelte 05:39, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Dev Jadiya 06:27, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Kröv in Germany-RP, street view with churchtower --Michielverbeek 05:15, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 05:46, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --XRay 05:47, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Dev Jadiya 06:27, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination between Kinheim and Kröv in Germany-RP , wine growing --Michielverbeek 05:15, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 05:47, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Dev Jadiya 06:27, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination between Ürzig and Kinheim in Germany-RP, landscape on the Moselle --Michielverbeek 05:15, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 05:47, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Dev Jadiya 06:27, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Neuerburg in Germany-RP, catholic church: Filialkirche Sankt Nikolaus --Michielverbeek 05:15, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 05:47, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Syntaxys 16:48, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Cantilever sign “Mooi Tied”, Greetsiel, Krummhörn, Lower Saxony, Germany --XRay 05:15, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Ermell 05:32, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Dev Jadiya 06:27, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Angler (on a groyne) in the sea, Norderney, Lower Saxony, Germany --XRay 05:15, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Not sharp enough --Dev Jadiya 06:27, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Groyne at Dovetief, Norderney, Lower Saxony, Germany --XRay 05:15, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Very good quality. --George Chernilevsky 05:45, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Dev Jadiya 06:27, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Syntaxys 16:48, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Cumberland Monument, Norderney, Lower Saxony, Germany --XRay 05:15, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 05:44, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Trees shaped by the wind at Zuckerpad in the Lower Saxony Wadden Sea National Park (buffer zone), Norderney, Lower Saxony, Germany --XRay 05:15, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 06:30, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The green-leaved sulphur head (Hypholoma fasciculare) on dead wood. The mushroom is poisonous; found in the Bienwald forest near Jockgrim. --Syntaxys 05:14, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Igor123121 05:15, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Dev Jadiya 06:27, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Helmet mushroom (Mycena spec.), possibly Mycena leptocephala or Mycena galopus; size approx. 4 cm, location: mixed forest near Rheinzabern --Syntaxys 05:14, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Igor123121 05:15, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Dev Jadiya 06:27, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination South facade, classroom buildings, St. Hilda's Girls School, Ooty, The Nilgiris --Tagooty 05:13, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Igor123121 05:15, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination South facade, wide view of classroom buildings, St. Hilda's Girls School, Ooty, The Nilgiris --Tagooty 05:13, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Igor123121 05:15, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination 2025, Kraków, Cmentarz Rakowicki --Igor123121 05:10, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Tagooty 05:14, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination 2025, Kraków, Cmentarz Rakowicki --Igor123121 05:10, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
    Ok, but it needs a more specific cat, as usual --Poco a poco 06:41, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
    @Poco a poco:  Done --Igor123121 14:07, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Syntaxys 16:48, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination 2025, Kraków, Cmentarz Rakowicki --Igor123121 05:10, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
    Ok, but it needs a more specific cat, as usual --Poco a poco 06:41, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
    @Poco a poco:  Done --Igor123121 14:07, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Syntaxys 16:48, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination 2025, Kraków, Cmentarz Rakowicki --Igor123121 05:10, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Dev Jadiya 06:27, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Right valve of a Watermelon Tellin, Eurytellina punicea --Llez 05:05, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Tagooty 05:14, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Cinema box office, pumpkin festival in the garden of Ludwigsburg Palace, Germany --Llez 05:05, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 05:43, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination "Hollywood", the motto of the pumpkin festival 2025 in the garden of Ludwigsburg Palace, Germany --Llez 05:05, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 05:42, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination View of the village Kato Kria. Sitia, Lasithi, Crete, Greece. --Petro Stelte 04:09, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose The right area is blurred. --Sebring12Hrs 10:34, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Groote Zand Nature Reserve in Hooghalen Forestry. Unripe fruit on a sweet chestnut tree (Castanea sativa).
    --Agnes Monkelbaan 03:52, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Petro Stelte 04:10, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Aekingerzand Drents-Friese Wold National Park. Dead uprooted Scots pine next to the path.
    --Agnes Monkelbaan 03:52, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Petro Stelte 04:10, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Syntaxys 16:48, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination "Shepherd's cross" near Fatschenbrunn --Plozessor 03:28, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:01, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Sunlit statue of Mary at Saint Anthony church in Jesserndorf --Plozessor 03:28, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 03:56, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Poem at "Poet's house" in Bettenburg landscape park --Plozessor 03:28, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:12, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Statue of Mary and child at Saint Kilian church in Obertheres --Plozessor 03:28, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 03:57, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination View from the gallery in Augsfeld parish church --Plozessor 03:28, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:12, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination United States cruise vessel, American Constellation, leaving Port Townsend, Washington USA --GRDN711 00:51, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 01:00, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination United States cruise vessel, American Constellation, leaving Port Townsend, Washington USA --GRDN711 00:51, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 03:59, 10 October 2025 (UTC)

October 9, 2025

• 
  • Nomination: Building in Moscow --Perituss 23:34, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    chromatic aberration to fix --Gower 14:51, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Statue of Mercurius in Oranienbaum park, Saint Petersburg, Russia. By User:Игорь Гордеев --Екатерина Борисова 22:11, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 01:00, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Laocoon statue (replica) in Oranienbaum park, Saint Petersburg, Russia. By User:Игорь Гордеев --Екатерина Борисова 22:11, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 01:00, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Balcony of Ryabushinsky House, Moscow, Russia. By User:ElenaLitera --Екатерина Борисова 22:11, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    PC needed --Gower 14:51, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
    Absolutely not. The horizons here are horizontal, the verticals are vertical, and everything else has an irregular shape in real life (see in the category). --Екатерина Борисова 03:39, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination House on Vasilyeva Street, 3 in Vyborg, Russia. By User:ElenaLitera --Екатерина Борисова 22:11, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality, but I would have removed the car at the left crop --Michielverbeek 06:57, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Detail of the house on Vasilyeva Street, 3 in Vyborg, Russia. By User:ElenaLitera --Екатерина Борисова 22:11, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Plozessor 03:52, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Fruit stand in The Hague --ReneeWrites 21:56, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Lacking detail, not very sharp --Tagooty 05:17, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Fruit stand in The Hague --ReneeWrites 21:56, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    chromatic aberration to fix --Gower 14:51, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Middle panel of the altar of the Sweet Name of Jesus --ReneeWrites 21:56, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 01:02, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Stained-glass window in the St. Catherine's Church in Hoogstraten --ReneeWrites 21:56, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 01:02, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Choir gallery with organ and stained-glass window --ReneeWrites 21:56, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 01:02, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Canary Island Spurge in the Parque del Drago in Icod de los Vions, Tenerife, Spain --FlocciNivis 20:59, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --GRDN711 03:47, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The Calle San Agustín in Icod de los Vinos, Tenerife, Spain --FlocciNivis 20:59, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 01:05, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The Februardenkmal in the Rathauspark in Vienna --FlocciNivis 20:59, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Image quality: lack of information in highlight areas (grass) --Gower 14:51, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination View across the Havel from Berlin-Tegel to the Oberhavelsteg --FlocciNivis 20:59, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Plozessor 03:52, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: View across the pond Prinzenweiher in Saarbrücken --FlocciNivis 20:59, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Beautiful photograph. But there is a dust spot on the lake in the lower right corner of the image. Could you please remove it? --AFBorchert 21:52, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination 14th-century window in Cathédrale Notre-Dame d'Évreux, Normandie --AFBorchert 20:12, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 01:05, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Figurative panels of a 14th-century panel in Cathédrale Notre-Dame d'Évreux, Normandie --AFBorchert 20:12, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 01:05, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Neoscona oaxacensis, Western Spotted Orb Weaver, Coacalco, Mexico, length 3 cm aproximately: --Cvmontuy 19:13, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Too bad that the end of the upper right leg is oof. But still good very image. --Plozessor 03:52, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Tragopogon dubius seedhead --Gower 18:58, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Color noise at background. --Lvova 19:38, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Cichorium intybus flower --Gower 18:50, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support By your own standarts it's not interesting, and it's possible to see some color noise, but here we call it good quality. --Lvova 19:38, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Apodemus sylvaticus earlobe --Gower 18:48, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Very small DoF and some color noise. --Lvova 19:38, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Wolf's milk slime mould (Lycogala epidendrum) -- George Chernilevsky 18:23, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Nice, but not very sharp --Gower 18:47, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Abandoned wasp nest structure --Gower 18:17, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 18:21, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Stolberg Castle: Castle courtyard with entrance to the castle --Romzig 18:13, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    slightly unfavorable contrast and too bright clouds --Gower 19:03, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: View from Ebersberg near Hohegeiß in the Harz Mountains --Romzig 18:13, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    post-processing is unfavorable, the photo looks like it was taken from a cell phone (denoising? high contrast?) --Gower 19:03, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Oranienbaum Palace at sunset --Romzig 18:13, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Gower 18:57, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Dev Jadiya 06:55, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Clothes line on Old Town street, Dubrovnik, Croatia (by Julesvernex2) --Sebring12Hrs 18:03, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Gower 14:51, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Clouds at sunset, Alameda Dom Afonso Henriques, Lisbon, Portugal (by Julesvernex2) --Sebring12Hrs 18:03, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Gower 18:12, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Dev Jadiya 06:55, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Clouds at sunset, Alameda Afonso Henriques, Lisbon, Portugal (by Julesvernex2) --Sebring12Hrs 18:03, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 18:09, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Close-up of wire rope assembly, Jardim da Fundação Calouste Gulbenkian, Lisbon, Portugal (by Julesvernex2) --Sebring12Hrs 18:03, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Gower 18:12, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Dev Jadiya 06:55, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Cloisters, Mosteiro dos Jerónimos, Lisbon, Portugal (by Julesvernex2) --Sebring12Hrs 18:03, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Gower 18:12, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Dev Jadiya 06:55, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Nabatnaya Tower and Tilia trees --Юрий Д.К. 17:09, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Gower 17:49, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Dev Jadiya 06:55, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Vtoraya Bezymyannaya Tower --Юрий Д.К. 17:09, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality, although it's a pity that the towers were cut off --Gower 17:49, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Dev Jadiya 06:55, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination St Basil's Cathedral - remote view --Юрий Д.К. 17:09, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
    Nice, but maybe different cropping to reduce amount of sky? --Gower 17:25, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
    I agree. And this is an odd aspect ratio. Why not cropping it down to at least a proper 2:3 aspect ratio? --AFBorchert 20:25, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
     Done Thanks! --Юрий Д.К. 03:28, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Syntaxys 05:30, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Petrovskaya Tower --Юрий Д.К. 17:09, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Romzig 18:12, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Moscow - 2025 - House on the Embankment --Юрий Д.К. 17:09, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Plozessor 03:52, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Closing ceremony of Wikimania 2024 in Katowice --MB-one 16:38, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Faces aren't very sharp --Gower 19:03, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Yangwang U8 before the unveiling at Geneva International Motor Show 2024 --MB-one 16:38, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 16:43, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination View of the Elbe bridges from the castle in Meißen, Saxony --MB-one 16:38, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 16:44, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Porsche 968 Sportcoupe at Techno-Classica 2024, Essen --MB-one 16:38, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Ford Sierra RS Cosworth Mk1 at Techno-Classica 2025 --MB-one 16:38, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Good technically, but composition isn't perfect due that guy and yellow car. --Gower 18:57, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Clustered brittlestem (Psathyrella piluliformis) -- George Chernilevsky 16:18, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Gower 17:25, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Dev Jadiya 06:55, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Genesis GV60 at Automesse Ludwigsburg 2025 --Alexander-93 16:14, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 16:19, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Kia EV3 GT-Line at Automesse Ludwigsburg 2025 --Alexander-93 16:14, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Very good quality. --George Chernilevsky 16:20, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Storozhevaya Tower from the village of Torgovishche, Suksunsky district: Khokhlovka, Perm district, Perm Krai.--AlixSaz 15:39, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Toom much sky, maybe different cropping? --Gower 19:03, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Audi Q3 FJ at IAA 2025 --Alexander-93 15:32, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 16:21, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination BMW iX3 NA5 at IAA 2025 --Alexander-93 15:32, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 16:22, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Exeed Sterra ET at IAA 2025 --Alexander-93 15:32, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 16:23, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Legoland Entrance in Guntzbourg (Allemagne). --Gzen92 14:02, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Sky is now overexposed. Yellow sign is oversaturated. --E bailey 14:48, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
     Done Better? (yellow sign is a light panel) Gzen92 06:18, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Entrance to the Pirate Hotel at Legoland in Guntzbourg (Allemagne). --Gzen92 14:02, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
    Right side leaning in --Poco a poco 15:44, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
     Done Better? Gzen92 06:21, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 06:54, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Pirate Hotel Entrance at Legoland in Guntzbourg (Allemagne). --Gzen92 14:02, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
    Both side leaning in --Poco a poco 15:44, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
     Done Better? Gzen92 06:24, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 06:54, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Pirate Ship Park at Legoland in Guntzbourg (Allemagne). --Gzen92 14:02, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Benjism89 16:20, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Kłodzko Fortress 1 by User:Jacek Halicki--Boston9 13:36, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:44, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Kłodzko Fortress 2 by User:Jacek Halicki--Boston9 13:36, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:44, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Kłodzko Fortress 3 by User:Jacek Halicki--Boston9 13:36, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 16:25, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Kłodzko Fortress 4 by User:Jacek Halicki--Boston9 13:36, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 16:27, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Kłodzko Fortress 5 by User:Jacek Halicki--Boston9 13:36, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:44, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination 2025, Kraków, Cmentarz Rakowicki --Igor123121 13:29, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Romzig 18:10, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: 2025, Kraków, Cmentarz Rakowicki --Igor123121 13:29, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Kraków, ul. Augustiańska 9, Kościół św. Katarzyny Aleksandryjskiej i św. Małgorzaty --Igor123121 13:29, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Plozessor 03:48, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Kraków, ul. Augustiańska 9, Kościół św. Katarzyny Aleksandryjskiej i św. Małgorzaty --Igor123121 13:29, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Tilted. Please straighten. --E bailey 14:41, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
    @E bailey: I sent the corrected version yesterday before adding it here. Unfortunately, it hasn’t been updated yet. Sorry for the inconvenience. --Igor123121 14:50, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Koroneiki Olive Tree. Sitia, Lasithi, Crete, Greece. --Petro Stelte 12:15, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Юрий Д.К. 17:10, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Common ostrich (Struthio camelus), Ngorongoro Conservation Area, Tanzania --Poco a poco 07:14, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Ermell 09:00, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Common ostrich (Struthio camelus), Ngorongoro Conservation Area, Tanzania --Poco a poco 07:14, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Ermell 09:00, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Nea Michaniona --Lvova 07:10, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. Not very interesting composition but acceptable. --Gower 18:57, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination A lattice in Thessaloniki --Lvova 07:10, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Mike1979 Russia 07:15, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination A door in Thessaloniki --Lvova 07:10, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Mike1979 Russia 07:14, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Previously unassessed Magda Barasku's sleeve --Lvova 07:10, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Maybe stronger cropping? --Gower 14:51, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
    ok. --Lvova 18:11, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination A manhole cover in Thessaloniki --Lvova 07:10, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Mike1979 Russia 07:13, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Kazan Art College --Mike1979 Russia 07:01, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 07:05, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Kazan Marko House --Mike1979 Russia 07:01, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Giles Laurent 07:11, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Gnoeee 11:20, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Kazan Baratynsky Manor Main House Facade --Mike1979 Russia 07:01, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 07:05, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Kazan Vasily Aksyonov House-museum --Mike1979 Russia 07:01, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Benjism89 16:20, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Kazan Okonishnikov Manor Wing --Mike1979 Russia 07:01, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 07:06, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Église Saint-Brice de Beuzeville-au-Plain, Normandie, France --AFBorchert 06:50, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Mike1979 Russia 07:06, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Église Saint-Brice de Beuzeville-au-Plain, Normandie, France --AFBorchert 06:50, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Mike1979 Russia 07:05, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 07:06, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The Dome of Berlin Palace in Berlin, Germany. --AusleseBeeren 06:50, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Beautifully taken. Was this in the morning or in the evening? --AFBorchert 06:52, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Lanius vittatus (Bay-backed Shrike) in Bhigwan, Maharashtra, India. --Tisha Mukherjee 06:41, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Giles Laurent 07:10, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Ortygornis pondicerianus (Grey Francolin) in Bhigwan, Maharashtra, India. --Tisha Mukherjee 06:41, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Giles Laurent 07:10, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Ortygornis pondicerianus (Grey Francolin) in Bhigwan, Maharashtra, India. --Tisha Mukherjee 06:41, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Giles Laurent 07:10, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Mike1979 Russia 07:12, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Ortygornis pondicerianus (Grey Francolin) in Bhigwan, Maharashtra, India. --Tisha Mukherjee 06:41, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Ermell 09:02, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Ortygornis pondicerianus (Grey Francolin) in Bhigwan, Maharashtra, India. --Tisha Mukherjee 06:41, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 07:07, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Argentine black and white tegu in Parque Estadual Encontro das Águas, Brazil --Giles Laurent 06:34, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Tisha Mukherjee 06:37, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Argentine black and white tegu in Parque Estadual Encontro das Águas, Brazil --Giles Laurent 06:34, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Tisha Mukherjee 06:37, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Chalk-browed mockingbird in Parque Nacional da Chapada dos Guimarães, Brazil --Giles Laurent 06:34, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Tisha Mukherjee 06:37, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Azaras's capuchin in Parque Estadual Encontro das Águas, Brazil --Giles Laurent 06:34, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --AFBorchert 06:54, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Giant anteater in Parque Estadual Encontro das Águas, Brazil --Giles Laurent 06:34, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Ermell 09:01, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination चरण तीर्थ धाम विदिशा --Dev Jadiya 06:16, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Noise, oversharpened --Jakubhal 06:36, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination IBM Quantum Computer Demo at ITUWTSA 2024, Delhi --Dev Jadiya 06:16, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline Insufficient quality: noise, processing issues. --Peulle 06:28, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
     Oppose Required PC not possible, lack of details --Uoaei1 06:28, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Bharat Madapam Delhi --Dev Jadiya 06:16, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Perspective distortion with too tight framing to fix. Noise --Jakubhal 06:38, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Desert at in ITU WTSA Gala Dinner, Delhi with Moong Dal Halwa, Jalebi and Gulabjamun --Dev Jadiya 06:16, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline Insufficient quality: low DoF, sharpness, unbalanced composition. --Peulle 06:27, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Jamun Tree in India --Dev Jadiya 06:16, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Too strong noise --Jakubhal 06:36, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Meursault (Côte-d'Or, France) - Saint Nicholas church --Benjism89 05:48, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
     Support Good quality. --Mike1979 Russia 07:04, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
    Not so sharp, especially building on the left. --Gower 14:51, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Meursault (Côte-d'Or, France) - Saint Nicholas church - Portal --Benjism89 05:48, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 06:29, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Meursault (Côte-d'Or, France) - Republic square, with Saint Nicholas church in the background --Benjism89 05:48, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Meursault (Côte-d'Or, France) - War memorial --Benjism89 05:48, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Dev Jadiya 06:00, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Meursault (Côte-d'Or, France) - Old castle (now hosting the town hall), with the fountain in the foreground --Benjism89 05:48, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Tisha Mukherjee 06:37, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Church in Goszcz, Poland by Marian Naworski --Gower 05:41, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Tisha Mukherjee 06:37, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Talbot bulk goods wagon, Behringersmühle --Ermell 05:38, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Gower 05:47, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Dev Jadiya 05:58, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Assembly train --Ermell 05:38, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Gower 05:47, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Dev Jadiya 05:58, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The City Palace in Fulda --Ermell 05:38, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Gower 05:47, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Dev Jadiya 05:58, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The City Palace in Fulda --Ermell 05:38, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 06:21, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Interior of the parish church in Fulda --Ermell 05:38, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality, but could be a bit brighter with more contrast. Could be a FP candidate then. --Uoaei1 06:21, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Kautenbach in Germany-RP, catholic church: Filialkirche Sankt Maria Himmelfahrt --Michielverbeek 05:15, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Ermell 05:39, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Traben-Trarbach in Germany-RP, view to Traben from the bridge (Moselbrücke) --Michielverbeek 05:15, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Withdrawn
     Support Good quality. --Ermell 05:48, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
     Oppose Looks blur sorry --Dev Jadiya 05:58, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
     Oppose Sorry, but I have to agree. Not sharp enough --Jakubhal 06:40, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Right valve of a fossil Venus Clam, Pitar parisiensis --Llez 05:09, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 05:11, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Detail of the fence of the the Western Forecourt, Ludwigsburg Palace --Llez 05:09, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 05:11, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 05:11, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Upper part gate of the entrance to the Western Forecourt with the monogram F(riedericus) R(ex) of Frederick I of Württemberg, Ludwigsburg Palace, Germany --Llez 05:09, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 05:11, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Porcini mushroom (Boletus edulis), juvenile stage --Syntaxys 05:03, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 05:07, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
    Wrong identification. This is clearly Bay bolete (Imleria badia). Fix description and category, please. --George Chernilevsky 16:35, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
    The mushroom doesn't turn blue when pressed, which is what a chestnut bolete (Imleria badia) always does. I'm sure it's a porcini mushroom; I've found this variety here many times before. Fixed I've checked the mushroom again after some hours, now it turned blue, when pressed. That wasn't the case when I took him with me. --Syntaxys 18:59, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality, all OK now --George Chernilevsky 06:33, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Boletus edulis is an edible mushroom in the Basidiomycete phylum. By User:Bernie Kohl --Syntaxys 05:03, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 05:07, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Hacker-Festzelt, Oktoberfest --Kallerna 04:49, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. But what about personality rights? --Uoaei1 05:11, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Rio de le Do Torre seen from Ponte Bernando --Kallerna 04:49, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Syntaxys 05:06, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination San Michele Arcangelo church, Quarto d'Altino --Kallerna 04:49, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Ermell 05:34, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Porta San Tomaso --Kallerna 04:49, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Llez 05:14, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: 2025, Kraków, Bazylika Bożego Ciała w Krakowie --Igor123121 04:22, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review Good quality --Michielverbeek 05:22, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
    Tilted wall surface, asymmetrical composition doesn't fit to expose main theme: portal --Gower 05:52, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
    @Gower:  Done --Igor123121 13:38, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: 2025 Poznań, Okrąglak w Poznaniu --Igor123121 04:22, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review Good quality. --Llez 05:13, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
    Crooked a bit, correctio needed. --Gower 05:52, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
    @Gower:  Done --Igor123121 13:38, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination 2025 Poznań, Kościół św. Franciszka Serafickiego w Poznaniu --Igor123121 04:22, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
    There is something wrong with the cloud on the right --Uoaei1 05:18, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
    @Uoaei1:  Done --Igor123121 05:35, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
    Whatever you have done, this has negative impact on the adjacent building --Uoaei1 06:31, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
    @Uoaei1:  Done? --Igor123121 13:38, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Ok now --Uoaei1 14:26, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Parish church Zwickenberg, municipality of Oberdrauburg, Carinthia, Austria --Uoaei1 04:09, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 05:10, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Remote view from the Kobesser estate to Hochosterwitz Castle, municipality of Sankt Georgen am Längsee, Carinthia, Austria --Uoaei1 04:09, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 05:10, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Trail from Andiast to Breil-Brigels. Bad weather in the Breil-Brigels region, but it has now dried up.
    --Famberhorst 04:09, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Llez 05:10, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Aekingerzand
  • Promotion Aekingerzand]] Drents-Friese Wold National Park. Dead Birch (Betula) fallen in a heathland pond.
    --Agnes Monkelbaan 04:01, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:07, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Syntaxys 05:06, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Main Gate of Hiroshima Castle --Jakubhal 03:50, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Plozessor 03:54, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Syntaxys 05:06, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Shells on the beach, Norderney, Lower Saxony, Germany --XRay 03:49, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Lvova 13:43, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Swimming area marking (with red and yellow flag as swimming zone boundary) on West Beach, Norderney, Lower Saxony, Germany --XRay 03:49, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:06, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Syntaxys 05:06, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Miss Louisiana 2025 Gabrelle McLeod at Madison High School in Tallulah, Louisiana. --Ktkvtsh 02:32, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline
    Could you mind adding the personality attribution --Dev Jadiya 05:58, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
     Oppose Weak details on the face (after denoising), still some noise on the blue dress. Tilted and cluttered background --Jakubhal 06:43, 9 October 2025 (UTC)

October 8, 2025

• 
  • Nomination: Krombach (Lower Franconia), Schulberg 10, War Memorial --KaiBorgeest 21:46, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Too much empty space at the top and on the right IMO --Lmbuga 23:06, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Residential house, Suzdal --Vsatinet 21:22, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Ktkvtsh 02:32, 9 October 2025 (UTC)  Support Nice, like dača in winter. --PetarM 08:49, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Beacon at the entrance to the harbour of Nikiti --Kritzolina 17:50, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Not sharp enough --Dev Jadiya 05:58, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: View along the Hotel Añaza in Acorán, Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain --FlocciNivis 17:37, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Interesting motif and subject, but the horizon is not horizontal. Please, check also the verticality after having rotated the image. --Harlock81 19:19, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Department of Transport Management, Nepal after Genz Protest --Bijay Chaurasia 16:32, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Romzig 18:08, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Demonstrations and protests in Nepal in 2025 --Bijay Chaurasia 16:32, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Strange description. I don't see any demonstrations and protests here. --Екатерина Борисова 22:18, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination XPeng G6 (2025) at IAA 2025 --Alexander-93 16:19, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Юрий Д.К. 07:16, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Togg T10X at IAA 2025 --Alexander-93 16:19, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Plozessor 03:48, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Lindley canal in Łódź, Poland by Marian Naworski --Gower 15:39, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Impressive. --Harmonide 16:25, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Syntaxys 05:06, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination 4a Stryjeńskiej Street in Kłodzko 2 by User:Jacek Halicki--Boston9 13:37, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Gower 16:23, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Dev Jadiya 06:55, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination 4a Stryjeńskiej Street in Kłodzko 3 by User:Jacek Halicki--Boston9 13:37, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Gower 16:23, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Dev Jadiya 06:55, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination 2025, Kraków, Park Strzelecki w Krakowie, 21 --Igor123121 13:36, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Gower 16:23, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Could you center a bit more the subject, though? --Harmonide 16:40, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Dev Jadiya 06:55, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination 20225, Kraków, Cmentarz Rakowicki w Krakowie --Igor123121 13:36, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
    Nice but needs little perspective correction. --Gower 16:23, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Harmonide 16:25, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Dev Jadiya 06:55, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Asvestochori --Lvova 08:25, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Igor123121 15:56, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Gower 16:23, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Dev Jadiya 06:55, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Stivos --Lvova 08:25, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Igor123121 15:56, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. Nicely composed. --Gower 16:23, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Dev Jadiya 06:55, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Lanius excubitor (Great Grey Shrike) in Bhigwan, Maharashtra, India. --Tisha Mukherjee 06:50, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Igor123121 06:57, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Lovely. --Harmonide 12:53, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Dev Jadiya 06:55, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Lanius excubitor (Great Grey Shrike) in Bhigwan, Maharashtra, India. --Tisha Mukherjee 06:50, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Igor123121 06:57, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Really good. --Harmonide 12:53, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Dev Jadiya 06:55, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Alauda gulgula (Oriental Skylark) in Bakkhali, West Bengal, India. --Tisha Mukherjee 06:50, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Igor123121 06:57, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Harmonide 12:53, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Dev Jadiya 06:55, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Pluvialis fulva (Pacific Golden-Plover) in Bakkhali, West Bengal, India. --Tisha Mukherjee 06:50, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Igor123121 06:57, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Harmonide 12:53, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Dev Jadiya 06:55, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Pluvialis fulva (Pacific Golden-Plover) in Bakkhali, West Bengal, India. --Tisha Mukherjee 06:50, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Igor123121 06:57, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Harmonide 12:53, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Dev Jadiya 06:55, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Meursault (Côte-d'Or, France) - Sign at the entrance of Château de Meursault, one of the most famous vineyards in Burgundy --Benjism89 06:22, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 06:28, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Dev Jadiya 06:55, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Meursault (Côte-d'Or, France) - Charles Giraud street, entering the center from Southeast --Benjism89 06:22, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 06:28, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Dev Jadiya 06:55, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Meursault (Côte-d'Or, France) - Château of Cîteaux, now a hotel and restaurant --Benjism89 06:22, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 06:28, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Harmonide 13:40, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Dev Jadiya 06:55, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Meursault (Côte-d'Or, France) - Saint Nicholas church - Church tower --Benjism89 06:22, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 06:28, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Nice. --Harmonide 13:13, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Dev Jadiya 06:55, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Meursault (Côte-d'Or, France) - Saint Nicholas church --Benjism89 06:22, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 06:28, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Harmonide 13:40, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Dev Jadiya 06:55, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Sviyazhskaya Makaryevskaya Pustyn Bell Tower --Mike1979 Russia 05:49, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Tisha Mukherjee 06:44, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Harmonide 13:40, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Dev Jadiya 06:55, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Raifsky Bogoroditsky Monastery Saints of Sinay and Raifa Refectory Church --Mike1979 Russia 05:49, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Tisha Mukherjee 06:44, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Harmonide 13:40, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Dev Jadiya 06:55, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Kazan Ascension Monastery Resurrection Church --Mike1979 Russia 05:49, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Tisha Mukherjee 06:44, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Harmonide 13:40, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Dev Jadiya 06:55, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination War memorial in front of St. Mary's Church in Poppenhausen in Heldburg --Ermell 05:41, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Tisha Mukherjee 06:44, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Dev Jadiya 06:55, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Door of of St. Mary's Church in Poppenhausen in Heldburg --Ermell 05:41, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support It is minimally tilted to the right. But still in tolerance to be assessed to be of good quality. --AFBorchert 08:22, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Dev Jadiya 06:55, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Morbach in Germany-RP, catholic church: Pfarrkirche Sankt Anna --Michielverbeek 05:29, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
    Perspective correction needed, tower is a bit tilted. --Gower 16:23, 8 October 2025 (UTC) Thanks  Done perspective correction --Michielverbeek 06:51, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 07:10, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Gonzerath in Germany-RP, catholic church: Pfarrkirche Sankt Antonius und Sankt Valerius --Michielverbeek 05:28, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 06:11, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Harmonide 12:53, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Dev Jadiya 06:55, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Left valve of a fossil Venus clam, Meroena separata --Llez 05:18, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 05:20, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Harmonide 12:53, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Dev Jadiya 06:55, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Upper part of the right gate pillar of the entrance to the Western Forecourt, Ludwigsburg Palace, Germany --Llez 05:18, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 05:19, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Harmonide 12:53, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Dev Jadiya 06:55, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Upper part of the left gate pillar of the entrance to the Western Forecourt, Ludwigsburg Palace, Germany --Llez 05:18, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 05:19, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Harmonide 12:53, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Dev Jadiya 06:55, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Saint Erasmus at the winged altar of the parish church Zwickenberg, municipality of Oberdrauburg, Carinthia, Austria --Uoaei1 04:50, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Ermell 05:56, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Harmonide 12:53, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Dev Jadiya 06:55, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Devotee in Lord Shiva's pose --I.Mahesh 04:16, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline
    Needs categories. --Ermell 05:36, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
    {{Personality rights}} needs to be added. And please add a more elaborate description: Where in India have these portraits been taken? --AFBorchert 11:04, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
     Oppose Like all other from this serie, it is cool, but not a Quality image. --Lvova 13:41, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Sri vari swarana radham at Tirupati --I.Mahesh 04:16, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Appears to be tilted. Could you please fix this? --AFBorchert 11:05, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
    I love this one. But isn't it a bit tilted? --Harmonide 16:40, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Trail from Andiast to Breil-Brigels. Bad weather in the Breil-Brigels region, with rain expected.<br--Famberhorst 04:14, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 04:23, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Harmonide 16:40, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Dev Jadiya 06:55, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Painted stone exchange point by the trail to Klimczok in Szczyrk (Silesian Beskids), related to the social media activity #kamienie #szczyrk --Jakubhal 03:49, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:09, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Interesting and sweet. --Harmonide 12:40, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Dev Jadiya 06:55, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Shiny cowbird in a Pink Ipê tree in Parque Estadual Encontro das Águas --Giles Laurent 03:40, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:12, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Harmonide 12:40, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Dev Jadiya 06:55, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Green ibis in Parque Estadual Encontro das Águas, Brazil --Giles Laurent 03:40, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 03:50, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Yes! --Harmonide 11:34, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Dev Jadiya 06:55, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Parish church in Augsfeld --Plozessor 03:32, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Giles Laurent 03:43, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Gower 16:23, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Dev Jadiya 06:55, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Sculpture on the portal of the College of Saint Jerome. Santiago de Compostela, Galicia (Spain). --Lmbuga 03:06, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 03:20, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Harmonide 16:43, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Dev Jadiya 06:55, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Statue of Jesus on the cross. --Rjcastillo 02:11, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:20, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Harmonide 16:43, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Dev Jadiya 06:55, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Carabobo Street, Maracaibo --Rjcastillo 02:11, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Plozessor 03:40, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Harmonide 16:43, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Dev Jadiya 06:55, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Mural in Maracaibo. --Rjcastillo 02:11, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Plozessor 03:40, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good! --Harmonide 11:34, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Dev Jadiya 06:55, 10 October 2025 (UTC)

October 7, 2025

• 
  • Nomination: 2025, Kraków, Ratusz dawnej jurydyki Garbary, Ulica Karmelicka 12 (1) --Igor123121 16:23, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    not very favorable composition and framing, it's a pity that the entire façade was not included --Gower 18:40, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
    @Gower: Thank you for your comment, but I don’t really understand how I should respond to it. True, the composition may not be the most favorable, but I am waiting for a vote for or against. We shouldn’t dwell on the past, for example that a photo of the whole building wasn’t taken, etc. I would also like to remind you that when commenting on multiple photos, you don’t need to redirect each one to the discussion; you can also use the comment function. --Igor123121 18:48, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
    Returned to Nomination section. Please, use Comment if you have a comment. Lvova 09:09, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Human Rights Trail plaque. Salvador Parga Square. Santiago de Compostela. Galicia (Spain). --Lmbuga 23:44, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
    I found pictures of this plaque on the Internet, and in them the upper part is round, while in your photo it is elongated (maybe because of PC). Can you fix this issue, please? --Екатерина Борисова 01:53, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
     Comment You're right. I will endeavour to improve it. --Lmbuga 02:23, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
     Done When I made the correction, the image size decreased significantly, but I think it looks better.--Lmbuga 02:37, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Harmonide 12:37, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Yes, it looks like QI now, thanks. --Екатерина Борисова 22:26, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Sports school 3 in Yefremov --Юрий Д.К. 22:47, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
    The quality of the picture is unquestionable, but the vertical line of the building on its left side is tilted. If you tell me that the building is like that, I will promote it. --Lmbuga 23:29, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
    Hi, both images will be fixed --Юрий Д.К. 03:00, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 09:55, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Dev Jadiya 06:55, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Moscow - 2025 - Colonnade of Big Theatre --Юрий Д.К. 22:47, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 23:29, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good geometry. --Harmonide 12:37, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Dev Jadiya 06:55, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Moscow - 2025 - City Sightseeing boat --Юрий Д.К. 22:47, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 23:29, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Harmonide 12:37, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Dev Jadiya 06:55, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Bouvigne Castle, Breda --ReneeWrites 22:30, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 22:41, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Nice shot. --Harmonide 12:37, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Dev Jadiya 06:55, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination "The Lightning Bolt", a Z-shaped lookout tower near Breda --ReneeWrites 22:30, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 23:19, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Harmonide 12:37, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Dev Jadiya 06:55, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination "The Lightning Bolt", a Z-shaped lookout tower near Breda --ReneeWrites 22:30, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 23:18, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Harmonide 12:37, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Dev Jadiya 06:55, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination "The Lightning Bolt", a Z-shaped lookout tower near Breda --ReneeWrites 22:30, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 23:18, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Harmonide 12:37, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Dev Jadiya 06:55, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Clustered brittlestem (Psathyrella piluliformis) -- George Chernilevsky 21:06, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 23:14, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Love this one. --Harmonide 11:34, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Dev Jadiya 06:55, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Mohammad (Darafsh). Second day of Wikimedia CEE Meeting 2025. --Красный 19:30, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Quite nice portrait, but not very sharp. chromatic aberration (cigarette) --Gower 14:51, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Zolfeqor Fatihzadeh. Second day of Wikimedia CEE Meeting 2025. --Красный 19:30, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline
    Focus is on beard, not on eyes. --Gower 13:58, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
    Just a comment, so I'm formatting it as a comment again. @Gower: , pay attention pls. --Lvova 14:54, 8 October 2025 (UTC)  Oppose Agree with @Gower: . Focus point problem. --PetarM 08:53, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination detail of Sher-Dor Madrasa, Samarkand --PetarM 18:25, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Gower 20:16, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Waw. --Harmonide 11:34, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Dev Jadiya 06:55, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Ceiling & Calligraphy of Bibi-Khanym Mausoleum, Samarkand --PetarM 17:31, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Gower 17:46, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Wonderful. Thank you for this contribution! --Harmonide 11:34, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Dev Jadiya 06:55, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Karmi is a village in Kapkot block of Bageshwar district in Uttarakhand. By User:Harshit SR --UnpetitproleX 17:13, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Gower 17:46, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Wow. --Harmonide 12:37, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Dev Jadiya 06:55, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Surviving fragment of an altar with reliefs of the apostles, 15th or 16th century, Saint-Brice de Beuzeville-au-Plain, Normandie. --AFBorchert 16:49, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Gower 17:46, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Harmonide 11:34, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Dev Jadiya 06:55, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: XPeng P7+ at IAA 2025 --Alexander-93 16:15, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    IMHO loss of detail in shadows --Gower 16:23, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Avatr 12 at IAA 2025 --Alexander-93 16:15, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    IMHO loss of detail in shadows --Gower 16:23, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Freihafenelbbrücke, part of the northern elbe bridges in Hamburg. --Dirtsc 14:51, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. Very nice. --Gower 18:40, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Harmonide 11:34, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Dev Jadiya 06:55, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: The main entrance of Ujjayanta Palace, Agartala, Tripura --Herpking 13:57, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    PC is needed. --Sebring12Hrs 19:12, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: IndiGo Airbus A320-251N - VT-IXA at Maharaja Bir Bikram Airport (IXA) --Herpking 13:57, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Vigneting, perspective correction needed, too soft --Poco a poco 19:21, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Baneswar Shiva Temple, Baneswar, Cooch Behar, WB --Herpking 13:57, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    I am sorry, in my opinion it is underexposed and needs perspective correction. --Lmbuga 16:22, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
    The building is slightly tilted. Could you please fix this? --AFBorchert 16:23, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Young priests under the age of 16 perform daily rituals, including cleaning and worshiping the reclining Vishnu statue, at the Budhanilkantha Temple in Nepal. --Bijay Chaurasia 10:36, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Crisco 1492 14:34, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Gower 18:40, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support What a mesmerizing picture. Thank you for this valuable contribution. --Harmonide 00:04, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Dev Jadiya 16:25, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Main entrance of Sansad Bhavan of Nepal (International Convention Centre Nepal) After GenZ Protest8,9 September 2025, --Bijay Chaurasia 10:36, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    A bit noisy. Tilted and needs perspective correction. --Lmbuga 13:03, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
    New file updated with NR and Perspective Correction --Bijay Chaurasia 08:13, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Młynówka in Kłodzko 2 --Jacek Halicki 06:23, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
    Right side leaning in --Poco a poco 06:29, 7 October 2025 (UTC)@Poco a poco:  Done--Jacek Halicki 09:02, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 22:06, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Młynówka in Kłodzko 4 --Jacek Halicki 06:23, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
    Slight ccw tilt --Poco a poco 06:29, 7 October 2025 (UTC)@Poco a poco:  Done--Jacek Halicki 09:02, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 22:06, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Dark pink Hibiscus in Orangery Garden of Lower Park, Peterhof, Saint Petersburg, Russia. --Екатерина Борисова 03:17, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --MB-one 16:30, 9 October 2025 (UTC)

October 6, 2025

• 
  • Nomination: View of Grand Kremlin Palace in 2025 --Юрий Д.К. 23:58, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    There is a dust spot left of the cloud, this should be cloned away. Otherwise good quality. --Syntaxys 02:55, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
    @Syntaxys: Done, thanks. Please review. --Юрий Д.К. 12:16, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
    It was by some reason a /Discussion, I put into /Nomination again. --Lvova 19:42, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: View across a field, located in the Weststadt of Neu-Ulm, to the Ulm Minster --FlocciNivis 16:34, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Good photo but it should be shifted, church tower is not straight. --Gower 17:45, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
     Done, I performed PC --FlocciNivis 17:38, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
     Comment @Gower: Please do not send images to the discussion section if you are just making a comment to the author rather than opposing another reviewer. Use button Comment, not button Discuss. -- Екатерина Борисова 03:26, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
    Returned to Nomination section. Lvova 09:24, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: View along a building of the Ensemble Brauerei Becker. --FlocciNivis 16:34, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Nice but high CA on trees branches and overexposed sky. --Gower 17:59, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
    Returned to Nomination section. Please, use Comment if you have a comment. Lvova 09:23, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: 2025, Kraków, Dom Długosza w Krakowie --Igor123121 15:56, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Composition doesn't highlight the main theme: door --Gower 18:40, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
    Returned to Nomination section. Please, use Comment if you have a comment. And the main topic here is definetely not a door, but a portal. Lvova 09:12, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
    Portal of course, not the door, but photo was cropped in the meantime --Gower 13:58, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Aerial view of the US Army urban warfare training site in Mainz-Finthen --MB-one 18:26, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    A bit random composition and perspective. --Gower 18:40, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
    Returned to Nomination section. Please, use Comment if you have a comment. Lvova 09:10, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Wladzimer Rusakovich. First day of Wikimedia CEE Meeting 2025. --Красный 08:25, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Pink shirt from the left, maybe different cropping? --Gower 17:59, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
    Returned to Nomination section. Please, use Comment if you have a comment. Lvova 08:54, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Nikolskaya Tower - Moscow --Юрий Д.К. 23:58, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 03:21, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Gower 13:58, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Dev Jadiya 06:55, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Augustinian convent in Crémieu, Isere, France. --Tournasol7 20:38, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Nice, but the wall of the right has a purple fringe. --Sebring12Hrs 21:19, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
    Upper left area: Clear CAs and strong blue halo on the corner--Lmbuga 21:21, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Škoda Kodiaq II RS in Stuttgart --Alexander-93 18:32, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 17:00, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Mini Aceman John Cooper Works in Stuttgar --Alexander-93 18:32, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 17:01, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Auto-Union Typ C at IAA 2025 --Alexander-93 17:14, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
    interesting photo, but kind of 'plastic' texture and strong contrast on tires --Gower 17:45, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 07:31, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: View from the hydroelectric power plant Pielweichs to the South on the Isar --FlocciNivis 16:34, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Is it me, or is the image tilted CW? Also quite warm WB for that early in the afternoon, even in February. --MB-one 16:30, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Kraków, Kamienica Pod Złotą Głową w Krakowie 2025 --Igor123121 15:56, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
     Oppose crooked photo (see line of windows) --Gower 16:07, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
    @Gower:  Done By the way, you used the template incorrectly :) --Igor123121 16:26, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Aqua Pour Homme Eau de Toilette is a fresh, masculine fragrance designed with a sleek and modern aesthetic.I, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license:This media has been uploaded as a part of Project Korikath --A S M Jobaer 09:56, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Composition and crop, also would need more specific description. --Plozessor 03:46, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Aqua Pour Homme Eau de Toilette is a fresh, masculine fragrance designed with a sleek and modern aesthetic.I, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license:This media has been uploaded as a part of Project Korikath --A S M Jobaer 09:56, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    I think, this should be in portrait mode, rather than landscape. Otherwise ok --MB-one 16:30, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Ravana Ella Rajamaha Vihara is a Buddhist temple near Ravana Falls, Ella, Sri Lanka. --Satdeep Gill 06:41, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --MB-one 16:30, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Silea hydroelectric power station --Kallerna 06:20, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Needs slight perspective correction (not parallel vertical lines of the building) --Gower 16:23, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
    Thanks, fixed! --Kallerna 04:55, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Weir in Kłodzko --Jacek Halicki 06:17, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality, but rather dull lighing. --Gower 16:23, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Dev Jadiya 06:55, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: 2025, Poznań, bazylika archikatedralna Świętych Apostołów Piotra i Pawła w Poznaniu --Igor123121 04:47, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Wrong (too strong) perspective; the walls look as if they are narrowing inwards --Gower 16:23, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: 2025, Poznań, bazylika archikatedralna Świętych Apostołów Piotra i Pawła w Poznaniu --Igor123121 04:47, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Column is a bit tilted. --Gower 14:45, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
    Just a comment, so I'm formatting it as a comment again. @Gower: , pay attention pls. --Lvova 14:51, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Santiago Compostela Cathedral 2023 - Former portico of A Corticela. By User:Fernando --Lmbuga 02:45, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Gower 16:23, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Dev Jadiya 06:55, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: White tower in Thessaloniki --Lvova 00:09, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Tilted, otherwise good --Plozessor 02:51, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
    Perspective distortion IMO --Lmbuga 03:04, 6 October 2025 (UTC)

October 5, 2025

• 
  • Nomination: 2025, ul. Długa 5, Kraków, Dom Pod Głowami --Igor123121 07:37, 5 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Side window portals unnecessarily cut --Gower 18:40, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
    Returned to Nomination section. Please, use Comment if you have a comment. Lvova 09:19, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination A building of the Campus Benjamin Franklin in Berlin --FlocciNivis 10:02, 5 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
    Quite acceptable but too much bush at the bottom.Composition doesn't highlight main theme. --Gower 18:40, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
    Returned to Nomination section. Please, use Comment if you have a comment. Lvova 09:18, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
    To me this composition works, also QI in all other aspects --Kritzolina 19:22, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Anastasiya Lvova. Learning day of Wikimedia CEE Meeting 2025. --Красный 10:31, 5 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Good quality but a bit random composition (hand of another guy, empty bottle) --Gower 18:40, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
    Returned to Nomination section. Please, use Comment if you have a comment. Lvova 09:16, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Stolberg Castle: Inscription above the entrance --Romzig 18:39, 5 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
    Crooked a bit. --Gower 16:23, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support It's definitely not crooked. --Екатерина Борисова 22:35, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Коровник (Музей-заповедник В.Д. Поленова). --Celest 17:36, 5 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Overprocessed, a lot of burned out spots. Too intense contrast. --Gower 14:45, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
    Just a comment, so I'm formatting it as a comment again. @Gower: , pay attention pls. --Lvova 14:51, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: «Аббатство» (мастерская художника) (Музей-заповедник В.Д. Поленова). --Celest 17:34, 5 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    PC needed, should be easy ... --Syntaxys 18:44, 5 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: 1976 Opel Commodore GS at the technical inspection for Rallye Monte Carlo Historique 2025 in Bad Homburg --MB-one 17:08, 5 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review It would be a nice photo without the three men. The third one, who appears to be wiping his mouth, is particularly distracting. -- Spurzem 18:37, 5 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Audi TTRS Audi Sport Performance Parts at IAA 2017 --MB-one 17:08, 5 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Tilted, and that other photographer is disturbing the composition. --Plozessor 03:46, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Ebusco 3.0 at Busworld Europe 2023 --MB-one 17:08, 5 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review It's a bit too distorted, and the reflections make it hard to see anything of the bus. I wouldn't have nominated this photo for an award. -- Spurzem 18:33, 5 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Sidi Ahmed Mosque --User:Mounir Neddi 15:07, 5 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Needs perspective correction. Power line/cable distracts from subject.. --E bailey 15:25, 5 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Christos Varvantakis. Learning day of Wikimedia CEE Meeting 2025. --Красный 10:31, 5 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Maybe different heavier cropping could be better? --Gower 14:45, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Angelochori --Lvova 08:06, 5 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Romzig 18:05, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Mercedes-Benz C174 350 4Matic at autoMOBIL Tübingen 2025 --Alexander-93 07:52, 5 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --MB-one 16:30, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: 2025, Kraków, Kamienica (schronisko brata Alberta) --Igor123121 07:37, 5 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    PC is needed. --Sebring12Hrs 11:25, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
    @Sebring12Hrs:  Done :) --Igor123121 18:46, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
    Thanks for your effort, perspective is ok, but the crop is may be too tight. Other opinion ? --Sebring12Hrs 21:49, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Senningen in Luxembourg, church: Kirche Mariä Himmelfahrt --Michielverbeek 06:51, 5 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Tower is a bit tilted --Gower 14:45, 8 October 2025 (UTC) Perspective correction  Done --Michielverbeek 17:26, 9 October 2025 (UTC)

October 4, 2025

• 
  • Nomination: A building in Scholari --Lvova 00:05, 4 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Bizarre composition, image shows a road or a building? --Gower 18:40, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
    Surprisingly both. Returned to Nomination section. Please, use Comment if you have a comment. Lvova 08:57, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Schwalbe bicycle tires at Cycling World Europe 2025 --MB-one 22:01, 4 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    First tire not very sharp --Gower 16:23, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Participants of ADAC Deutschland Klassik 2025 entering Alte Brücke ("Old Bridge") in Heidelberg --MB-one 22:01, 4 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Half of image is the road, not very pretty composition. --Gower 13:58, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Winnie Kabintie at Wikimania 2024 in Katowice --MB-one 22:01, 4 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
    I think fully cropped out the partly-cropped man on the right will be a better composition --Tagooty 04:16, 5 October 2025 (UTC)
     Done Thanks for the review --MB-one 09:39, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Tagooty 09:40, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Mercedes-Benz eIntouro M at Busworld Europe 2025 --MB-one 22:01, 4 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Gower 16:23, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Dev Jadiya 06:55, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Neel and Anita Tamang are Nepali workers who build Pakbu (Ladakhi mudbrick) in Shey village, Ladakh. --Satdeep Gill 16:50, 4 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Needs a precise description and caption. CATs could also be improved. --Tagooty 04:24, 5 October 2025 (UTC)
     Done @Tagooty: --Satdeep Gill 06:46, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
    The DoF is marginal, too much in the composition. Cropping to the bricks in front and left centre will make a better image, IMO. --Tagooty 08:46, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Neel and Anita Tamang are Nepali workers who build Pakbu (Ladakhi mudbrick) in Shey village, Ladakh. --Satdeep Gill 16:50, 4 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Trees look a bit tilted --Gower 14:45, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination 1991 Nissan FEV --TTTNIS 15:22, 4 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Dev Jadiya 05:58, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Rear view of 1991 Nissan FEV --TTTNIS 15:22, 4 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Dev Jadiya 05:58, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Bridge at Matejki Street in Kłodzko after flood 2 by User:Jacek Halicki--Boston9 15:03, 4 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --MB-one 13:03, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Gower 14:45, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Dev Jadiya 06:55, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: View across a field adjacent to the bird sanctuary Ismaninger Speichersee und Fischteiche with the alps and tower cranes in the background --FlocciNivis 10:52, 4 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    I see some dust spots. --Lvova 09:54, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Renault 4 E-Tech Electric at Automesse Ludwigsburg 2025 --Alexander-93 09:56, 4 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Dev Jadiya 05:58, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: 2025 Kraków, Kościół św. Katarzyny Aleksandryjskiej i św. Małgorzaty w Krakowie --Igor123121 06:59, 4 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Crooked a bit. --Gower 14:45, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
     Done --Igor123121 17:04, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: 2025 Przemyśl, Pałac biskupów gr.-kat., Plac Tadeusza Czackiego 3 w Przemyślu --Igor123121 06:59, 4 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Perspective correction needed, vertical lines of a building aren't parallel --Gower 14:45, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
     Done --Igor123121 17:04, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: ZIL-130 at Seifullin avenue at the corner with Gogol street. Almaty, Kazakhstan. --Красный 06:47, 4 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Acceptable but ZIL is blending with bus behind it --Gower 16:23, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Anastasiya Lvova at the Learning day of Wikimedia CEE Meeting 2025. --Красный 06:47, 4 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review I would try BW, since strange mix of colors. --PetarM 11:56, 5 October 2025 (UTC)
    Probably, because of the weird mix of yellow artificial lights and natural light, but I dislike the idea of BW photographs in modern era. --Красный 14:35, 5 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Façade detail, Avenida Fontes Pereira de Melo 39, Lisbon, Portugal (by Julesvernex2) --Sebring12Hrs 04:01, 4 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Quite dark --Gower 16:23, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
    I think you're right, uploaded a brighter version, thanks! --Julesvernex2 20:18, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Pomona statue (detail) in Upper Gardens of Peterhof, Saint Petersburg, Russia. --Екатерина Борисова 03:11, 4 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Sculpture surface is not very detailed --Gower 16:23, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Dolphin fountain figure in Upper Gardens of Peterhof, Saint Petersburg, Russia. --Екатерина Борисова 03:11, 4 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Gower 14:45, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Dev Jadiya 06:55, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Dragon and Dolphin fountain figures in Upper Gardens of Peterhof, Saint Petersburg, Russia. --Екатерина Борисова 03:11, 4 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Blur --Dev Jadiya 05:58, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Big Stone Bridge and moving ship --Юрий Д.К. 00:45, 4 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Interesting composition, but bridge is not sharp, and the lights and some lit parts are overexposed/burnt. --Plozessor 03:46, 10 October 2025 (UTC)

October 3, 2025

• 
  • Nomination: 2025 Kraków, Warneńczyka 10-Rejtana 15 --Igor123121 04:55, 3 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    PC is needed. Look at the verticals at left (red/orange building) and may be a bit underexposed. --Sebring12Hrs 08:07, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
    @Sebring12Hrs:  Done :) --Igor123121 18:46, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
    Could you increase exposure a bit ? --Sebring12Hrs 20:44, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
    A bit dark. --Harmonide 00:46, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
    Returned to Nomination section. Please, use Comment if you have a comment. Lvova 09:29, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
     Done --Igor123121 17:17, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Ireland, Clonmacnoise, Temple Melaghlin --Berthold Werner 15:57, 3 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Some CAs on the walls, especially at left. Otherwise good. --Sebring12Hrs 20:34, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
    Isn't it a bit tilted? --Harmonide 00:32, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
    Returned to Nomination section. Please, use Comment if you have a comment. Lvova 09:26, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Theresiastraat in The Hague --ReneeWrites 22:30, 3 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Perspective correction needed. --Gower 13:58, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Bosch Performance Lince CX mid-mounted bicycle motor at IAA Mobility 2025 --MB-one 21:43, 3 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Dev Jadiya 05:58, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: 2025 Poznań, Kamienica Grodzickich --Igor123121 04:55, 3 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Distorted (due to perspective correction I suppose). Judging by the other photos in the category, the upper part of the portal should be horizontal, but here it's concave. --Екатерина Борисова 05:17, 3 October 2025 (UTC)
    @Екатерина Борисова:  Done --Igor123121 06:07, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
    Sorry, but it's still concave. --Екатерина Борисова 02:37, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Port of Thessaloniki --Lvova 00:03, 3 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
    The board is a little crooked --Gower 13:58, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
    Tnx, check now pls. --Lvova 15:47, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
    Looks good to me --Kritzolina 19:18, 10 October 2025 (UTC)

October 2, 2025

• 
  • Nomination Manhole cover at Artyom street. Almaty, Kazakhstan. --Красный 20:06, 2 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Gower 16:23, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Dev Jadiya 06:55, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Mercedes-Benz C174 350 4Matic at IAA 2025 --Alexander-93 10:26, 2 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Discussion
     Oppose Not sharp enough --Dev Jadiya 05:58, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
    In my opinion, the car is sharp. Please discuss. --Alexander-93 09:08, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Street "Bielkenhagen" in the old town of Stralsund, a Unesco site --MB-one 08:56, 2 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Maybe different cropping to eliminate bottom shadow? --Gower 16:23, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination 2025, Kraków, Cmentarz Rakowicki w Krakowie --Igor123121 05:18, 2 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Dev Jadiya 05:58, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Black rhinoceros (Diceros bicornis), Lake Nakuru National Park, Kenya --Poco a poco 04:25, 2 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Blur --Dev Jadiya 05:58, 9 October 2025 (UTC)

October 1, 2025

• 
  • Nomination Malooti Terracotta Temple - By User:Saikat Surai --Sumitsurai 16:55, 1 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Romzig 18:03, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: View over Thessaloniki from Pyrgos Aliseos --Kritzolina 09:45, 1 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    A bit too dark on the settlement IMO --MB-one 11:59, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: UlicaGenerałaStanisławaSosabowskiego-ŚcieżkiRowerowe-PrądnikBiały-POL, Kraków --Igor123121 05:45, 1 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    It needs a perspective correction --Poco a poco 08:45, 1 October 2025 (UTC)
    @Poco a poco:  Done --Igor123121 06:23, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
    Better now, there is though some noise and CA, can you please remove them? --Poco a poco 06:22, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
    Not very detailed but acceptable. --Gower 14:45, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination National Holiday of the Third of May 2025, Jan Matejko Square, Kraków, Poland --Igor123121 05:45, 1 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Main topic is not well exposed, only flags and people in the background. --Gower 19:10, 9 October 2025 (UTC)

September 30, 2025

• 
  • Nomination: A water pump in the Natur-Park Schöneberger Südgelände --FlocciNivis 16:29, 30 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Color grading reminds analogue vintage picture, it is intentional? CA (wires) --Gower 16:23, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Volkswagen stand at IAA Open Space 2023 in Munich --MB-one 13:17, 30 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Little CA on WV logo. --Gower 14:45, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

September 29, 2025

• 
  • Nomination: Common snipe (Gallinago gallinago faeroeensis) --Charlesjsharp 08:36, 29 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    low contrast and strange WB (too purple) IMO --George Chernilevsky 20:28, 29 September 2025 (UTC)
    Very nice. But I agree for the low contrast. Can it be fixed? --Harmonide 00:22, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
    Returned to Nomination section. Please, use Comment if you have a comment. Lvova 09:28, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: The house at the Rheinallee 61 in Mainz --FlocciNivis 17:17, 29 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    The bottom crop is too tight. --Sebring12Hrs 08:04, 6 October 2025 (UTC)

September 26, 2025

• 
  • Nomination: Christo Botewa street, view from E, Kraków, Poland --Igor123121 07:58, 26 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Probably it's possible to crop the right side - there is a PC problem and anyway this lifting edge is just sticking out. --Lvova 20:38, 2 October 2025 (UTC)
    @Lvova:  Done --Igor123121 06:23, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
    Probably you didn't upload it. --Lvova 08:53, 6 October 2025 (UTC)

September 25, 2025

• 
  • Nomination National Museum, Main Building, 1 May, 3 Avenue, Kraków, Poland --Igor123121 17:43, 25 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline
    Right side and bottom part of the image are blurry. --Екатерина Борисова 03:57, 29 September 2025 (UTC)
    @Екатерина Борисова:  Done --Igor123121 06:23, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
    No. You just cropped the image a bit, but the bottom and especially the right side of building are still blurry. --Екатерина Борисова 02:50, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
     Oppose Per Екатерина Борисова. Also a little bit strange artefacts in the sky. --Lvova 17:41, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Creative bicycle at VELOBerlin 2024 --MB-one 15:30, 25 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline
    Are details on the chain and wheels fixable? --Lvova 20:32, 2 October 2025 (UTC)
     Oppose Issues not addressed. --E bailey 15:12, 9 October 2025 (UTC)

September 24, 2025

• 
  • Nomination ePerformance electric power boat --MB-one 17:10, 24 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Withdrawn
    Wheels and the area behind the boat look not good. --Lvova 20:25, 2 October 2025 (UTC)
    As above, too much chaos behind the boat and a man half-cut in the background. --Gower 14:45, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
    You are both correct.  I withdraw my nomination Thank you for the reviews. --MB-one 13:28, 9 October 2025 (UTC)

Consensual review

Rules

These rules are in accordance with the procedures normally followed in this section. If you don’t agree with them please feel free to propose changes.

• To ask for consensual review, just change the /Promotion, /Decline to /Discuss and add your comments immediately following the review. An automatic bot will move it to the consensual review section within one day. Alternatively move the image line from the main queue to Consensual Review/Images and follow the instructions in the edit window.
• You can move an image here if you contest the decision of the reviewer or have doubts about its eligibility (in which case an 'oppose' is assumed). In any case, please explain your reasons. Our QICBot will move it for you. When the bot moves it, you might have to revisit the nomination and expand your review into the Consensual Review format and add "votes".
• The decision is taken by majority of opinions, including the one of the first reviewer and excluding the nominator's. After a minimum period of 48 hours since the last entry, the decision will be registered at the end of the text using the template {{QICresult}} and then executed, according to the Guidelines.

Using {{support}} or {{oppose}} will make it easier to count your vote.

Votes by anonymous contributors aren't counted

• In case of draw, or if no additional opinions are given other than the first reviewer's, the nomination can be closed as inconclusive after 8 days, counted from its entry.
• Turn any existing comments into bullet points—add  Oppose and  Support if necessary.
• Add a comment explaining why you've moved the image here - be careful to stay inside the braces.
• Preview and save with a sensible edit summary like "+Image:Example.jpg".

File:1002_Arc_de_Triomphe_in_Paris_at_night_Photo_by_Giles_Laurent.jpg

• Nomination Arc de Triomphe in Paris at night --Giles Laurent 10:23, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Oppose This perspective is not acceptable to me. --Sebring12Hrs 10:58, 10 October 2025 (UTC)

  Thank you for your review but I respectfully disagree. It's a real life perspective just as you see it with the human eye. Perspective corrected edits make the monument look unatural in my eyes and I would like to keep it natural. Moreover, this natural perspective enhances the height and majesty of the monument in my opinion. -- Giles Laurent 21:36, 10 October 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Decline?   --Lvova 08:25, 11 October 2025 (UTC)

File:1003_Arc_de_Triomphe_in_Paris_at_night_long_exposure_Photo_by_Giles_Laurent.jpg

• Nomination Arc de Triomphe in Paris at night long exposure --Giles Laurent 10:23, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Oppose This perspective is not acceptable to me. --Sebring12Hrs 10:58, 10 October 2025 (UTC)

  Thank you for your review but I respectfully disagree. It's a real life perspective just as you see it with the human eye. Perspective corrected edits make the monument look unatural in my eyes and I would like to keep it natural. Moreover, this natural perspective enhances the height and majesty of the monument in my opinion. -- Giles Laurent 21:36, 10 October 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Decline?   --Lvova 08:25, 11 October 2025 (UTC)

File:1014_Pont_du_Gard_Photo_by_Giles_Laurent.jpg

• Nomination Aerial view of Pont du Gard, France --Giles Laurent 10:23, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Support Good quality. --Argenberg 10:45, 10 October 2025 (UTC)

  Was not marked, but definitely a support voice. Lvova 08:24, 11 October 2025 (UTC)

•  Oppose Overprocessed. --Sebring12Hrs 11:03, 10 October 2025 (UTC)

  Thank you for your review Sebring12Hrs but I respectfully disagree. It's a very high resolution shot that was taken with a drone as it's the only way to achieve this. Compare it with this downsized version to see that sharpness in the given conditions is more than acceptable for QI imo -- Giles Laurent 21:33, 10 October 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → More votes?   --Lvova 08:24, 11 October 2025 (UTC)

File:1016_Château_de_la_Napoule_at_sunset_Photo_by_Giles_Laurent.jpg

• Nomination Château de la Napoule at sunset, France --Giles Laurent 10:23, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Oppose Overprocessed. --Sebring12Hrs 11:01, 10 October 2025 (UTC)

  Thank you for your review but I respectfully disagree. It's a very high resolution shot that was taken in low light conditions with a drone as it's the only way to achieve this. Compare it with this downsized version to see that sharpness in the given conditions is more than acceptable for QI imo -- Giles Laurent 21:29, 10 October 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Decline?   --Lvova 08:23, 11 October 2025 (UTC)

File:Meursault_-_Château-fort_-_2.jpg

• Nomination Meursault (Côte-d'Or, France) - Old castle (now hosting the town hall) --Benjism89 06:51, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
• This needs perspective correction. Could this be done? --AFBorchert 10:09, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Support It doesn't need any PC, but may be is a bit blurred at full size, ok at 2 560 × 2 048 pixels. --Sebring12Hrs 11:29, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose Agree with AFBorchert, it is distorted. And yes, not sharp. --Lvova 18:02, 10 October 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → More votes?   --Lvova 08:22, 11 October 2025 (UTC)

File:Barbudo_cabecirrojo_(Trachyphonus_erythrocephalus),_parque_nacional_de_Tarangire,_Tanzania,_2024-05-25,_DD_79.jpg

• Nomination Red-and-yellow barbet (Trachyphonus erythrocephalus), Serengeti Tarangire National Park, Tanzania --Poco a poco 06:37, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Support Good quality. --Benjism89 06:59, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose The eyes are out of focus, which is important for animal photography. --Lvova 18:06, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Support Good quality --Jakubhal 08:04, 11 October 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote?   --Lvova 08:21, 11 October 2025 (UTC)

File:Barbudo_cabecirrojo_(Trachyphonus_erythrocephalus),_parque_nacional_de_Tarangire,_Tanzania,_2024-05-25,_DD_82.jpg

• Nomination Red-and-yellow barbet (Trachyphonus erythrocephalus), Serengeti Tarangire National Park, Tanzania --Poco a poco 06:37, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Support Good quality. --Benjism89 06:59, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose Noisy. --Lvova 18:06, 10 October 2025 (UTC)

  Nonsense. Do you actually care about the offered res? what noise would I see in your 12 MPx shots if you upscale them to the res I offer? --Poco a poco 22:01, 10 October 2025 (UTC)

  I already told for several times that I am not downscaling, so if you don't see noise in the maximal resolution - there is no a version with the noise. Nonsense is your reaction. You are pushing images with such words against everyone who say that you're not ideal. Lvova 08:21, 11 October 2025 (UTC)

•  Support Good quality --Jakubhal 08:05, 11 October 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote?   --Lvova 08:21, 11 October 2025 (UTC)

File:Barbudo_cabecirrojo_(Trachyphonus_erythrocephalus),_parque_nacional_de_Tarangire,_Tanzania,_2024-05-25,_DD_83.jpg

• Nomination Red-and-yellow barbet (Trachyphonus erythrocephalus), Serengeti Tarangire National Park, Tanzania --Poco a poco 06:37, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Oppose Magnificent bird, but not very sharp head and its eye unfortunately. --Gower 14:51, 10 October 2025 (UTC)

  I applied some sharpening, this pic deserves the QI stamp --Poco a poco 21:50, 10 October 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Decline?   --Lvova 08:17, 11 October 2025 (UTC)

File:Kazan_Voronkov_—_Kalyagin_House_Detail_2024-07-14_1665.jpg

• Nomination Kazan Voronkov — Kalyagin House Detail --Mike1979 Russia 06:36, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Support Good quality. --Gower 08:48, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose Too soft, sorry. --Lvova 18:07, 10 October 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → More votes?   --Lvova 08:17, 11 October 2025 (UTC)

File:2025,_Kraków,_Kościół_Najświętszego_Serca_Pana_Jezusa,_ul._Kopernika_(12).jpg

• Nomination 2025, Kraków, Kościół Najświętszego Serca Pana Jezusa, ul. Kopernika --Igor123121 05:10, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion Overexposed on the floor --Jacek Halicki 06:24, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose Blur --Dev Jadiya 06:27, 10 October 2025 (UTC)

  @Jacek Halicki:  Done --Igor123121 14:06, 10 October 2025 (UTC)

•  Oppose Sorry, it is a bit better, but still there are huge overexposed areas on the floor. I don't think it is fixable here --Jakubhal 08:07, 11 October 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline?   --Lvova 08:16, 11 October 2025 (UTC)

File:Demi_Vollering_-_2025_European_road_championship_podium_-_Guilherand-Granges.jpg

• Nomination Demi Vollering vainqueure de la course en ligne des championnats d'Europe 2025 à Guilherand-Granges.Moi, en tant que détenteur des droits d’auteur sur cette œuvre, je la publie sous la licence suivante :La réalisation de ce document a été parrainée par Wikimédia France. (Proposez un projet !). By User:Kakoula10 --Shougissime 18:56, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
• Nice, but not very sharp face. --Gower 19:03, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Support Hm... the focus is apparently on the tasty gold medal. Nonetheless, I still think that this is good enough for QI. --AFBorchert 20:16, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• But a bit noisy and for a portrait it's bad that the focus is not on eyes. It is NOT an oppose voice, but I would like to read more opinions. --Lvova 09:42, 10 October 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promote?   --Lvova 08:15, 11 October 2025 (UTC)

File:Anochecer_en_la_zona_de_conservación_de_Ngorongoro,_Tanzania,_2024-05-27,_DD_66-68_HDR.jpg

• Nomination Sunset at Ngorongoro Conservation Area, Tanzania --Poco a poco 07:14, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Oppose Main theme: sunset is barely visible. It's mostly trees. --Gower 18:57, 9 October 2025 (UTC)

  Subject extended to the trees --Poco a poco 22:23, 10 October 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Decline?   --Lvova 08:14, 11 October 2025 (UTC)

File:Avestruz_(Struthio_camelus),_zona_de_conservación_de_Ngorongoro,_Tanzania,_2024-05-27,_DD_33.jpg

• Nomination Common ostrich (Struthio camelus), Ngorongoro Conservation Area, Tanzania --Poco a poco 07:14, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Oppose Subject not in focus. --E bailey 14:37, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose Ostrich not very sharp. --Gower 17:25, 9 October 2025 (UTC)

  Sorry guys, this reviews are not fine. It's a wild shot taken with a 600mm lens, I still applied more sharpness, QI to me if I know what this is about --Poco a poco 22:30, 10 October 2025 (UTC)

  But the fact about hardness of photoshooting is unrelated to sharpness, in my opinion you also often nominate pictures that are unsharp - I stopped to comment because of your reaction. This photo has problems with the colors of the neck now. Lvova 08:14, 11 October 2025 (UTC)

  I’ll add this right away. These pages often mention that there are conditions in which QI cannot be achieved - for example, specific museum conditions or photos of buildings on very narrow streets. This is just a given, which doesn’t mean the photos are bad or useless; they simply don’t fit the QI criteria. But for some reason, you think that outside the rules, we should make an exception for wildlife shots taken with a telephoto lens; traditionally, this often works, especially since you can reference the fact that many of your images have been accepted under this approach.

  Additionally, you refer to the equipment of the people evaluating your work. Indeed, my camera has far more technical limitations than yours; there are situations where it’s pointless for me to shoot even for illustrative purposes, without aiming for QI. However, I’m getting better at understanding these conditions and limitations and achieving results without trying to say, "Come on, look at how tough the conditions were for a phone camera". Your equipment has fewer limitations, but there are still some. Don’t rely on authority instead of simply accepting its limitations. Lvova 09:21, 11 October 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline?   --Lvova 08:14, 11 October 2025 (UTC)

File:Avestruz_(Struthio_camelus),_zona_de_conservación_de_Ngorongoro,_Tanzania,_2024-05-27,_DD_42.jpg

• Nomination Common ostrich (Struthio camelus), Ngorongoro Conservation Area, Tanzania --Poco a poco 07:14, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Oppose Nice view, but ostrich isn't very sharp --Gower 17:49, 9 October 2025 (UTC)

  Not required in my opinion, but still I applied more sharpness --Poco a poco 22:34, 10 October 2025 (UTC)

•  Support Good now. Lvova 08:11, 11 October 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → More votes?   --Lvova 08:11, 11 October 2025 (UTC)

File:2025_Genesis_GV60_Automesse_Ludwigsburg_2025_DSC_2528.jpg

• Nomination Genesis GV60 at Automesse Ludwigsburg 2025 --Alexander-93 17:55, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Oppose Blur --Dev Jadiya 05:58, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Support Good quality IMO --George Chernilevsky 07:08, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Support The main object is nice. Lvova 08:08, 11 October 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote?   --Lvova 08:08, 11 October 2025 (UTC)

File:20225,_Kraków,_Cmentarz_Rakowicki_w_Krakowie,_1.jpg

• Nomination 2025, Kraków, Cmentarz Rakowicki w Krakowie --Igor123121 05:18, 2 October 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Oppose Tilted, chromatic aberration, overexposed or burned out highlights on mausoleum --Gower 19:10, 9 October 2025 (UTC)

  @Gower:  Done --Igor123121 17:17, 10 October 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Decline?   --Lvova 08:07, 11 October 2025 (UTC)

File:Rinoceronte_negro_(Diceros_bicornis),_parque_nacional_del_lago_Nakuru,_Kenia,_2024-05-18,_DD_75.jpg

• Nomination Black rhinoceros (Diceros bicornis), Lake Nakuru National Park, Kenya --Poco a poco 04:25, 2 October 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Oppose Not sharp enough --Dev Jadiya 05:58, 9 October 2025 (UTC)

  I would like to discuss this one --Poco a poco 06:58, 10 October 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Decline?   --Lvova 08:06, 11 October 2025 (UTC)

File:Apatura ilia male lateral Bytom.jpg

• Nomination Apatura ilia male, lateral view. --Gower 17:43, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Oppose May be a bit too much color noise. --Sebring12Hrs 18:04, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Support QI to me --Cvmontuy 01:18, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Sebring12Hrs. Lvova 09:45, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• Would support if noise will be reduced. Юрий Д.К. 02:01, 11 October 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline?   --Lvova 09:45, 10 October 2025 (UTC)

File:Neoscona_oaxacensis_Coacalco_251004p1.jpg

• Nomination Neoscona oaxacensis, Western Spotted Orb Weaver, Coacalco, Mexico, length 3 cm aproximately: --Cvmontuy 17:15, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Oppose Very nice, but overprocessed. There is a bizarre blur around the spider's limbs. --Gower 17:49, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Support Not ideal, but good. --Lvova 19:34, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose As I am currently experimenting with focus stacking myself, I know how difficult it is to create good images with this technique. But if the stacking doesn't work 100%, the image won't be good and, in my opinion, it won't be good enough for QI. The transitions from sharp to blurred areas were also not done cleanly in post-processing.
  Your used camera can do focus bracketing by firmware, but I don't know how many images are possible and at what focal steps. IMO, at least 12-15 individual images are necessary for such a subject in order to get at least the front area of the subject absolutely sharp. But what is definitely not enough is aperture 8 for macro photography, especially not with a focal length of 105 mm. Actually I'm working with a 60 mm macro lens and even with this focal length, if you don't want to work deliberately with targeted blurring, you need at least f/13 to get enough DoF (hint: use a DoF calculator). An insect or a spider like this is always spectacular in close-up, of course, but it really has to be flawless. This picture here is not, I'm sorry. --Syntaxys 03:45, 11 October 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline?   --Syntaxys 03:45, 11 October 2025 (UTC)

File:Neoscona_oaxacensis_Coacalco_251004p8.jpg

• Nomination Neoscona oaxacensis, Western Spotted Orb Weaver, Coacalco, Mexico, length 3 cm aproximately: --Cvmontuy 16:30, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Oppose Nice, but overprocessed. In white spots there are weird black spots. Too high contrast. --Gower 17:25, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Support More than good quality. --Lvova 19:35, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Support IMO this one is QI, just barely ;-) --Syntaxys 03:50, 11 October 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote?   --Syntaxys 03:50, 11 October 2025 (UTC)

File:2025,_Kraków,_Cmentarz_Rakowicki_(1040).jpg

• Nomination 2025, Kraków, Cmentarz Rakowicki --Igor123121 13:29, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Oppose Totally random angle of view. Why? Lighting and sky also not favorable. --Gower 17:25, 9 October 2025 (UTC)

• Lack of concrete arguments – the comment is just mere rumination. If there is something to improve, I encourage you to formulate specific objections instead of ruminating that it could have been done better. --Igor123121 19:18, 9 October 2025 (UTC)

•  Oppose The review above is perfectly okay. There is lots of chroma noise in this image, the sky has striations and the composition and perspective are also haphazard and imbalanced. --Peulle 08:57, 10 October 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline?   --Peulle 08:53, 10 October 2025 (UTC)

File:Traben-Trarbach,_het_Rathaus_Dm_IMG_4860_2024-08-27_11.34.jpg

• Nomination Traben-Trarbach in Germany-RP, the townhall --Michielverbeek 05:15, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Oppose Blurr --Dev Jadiya 05:58, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Support Good enough for me --Jakubhal 06:35, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Support Ok for me --Uoaei1 07:42, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Support Looks fine to me. Even the flag blowing in the wind is sharp.--Peulle 08:58, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Support Good enough. --XRay 11:20, 10 October 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote?   --XRay 11:20, 10 October 2025 (UTC)

File:Traben_Trarbach,_de_Brückentor_Dm_IMG_4875_2024-08-27_12.00.jpg

• Nomination Traben Trarbach in Germnay-RP, town gate: the Brückentor --Michielverbeek 05:15, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Support Good quality. --Ermell 05:48, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose not sharp enough --Dev Jadiya 05:58, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Support Ok for me --Uoaei1 07:42, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose Too soft and a little bit distorted. Lvova 09:47, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Support Good to me. Above the QI bar. --Sebring12Hrs 10:10, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Support IMO good enough. --XRay 11:19, 10 October 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Promote?   --XRay 11:19, 10 October 2025 (UTC)

File:Traben-Trarbach,_het_Spitzhaus_Dm_met_kerk_toren_IMG_4888_2024-08-27_13.10.jpg

• Nomination Traben-Trarbach in Germany-RP, monumental house (the Spitzhaus) with churchtower --Michielverbeek 05:15, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Oppose Overprocessed --Dev Jadiya 05:58, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Support QI for me. --Uoaei1 06:25, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Support Good quality. Ok to me. --Sebring12Hrs 12:53, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Support IMO good enough. --XRay 11:18, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per Dev Jadiya, the road and center wall has no detail --Cvmontuy 12:02, 10 October 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Promote?   --XRay 11:18, 10 October 2025 (UTC)

File:Poplar_farming_Casale_sul_Sile_3.jpg

• Nomination Poplar fields near Casale sul Sile --Kallerna 04:49, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Support Good quality. --Gower 05:48, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Support Good quality. --Ermell 05:50, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose Blur --Dev Jadiya 05:58, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose Too soft. Lvova 09:49, 10 October 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → More votes?   --Lvova 09:49, 10 October 2025 (UTC)

File:Soccer_goal_at_the_beach_boulevard_of_Toroni.jpg

• Nomination Soccer goal at the beach boulevard of Toroni --Kritzolina 17:50, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Support Good quality. --Vsatinet 08:02, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose Lacks sharpness. Sorry. --Ermell 09:06, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Ermell.--Peulle 08:59, 10 October 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline?   --Peulle 08:50, 10 October 2025 (UTC)

File:Gabriel_at_Gulbenkian_Park,_Lisbon,_Portugal_(PPL1-Corrected)_julesvernex2.jpg

• Nomination Gabriel at Gulbenkian Park, Lisbon, Portugal (by Julesvernex2) --Sebring12Hrs 16:45, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 20:54, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose Out-of-focus orange rope on the right is distracting. Also, who is Gabriel? Is this a personal family snapshot that was accidentally uploaded? --GRDN711 04:21, 10 October 2025 (UTC)

• Of course not. --Julesvernex2 07:08, 11 October 2025 (UTC)

•  Oppose Also motion blur on the foot.--Peulle 09:00, 10 October 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline?   --Peulle 08:50, 10 October 2025 (UTC)

File:Raifsky_Bogoroditsky_Monastery_early_XX_century_Monk_Building_2024-07-15_1793.jpg

• Nomination Raifsky Bogoroditsky Monastery early XX century Monk Building --Mike1979 Russia 05:49, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Oppose Another perspective would work better, don't you think? --Harmonide 13:40, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

• I don't think so. What kind of perspective exactly? --Mike1979 Russia 17:17, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

•  Support QI for me. @Harmonide: I see no QI rule that covers your vote. --Uoaei1 05:24, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 10:07, 10 October 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote?   --Sebring12Hrs 10:07, 10 October 2025 (UTC)

File:Norderney,_Strand_--_2025_--_8975.jpg

• Nomination Sea foam washed up on the beach, Norderney, Lower Saxony, Germany --XRay 04:18, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Oppose Blurred --Dev Jadiya 07:32, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Support I suppose that this blur is intentional :) Maybe it's worth another discussion, maybe not, but I won't like this photo to be declined for not very convincing reasons. --Екатерина Борисова 23:31, 9 October 2025 (UTC)

• I assume a support vote. --XRay 05:56, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• You're right. The blurring is intentional. You're absolutely right. In my opinion, a photo like this wouldn't work if too much of it were in focus. After all, the aperture is f/7.1, which provides sufficient sharpness. With a significantly larger aperture (f/2, for example), there would be even less sharpness, but the overall sharpness would also decrease significantly. (We remember the critical aperture. Unfortunately, this page only exists in the German Wikipedia.) --XRay 05:54, 10 October 2025 (UTC)

•  Support high quality image with a slightly unusual but very effective focus --Kritzolina 08:15, 11 October 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → More votes?   --Peulle 08:48, 10 October 2025 (UTC)

File:Norderney,_Kurtheater_--_2025_--_8935.jpg

• Nomination “Kur-Theater” (and cinema), Norderney, Lower Saxony, Germany --XRay 05:21, 3 October 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Oppose unreasonable angle --Gower 14:45, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

• The angle may be unusual, but this can't be a reason. --XRay 05:24, 9 October 2025 (UTC)

•  Oppose I know that we sometimes experiment with unusual compositions, but I don't think this one really works. There's no category listed for special compositional choices either.--Peulle 09:02, 10 October 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline?   --Peulle 08:47, 10 October 2025 (UTC)

File:Beach_between_Tripotamos_and_Langomandra_01.jpg

• Nomination Beach between Tripotamos and Langomandra in Sithonia, Halkidiki, Greece --Kritzolina 17:50, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Support Good quality. --Юрий Д.К. 20:07, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose I don't think it's QI. I think the detail isn't good enough and I see it as underexposed. Small problem: Small problem: Without all the EXIF data--Lmbuga 23:30, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose  Underexposed. Also not too detailed, probably due high ISO and NR (but can't tell). --Plozessor 03:55, 10 October 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline?   --Plozessor 03:55, 10 October 2025 (UTC)

File:Kanał_Lindleya.jpg

• Nomination Lindley canal in Łódź, Poland by Marian Naworski--Gower 15:06, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Support Good quality. --Harmonide 16:25, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose Fascinating, but there are some chromatic aberration and noise --Jakubhal 16:38, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose Slight CA, noise, and tilt as is now. Could all be fixable with better raw conversion I guess. --Plozessor 03:57, 10 October 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline?   --Plozessor 03:57, 10 October 2025 (UTC)

File:Die_Marksburg_im_Winter.jpg

• Nomination Marksburg im Winter -- Rolf Kranz 13:17, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
   Support What a sight! --Harmonide 13:35, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose Quite nice, but a bit 'plastic' look of castle surface. Weird white halo around spires. --Gower 13:58, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

• @Gower: done.Thanks for your reviews. ---- Rolf Kranz 21:33, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

•  Support Would support this as FP candidate --Uoaei1 06:33, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Support The latest version is much better. Obvious QI for me --Jakubhal 07:03, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Support Very good -- Spurzem 11:40, 10 October 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → More votes?   --Peulle 06:46, 9 October 2025 (UTC)

File:Osthafenbrunnen,_Frankfurt_am_Main_(P1032648).jpg

• Nomination Osthafenbrunnen in Frankfurt-Ostend --MB-one 10:24, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Oppose A closer look would be better for me. --Harmonide 13:13, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

• I disagree. A full view of the object, is not a valid reason to decline. --MB-one 13:29, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

•  Support There is no need to choose between this foreshortening and theoretical another one. Good quality. --Lvova 15:37, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Support Good quality. --Alexander-93 16:23, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Neutral It's such a shame. There are exciting subjects, but cars are parked everywhere. This has become a disruptive factor for many subjects. I'm not judging this negatively, because I don't see any other way to capture the subject. But in terms of image composition, the many objects in the background are distracting. This makes the image appear restless. --XRay 11:17, 10 October 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote?   --Peulle 06:46, 9 October 2025 (UTC)

File:VDL,_Busworld_Europe_2025,_Brussels_(20251002-P1051689).jpg

• Nomination World Premiere of the VDL Futura 3, presented by Marc van Doorn (CEO) and Marloes van Pelt (Product Manager at VDL Bus & Coach), on the eve of Busworld Europe 2025 --MB-one 10:24, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Oppose As a portrait - not very accurate. As a depiction of a bus - either. --Gower 16:23, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose I go with Gower. --Harmonide 16:40, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Support I disagree. At least the bus is perfectly captured. --Lmbuga 21:13, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

• CAs at top (top right corner of the bus) --Lmbuga 21:28, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

•  Question Does that mean you oppose or are you still supporting? --Peulle 06:46, 9 October 2025 (UTC)

•  Support Technically ok, the minor CA at the spotlight can be ignored. But who is the lady? Might also need personality rights template. (We know from the category who the man is, but probably should also mention him in the description.) --Plozessor 04:01, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
  •  Done Added the names of the depicted people and their function to the caption. Thanks for the review. --MB-one 09:26, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Support The overall contrast could be a bit more balanced, but overall QI --Syntaxys 04:04, 11 October 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Promote?   --Syntaxys 04:04, 11 October 2025 (UTC)

File:CEEM_2025,_Второй_день_(27).jpg

• Nomination Amir Sarabadani. Second day of Wikimedia CEE Meeting 2025. --Красный 08:59, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Comment Could be croped above. --PetarM 10:36, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Support Good quality. --Harmonide 12:53, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

• @Harmonide: Please, do not promote images with unanswered/unresolved comments. Per PetarM --Jakubhal 16:43, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

• @Jakubhal I did promote. Forgot to put s. --PetarM 17:22, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

•  Oppose Well, I still have issues with this photo. Awkward bottom framing with most of the arms, but with cut-off hands is one. There are also some green CA on the blouse --Jakubhal 18:03, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → More votes?   --Peulle 06:46, 9 October 2025 (UTC)

File:Scholari_11.jpg

• Nomination Scholari --Lvova 08:25, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Support OK. --Harmonide 13:35, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose Large unfavorable shadow in the foreground --Gower 13:58, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

• I don't think it was a problem, but it also wasn't smth too important, so cropped. --Lvova 15:35, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

•  Support The image would be acceptable in first version IMO, but this version is better --Jakubhal 04:24, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Support --Kritzolina 08:18, 11 October 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → More votes?   --Peulle 06:46, 9 October 2025 (UTC)

File:Cráter_volcánico,_zona_de_conservación_de_Ngorongoro,_Tanzania,_2024-05-27,_DD_11.jpg

• Nomination Volcanic crater, Ngorongoro Conservation Area, Tanzania --Poco a poco 07:57, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 10:02, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Support Good quality. --Benjism89 10:08, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose Seems quite blurry to me, sorry. --Harmonide 13:35, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote?   --Peulle 06:46, 9 October 2025 (UTC)

File:2025,_Kraków,_Ulica_Stolarska_11_(3).jpg

• Nomination 2025, Kraków, Ulica Stolarska 11 (3) --Igor123121 06:57, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Oppose This time I let you include a more specific category (windows?) --Poco a poco 08:04, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose What exactly is supposed to be in focus here? --Harmonide 13:13, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

• @Harmonide: Sorry, but I don’t understand where you see the problem. The photo is technically well taken and shows a detail of the building. Could you clarify why you voted against it? --Igor123121 14:38, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

•  Support What's a day today :) Igor123121, please, don't change the status to comment back if there is a voice... But I agree that technically it is a quality image of the building's details. --Lvova 15:21, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 16:53, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 21:36, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Comment I thought the QI guidelines mention something about proper description and categories, I see windows here, a category should be added. Poco a poco 22:08, 10 October 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Promote?   --Peulle 06:48, 9 October 2025 (UTC)

File:2025,_Kraków,_Ulica_Karmelicka_1_(3).jpg

• Nomination 2025, Kraków, Ulica Karmelicka 1 (3) --Igor123121 06:57, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 10:03, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Comment Strange texture in the sky at the top right. A bit overexposed. And no clear composition (looks like the building is cut off on the right but not on the left, why ? And why a photograph of only the top of this building, is there something we should notice ? etc) --Benjism89 10:14, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose Agree with the criticism above. --Harmonide 12:53, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

  @Harmonide: Sorry, but I don’t understand where you see the problem. The photo is technically well taken and shows a detail of the building. Could you clarify why you voted against it? --Igor123121 14:38, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

  By the way, he wrote about right top corner of the sky. Lvova 15:33, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

•  Support As far as I see, the sky is fixed, QI imho. Lvova 16:01, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose Overprocessed. Look at the limit between the roof and the sky. --Sebring12Hrs 16:52, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Weak support after the sky and overexposure were fixed. Still a random composition and a bit overprocessed --Benjism89 05:59, 9 October 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Promote?   --Benjism89 05:59, 9 October 2025 (UTC)

File:Raifsky_Bogoroditsky_Monastery_Saints_of_Sinay_and_Raifa_Refectory_Church_2024-07-15_1791.jpg

• Nomination Raifsky Bogoroditsky Monastery Saints of Sinay and Raifa Refectory Church --Mike1979 Russia 05:49, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Support Good quality. --Tisha Mukherjee 06:44, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose Too much sky, and not enough ground. Is it possible to find a balance? --Harmonide 13:40, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• Composition changed --Mike1979 Russia 09:05, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 18:37, 10 October 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote?   --Sebring12Hrs 18:37, 10 October 2025 (UTC)

File:Norderney,_Buhne_--_2025_--_9246.jpg

• Nomination Groyne at western head, Norderney, Lower Saxony, Germany --XRay 04:22, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• Decline
•  Support Beautifully rendered. --Harmonide 13:40, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose Only the closest groyne is sharp. --Gower 13:58, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose Aaarrgh the only "in focus" area is a bit blurred. Sorry to decline. --Sebring12Hrs 21:26, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Sebring12Hrs 10:01, 11 October 2025 (UTC)

File:Shiva_Mahashivaratri_2025423.jpg

• Nomination A devotee in Lord Shiva attire during Mahashivaratri --I.Mahesh 04:16, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Support Incredible. --Harmonide 13:40, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose Technically not a quality image. --Lvova 15:18, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose I agree with Lvova, very small DoF with only part of nose sharp. Eyes are not --Jakubhal 16:45, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose per other opposers --Uoaei1 13:42, 9 October 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Decline?   --Uoaei1 13:42, 9 October 2025 (UTC)

File:Shiva_Mahashivaratri_2025333.jpg

• Nomination Devotee in Lord SHiva attire --I.Mahesh 04:16, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Support Good job. --Harmonide 13:40, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose Technically not a quality image. --Lvova 15:18, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose Small DoF with small part sharp, noise --Jakubhal 16:49, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Support Good image -- Spurzem 12:31, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose per other opposers --Uoaei1 13:43, 9 October 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Decline?   --Uoaei1 13:43, 9 October 2025 (UTC)

File:Mahashivaratri_Varanasi_2025._56.jpg

• Nomination Shiva attire captured at Varanasi --I.Mahesh 04:16, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:41, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Support Impressive. --Harmonide 16:40, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose The same as above: impressive, yes, but technically not good. --Lvova 16:51, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose Unsharp, noise --Jakubhal 16:53, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Support Very good image though the nose is not very sharp if I see it more than life-size -- Spurzem 12:28, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose per other opposers --Uoaei1 13:43, 9 October 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → More votes?   --Uoaei1 13:43, 9 October 2025 (UTC)

File:People_on_the_Learning_day_of_CEEM_2025,_05.jpg

• Nomination Helga Vranos (Κommissarische Leiterin der Bibliothek) during the Learning day of CEEM 2025 --Lvova 07:08, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Support Good quality. Please add a {{Personality rights}} template to the file description. --AFBorchert 10:12, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose The bookshelf is tilted, it can be fixed. --Gower 16:23, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

•  Done Check now. --Lvova 16:42, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → More votes?   --Peulle 07:25, 9 October 2025 (UTC)

File:Hermeskeil,_katholische_Pfarrkirche_Sankt_Martin_Dm_IMG_4776_2024-08-25_18.14.jpg

• Nomination Hermeskeil in Germany-RP, catolic church: Pfarrkirche Sankt Martin --Michielverbeek 05:06, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Support Good quality, but not very sharp (top of the tower) --Gower 18:40, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose A little bit distorted, a little bit unsharp, a little bit noisy. --Lvova 10:07, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → More votes?   --Peulle 07:25, 9 October 2025 (UTC)

File:Santa_Maria_del_Carmine,_Milan.jpg

• Nomination The Church of Santa Maria del Carmine, Milan --Julian Lupyan 23:33, 5 October 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Oppose PC is needed. --Sebring12Hrs 11:23, 6 October 2025 (UTC)

• @Lmbuga Would you mind clarifying what PC stands for? I could not find it in Commons:Photography terms --Julian Lupyan 13:08, 6 October 2025 (UTC)

• perspective correction. Lvova 14:54, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
• @Julian Lupyan: , I will reply on your discussion page.--Lmbuga 11:54, 7 October 2025 (UTC)

•  Done @Sebring12Hrs: PC done + sharpened. Please let me know if I should change anything further --Julian Lupyan 22:41, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
• I think it has a chance in CR as far as the quthor tries to fix problems. --Lvova 10:00, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Comment Perspective is good, but some areas are blurred, this is not very sharp IMO. --Sebring12Hrs 20:02, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• @Sebring12Hrs: @Lvova: Sharpened a little bit more, I cannot sharpen any further. If it still isn't sharp enough I understand --Julian Lupyan 23:26, 10 October 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Decline?   --Peulle 07:25, 9 October 2025 (UTC)

File:Chatham_Cenotaph,_Chatham,_Ontario,_2025-07-06_03.jpg

• Nomination Chatham Cenotaph, Chatham, Ontario, 2025-07-06 --Crisco 1492 14:18, 5 October 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Comment Nice photo, but I see what looks like a speck of dust near the sculpture's right elbow. --Vsatinet 14:52, 5 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Support Good quality, no doubt. --Harmonide 00:46, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose Until an answer to the question about that dot. --Lvova 09:58, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → More votes?   --Peulle 07:25, 9 October 2025 (UTC)

File:Tournus_-_Rue_du_Docteur_Privey_-_2.jpg

• Nomination Tournus (Saône-et-Loire, France) - Doctor Privey street --Benjism89 09:42, 4 October 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Oppose The blurred plate ruins the picture IMO. Could you do another try ? --Sebring12Hrs 20:29, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Support Good quality. --Harmonide 00:46, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose Nice composition, but I also think it's blurry. --Lvova 09:54, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose CA and burned out sky. --Gower 14:45, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Decline?   --Peulle 07:25, 9 October 2025 (UTC)

File:2025_Kraków,_Zespół_magazynów_artyleryjskich_Twierdzy_Kraków_(zbrojownia_twierdzy)_1.jpg

• Nomination 2025 Kraków, Zespół magazynów artyleryjskich Twierdzy Kraków (zbrojownia twierdzy) --Igor123121 06:59, 4 October 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
• Can jou create more space in the bottom? The trees are cut --Michielverbeek 07:22, 4 October 2025 (UTC)

• @Michielverbeek: Sorry, but I no longer have the original :( --Igor123121 06:04, 6 October 2025 (UTC)

•  Oppose As above, too little space at the bottom. --Gower 14:45, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

• unjustified - the photo shows the building, not the street and sidewalk --Igor123121 17:04, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Decline?   --Peulle 07:25, 9 October 2025 (UTC)

File:Grocery_store,_Dona_Estefânia_Street,_Lisbon,_Portugal_julesvernex2.jpg

• Nomination Grocery store, Dona Estefânia Street, Lisbon, Portugal (by Julesvernex2) --Sebring12Hrs 04:01, 4 October 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Oppose Too shadowy from the left and at the bottom. Main theme is not well exposed. --Gower 14:45, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

• As the file description suggests, this image shows a grocery store in Dona Estefânia, a traditional Lisbon street. Accordingly, the dappled light emphasises the groceries and traditional azulejos, while hiding away the fridge magnets and other touristy paraphernalia inside the store --Julesvernex2 15:08, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

•  Oppose Very unfortunate lighting, too harsh shadow -- Spurzem 12:34, 9 October 2025 (UTC)

• The lightning was not unfortunate, quite the contrary: without the dappled effect I wouldn't even have bothered to take the photo! Most people these days prefer bright images with light shadows (this is why most smartphones produce such images), but I urge reviewers to set their aesthetic preferences aside. Using the full range of tones is a well established technique that goes back to the good ol' days of film dodging and burning. --Julesvernex2 15:12, 9 October 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline?   --Peulle 07:25, 9 October 2025 (UTC)

File:Animals_of_Thessaloniki_07.jpg

• Nomination Sphingidae caterpillar in Thessaloniki. --Lvova 00:05, 4 October 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Oppose Mediocre quality and way of presentation of specimen. We have much better photos of that species. --Gower 18:40, 7 October 2025 (UTC)

• 'we have other photos' is not an argument here. --Lvova 09:49, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

•  Oppose Too shallow depth of field. At least the caterpillar, which is a small part of the whole image here, should be entirely in focus. Jakubhal 04:22, 10 October 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Decline?   --Peulle 07:25, 9 October 2025 (UTC)

File:Scholari_23.jpg

• Nomination A dog in Scholari --Lvova 00:05, 4 October 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Oppose Unacceptable perspective. --Gower 18:40, 7 October 2025 (UTC)

• I don't think so. --Lvova 09:49, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

•  Oppose Very poor composition. Sorry -- Spurzem 12:38, 9 October 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Decline?   --Peulle 07:25, 9 October 2025 (UTC)

File:Harbour,_Ribnitz-Damgarten_(LRM_20240511_132516).jpg

• Nomination Sailboats in the harbour of Ribnitz --MB-one 21:43, 3 October 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Oppose The Sky is really noisy. --Syntaxys 02:31, 4 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Support Good quality. --Harmonide 00:46, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Syntaxys. --Lvova 09:48, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Comment I think a slight PC is needed too. --Sebring12Hrs 14:35, 10 October 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline?   --Sebring12Hrs 14:35, 10 October 2025 (UTC)

File:2024_Most_nad_Nysą_Kłodzką_w_Przyłęku_(09).jpg

• Nomination Bridge in Przyłęk 5 --Jacek Halicki 06:51, 3 October 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Support Good quality. --MB-one 13:03, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose Nice but bridge pillar is burned out --Gower 14:45, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Support after correction, it's acceptable --Gower 08:31, 10 October 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → More votes?   --Peulle 07:25, 9 October 2025 (UTC)

File:Bazylika_Narodzenia_Najświętszej_Maryi_Panny_w_Gietrzwałdzie,_2025,_KsP_007.jpg

• Nomination Gietrzwałd, Bazylika Narodzenia Najświętszej Maryi Panny w GietrzwałdzieJa, właściciel praw autorskich do tego dzieła, udostępniam je na poniższej licencjiTa fotografia została przesłana w ramach projektu Wiki Lubi Zabytki będącego częścią inicjatywy Wiki Loves Monuments 2025. --KrzysztofPoplawski 17:12, 1 October 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
• PC is needed. --Sebring12Hrs 00:23, 2 October 2025 (UTC)

• PC  Done --KrzysztofPoplawski 07:36, 5 October 2025 (UTC)

•  Support Good quality. --AFBorchert 10:06, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose Purple CAs at left on the tree trunks. --Sebring12Hrs 17:11, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

• You are right, I overlooked that. @KrzysztofPoplawski: could you fix the CAs? --AFBorchert 09:29, 9 October 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → More votes?   --Peulle 07:34, 9 October 2025 (UTC)

File:20250502_Vienna_02.jpg

• Nomination View up the courtyard of the Paltisches Haus at the Himmelpfortgasse 15 in Vienna, Austria --FlocciNivis 16:03, 1 October 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
• pls remove those dust specks --Virtual-Pano 17:20, 1 October 2025 (UTC)

•  Done --FlocciNivis 14:32, 4 October 2025 (UTC)

•  Comment there are still two spots just to the right of the centre Virtual-Pano 20:24, 5 October 2025 (UTC)

•  Done, did I get all of them this time? Otherwise I'll give up... --FlocciNivis 17:30, 7 October 2025 (UTC)

•  Support Interesting perspective and nice blue. --Harmonide 00:32, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose Dust spots on the walls. --Sebring12Hrs 17:08, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → More votes?   --Peulle 07:34, 9 October 2025 (UTC)

File:Kazan_Peter_and_Paul_Cathedral_Bell_Tower_Колокольня_Казанского_Петропавловского_собора.jpg

• Nomination Kazan Peter and Paul Cathedral Bell Tower--AlixSaz 18:57, 30 September 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
• Dust spots. --Sebring12Hrs 00:21, 2 October 2025 (UTC)

•  Done Thank you. I have eliminated the dust stains --AlixSaz 14:55, 2 October 2025 (UTC)

•  Support Superb. --Harmonide 00:04, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose Clean now, but top is blurred and bottom too. It needs to be discussed IMO. Sorry. --Sebring12Hrs 17:08, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose Close, but not sharp throughout subject. --E bailey 15:03, 9 October 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline?   --Peulle 07:34, 9 October 2025 (UTC)

File:Naris_Crkva_svetog_Marka,_Beograd_(St._Mark's_Church,_Belgrade).jpg

• Nomination St. Marks church in Belgrade, Serbia --PetarM 17:01, 30 September 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Oppose needs PC --FlocciNivis 19:13, 30 September 2025 (UTC)

• @FlocciNivis when drone is too high, doing PD in nonsense. Or you can try to show, and you will see problem. --PetarM 16:37, 4 October 2025 (UTC)

•  Support Nice view! --Harmonide 00:04, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose Yes may be it needs PC. --Sebring12Hrs 17:06, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline?   --Peulle 07:34, 9 October 2025 (UTC)

File:O3_Business_Campus,_Opolska_Street,_Kraków,_Poland.jpg

• Nomination O3 Business Campus, Opolska Street, Kraków, Poland --Igor123121 05:11, 29 September 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Comment Perspective distortion --Jakubhal 05:34, 29 September 2025 (UTC)

• @Jakubhal:  Done --Igor123121 06:23, 6 October 2025 (UTC)

•  Support Good quality. --Harmonide 00:22, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose Sorry, but there is still a problem, buildings on the sides are leaning --Jakubhal 18:07, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose Agree with Jakubhal --E bailey 14:55, 9 October 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline?   --Peulle 07:34, 9 October 2025 (UTC)

File:Balloon_Cup_2025_-_AMX_International_(51-34).jpg

• Nomination AMX International (51-34) of the 51st Wing at the second edition of the Balloon Cup, Piacenza-San Damiano airport, September 2025 --Hotolmo22 16:05, 28 September 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
• The horizon is slightly tilted. --Lvova 20:55, 2 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Support Good! --Harmonide 00:04, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose As it said. --Lvova 09:42, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose Text and markings on airplane are not sharp. And agree with Lvova --E bailey 15:00, 9 October 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline?   --Peulle 07:34, 9 October 2025 (UTC)

File:V-P_08618_GER_Muenster_Lamberti_church_with_Himmelsleiter_seen_from_Prinzipalmarkt.jpg

• Nomination Prinzipalmarkt and St Lamberti with light installation 'Himmelsleiter' --Virtual-Pano 08:06, 28 September 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
• Please remove the white line at the top edge and the sky is a bit noisy, other ok. --Sebring12Hrs 19:52, 5 October 2025 (UTC)

•  Done thx - for the hint Virtual-Pano 23:12, 5 October 2025 (UTC)

• Ok for the white line, but the sky is posterized now. Sorry. --Sebring12Hrs 22:11, 7 October 2025 (UTC)

•  Support Interesting shot. Almost magical. --Harmonide 00:04, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose Don't cancel my vote. --Sebring12Hrs 17:05, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → More votes?   --Peulle 07:34, 9 October 2025 (UTC)

File:2025,_Kraków,_Ulica_Mikołajska_14_(2).jpg

• Nomination 2025, Kraków, Ulica Mikołajska 14 (2) --Igor123121 16:23, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 17:08, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose Nice photo, but parallel to window, frontal perspective would be better. --Gower 17:46, 7 October 2025 (UTC)

• @Gower: I’m aware of that, but I’d rather not change the perspective so drastically in the program, as it would distort the natural look of the photo. I think that although it’s not perfect in its current form, it still meets the requirements of Quality images. --Igor123121 18:06, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
• It was just a comment, now formatted as an implicit oppose by Peulle, who forgets to make such notes. Lvova 10:50, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

•  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 18:21, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose I agree with Gower. Something is off for me. -- Harmonide 13:22, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• A photo can always be better, though in my opinion this one is sufficient for QI. I don’t intend to change the perspective in the program because it would distort the image too much. Igor123121 14:45, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → More votes?   --Lvova 14:45, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

File:Kazans_Bogoroditsky_Monastery_2024-07-13_1488.jpg

• Nomination Kazans Bogoroditsky Monastery --Mike1979 Russia 07:01, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Oppose Blur and overprocessed --Dev Jadiya 07:22, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Support Not so blurred to me. --Sebring12Hrs 19:17, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose Agree, this is not sharp enough. Lvova 08:42, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• Sharpness increased, saturation decreased. --Mike1979 Russia 10:04, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Weak oppose Too cropped on the ground, sadly. -- Harmonide 13:19, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Decline?   --Lvova 14:44, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

File:20250706_Calle_San_Agustín_03.jpg

• Nomination The wooden door of the building at the Calle San Agustín 47 in Icod de los Vinos, Tenerife --FlocciNivis 10:02, 5 October 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
• Good, but vertical line (wall) of the left is a bit leaning --Lmbuga 10:27, 5 October 2025 (UTC)

   Done --FlocciNivis 17:22, 7 October 2025 (UTC)

•  Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 00:15, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose Stil a bit wonky to my eyes. --Harmonide 00:46, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Support Good image -- Spurzem 12:41, 9 October 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → More votes?   --Lvova 09:38, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

File:NW_Night_Roma_Tiburtina_Italy_Sep23_A7C_07958.jpg

• Nomination Roma Tiburtina Station at night, view from northwest, Italy --Tagooty 04:11, 5 October 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:37, 5 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose Color noise, PC not done and not very sharp. --Sebring12Hrs 20:37, 7 October 2025 (UTC)

  @Sebring12Hrs: Thanks for the review. Please see the new version with PC and NR. --Tagooty 03:09, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

•  Support I find it quite remarkable, indeed. -- Harmonide 13:17, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose sorry, but I agree with Sebring12Hrs even for the new version. Lvova 14:42, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → More votes?   --Lvova 14:42, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

File:West_AB-13_AB-11_IIT_Gandhinagar_Sep25_A7CR_07893.jpg

• Nomination West facade, Academic Blocks AB-13 and AB-11, IIT Gandhinagar, Gujarat, India --Tagooty 14:15, 29 September 2025 (UTC)
• Promotion
•  Oppose Excessive perspective correction. Not acceptable --Dev Jadiya 07:17, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Support I disagree. --Sebring12Hrs 22:10, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Support Good quality. -- Harmonide 13:47, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Support Comparing the view with File:SW AB-13 IIT Gandhinagar Gujarat Sep25 A7CR 07891.jpg, I do not think that the perspective correction is excessive. The tapering of the balcony is correct, for instance. --Harlock81 19:09, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Sebring12Hrs 10:00, 11 October 2025 (UTC)

File:UlicaPapierniPrądnickich-TorowiskoTramwajowe-PrądnikBiały-POL,_Kraków.jpg

• Nomination UlicaPapierniPrądnickich-TorowiskoTramwajowe-PrądnikBiały-POL, Kraków --Igor123121 05:11, 29 September 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Support Good quality. --Dev Jadiya 07:11, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose Perspective distortion should be fixed --Jakubhal 07:18, 7 October 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → More votes?   --Peulle 10:40, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

File:Outdoor_sculpture_"Owieczki",_1968_design._Bronisław_Chromy,_University_of_Agriculture_Faculty_of_Animal_Sciences,_24-28_Mickiewicza_Alley,_Kraków,_Poland.jpg

• Nomination Outdoor sculpture "Owieczki", 1968 design. Bronisław Chromy, University of Agriculture Faculty of Animal Sciences, 24-28 Mickiewicza Alley, Kraków, Poland --Igor123121 17:43, 25 September 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
• A little bit unlucky composition in the center because of a bright pants behind the sheep. --Lvova 20:32, 2 October 2025 (UTC)

  @Lvova:  Done? --Igor123121 06:23, 6 October 2025 (UTC)

•  Support Good quality. --Harmonide 00:04, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose @Harmonide: Please do not vote on top of the previous review until the dialogue is over, this is not very polite. As for me I don't think that these legs in red trousers that are still visible decorates the image, sorry. --Екатерина Борисова 02:57, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

  Well, more opinions - a good idea, because I agree with you, but not sure if my vote is oppose because of it. Lvova 09:34, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

  Sorry, Екатерина Борисова, I don't understand your point about my vote. Yesterday night was the first time I voted for Quality Images, so I did what I could based on what I understood. How should I have done it more properly? Harmonide 11:38, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

  The common sense is taking a look for a while and then the participating; you started to be very active without observation how it works, so do a little mess. As she wrote you, it's unpolite to vote when someone mentioned a problem and didn't accept a solution. Also, you use /discussions instead of /comments and put comments in CR in a little bit random place. Everything is fixable, but can be better if to be a little bit more attentive to what others do. Lvova 14:40, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

  @Harmonide: Usually, when we see a problem in someone's photo, we write the author a comment asking to work on the problem, and we wait for the author to respond. If the author has fixed the problem, the reviewer can promote the photo (or write another comment). But until the author of the photo responds to the reviewer, you should not promote his photo. In addition, you should not support photos that have already been promoted, it makes no practical sense. -- Екатерина Борисова 23:13, 9 October 2025 (UTC)

•  Weak oppose The sculptures are well taken, but the crop at the top is quite tight. --Harlock81 19:02, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Support The red pants are not obtrusive--KaiBorgeest 22:18, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → More votes?   ----KaiBorgeest 22:18, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

File:20240514_Völklingen_Ironworks_04.jpg

• Nomination The artwork Defund the War Machine by Roadsworth on a roof in the Völklingen Ironworks --FlocciNivis 16:12, 25 September 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
• I think this tries to capture too much in one image, so neither the artwork nor the ironworks are high quality. --Tagooty 03:46, 30 September 2025 (UTC)
•  Support There's something I like in this picture even if it's not perfect. It's quite immersive, it creates an atmosphere. It says something about the place. So not a remarkable shot, but a quality one in my eyes. --Harmonide 00:22, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose As explained in my comments above. --Tagooty 03:01, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → More votes?   --Lvova 09:35, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

File:2025,_Kraków,_Kamienica_Czerwona_w_Krakowie.jpg

• Nomination 2025, Kraków, Kamienica Czerwona w Krakowie --Igor123121 15:56, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
• Needs to be straightened. --Gower 17:59, 6 October 2025 (UTC)

  @Gower:  Done :) --Igor123121 18:46, 6 October 2025 (UTC)

•  Support Good quality -- Spurzem 18:38, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Weak oppose The exposure isn't very good to my eyes, and the guy's foot is cropped in the foreground. I'm not convinced on this one. Could easily be better. -- Harmonide (talk) 12:21, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → More votes?   --Lvova 14:33, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

File:Panteón,_París,_Francia,_2022-10-29,_DD_63.jpg

• Nomination Panteón, París, Francia, 2022-10-29 (by Poco a poco) --Sebring12Hrs 17:52, 5 October 2025 (UTC)
• Decline
•  Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 21:29, 5 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose Not sharp, sorry. In addition, if it is impossible to avoid people getting into the frame near popular buildings, then at least they should look natural, and here many people are distorted. --Екатерина Борисова 03:14, 6 October 2025 (UTC)

  @Екатерина Борисова: You're right, but in some cases it's best to get used to that distortion and accept that it's inevitable. The building is perfect and the position of the sun is amazing. I am also surprised by the position of the sun and the brightness and clarity of the building.--Lmbuga 13:01, 6 October 2025 (UTC)

  @Lmbuga: I'm not suggesting deleting this photo from the Commons. If a photo doesn't get a QI status, it doesn't disappear anywhere, it just doesn't get a QI status. You can use it and even consider it beautiful :) But I think it's very unsharp, especially in the shadows, and that's the main point why it's not a QI in my eyes. -- Екатерина Борисова 03:53, 7 October 2025 (UTC)

  I see some noise in darker areas, but I definitely don't agree with the stamentent that "it's very unsharp", specially if you consider that I'm offering 48 MPx of resolution. --Poco a poco 06:28, 7 October 2025 (UTC)

•  Oppose I saw so many pictures of the same building that were so much better. It's not a complimentary picture to my eyes. -- Harmonide 12:12, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose I don't think this perspective warp works here, especially with all those leaning people.--Peulle 07:37, 9 October 2025 (UTC)

Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Sebring12Hrs 09:59, 11 October 2025 (UTC)

File:The_Coin_Harvey_House.jpg

• Nomination The Harvey House, also known as the "Coin" Harvey House, is a historic home located at Huntington, Cabell County, West Virginia. It was built in 1874 and is a two-story dwelling reminiscent of houses in New Orleans. It features stained glass windows, a cast-iron mantel, and a beamed ceiling in the dining room. It is most notable as the home of William Hope "Coin" Harvey (1851 – 1936).I, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license: --Fdy3k 20:38, 4 October 2025 (UTC)
• Decline
• Too noisy as it is. Probably can be improved. --Plozessor 03:02, 5 October 2025 (UTC)

  Thanks. I applied denoise in a new version. --Fdy3k 13:18, 5 October 2025 (UTC)

  I meant to use the “comment” category instead of “discuss”. --Fdy3k 18:24, 5 October 2025 (UTC)

•  Oppose Sorry. I'm sorry, but I can't tell what the anomaly is at the top edge of the building or on the bird's head there (posterisation?). The top part has too much noise, enough to make the detail somewhat poor. The perspective needs to be corrected. Green CAs are clearly visible in the lower area, especially at the edge with the floor tiles from outside the property. --Lmbuga 00:13, 6 October 2025 (UTC)

  I take back what I said about needing perspective correction, although the tilt on the left side could be improved, but it's very minor, very insignificant. --Lmbuga 00:47, 6 October 2025 (UTC)

  Thank you. I make edits to address CA. --Fdy3k 00:17, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

•  Oppose Why did you reduce exposure? IMO it's clearly too dark now. Plus, there' still a lot of noise especially in the upper part and in the dark areas (check the "1874" sign near the top). --Plozessor 03:44, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Weak oppose Tilted and too dark for me. That's a pity. -- Harmonide 12:09, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
• I undid the exposure change, adjusted the denoise, and slightly tilted the alignment. Thanks for the feedback. --Fdy3k 22:27, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Sebring12Hrs 09:58, 11 October 2025 (UTC)

File:2024_Dom_czeladny_w_Podtyniu_(5).jpg

• Nomination Servants' house in Podtynie 3 by User:Jacek Halicki --Boston9
• Discussion
   Oppose The main object isn't focused, the sky is too bright. --Lvova 20:38, 2 October 2025 (UTC)
  I disagree, please discussion --Jacek Halicki 10:47, 3 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Neutral The photo is sharp enough, but the sky and the roof of the outbuilding are too bright. I also would have placed the main subject deeper into the frame. All in all, the photo isn't bad, but in my opinion, it's not one that deserves to be recognized as a quality image. -- Spurzem 09:32, 5 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Support Not so bad to me. --Sebring12Hrs 00:38, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Support When I first reviewed it, I was about to promote it. I didn't do so because I was convinced that it was going to be a controversial promotion. It doesn't look burnt to me. The detail and everything else is good. I don't think it's very pretty, but QI pictures don't have to be pretty.--Lmbuga 00:58, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose Sky is burnt out, same for small parts of the metal roof. The (more or less) dark building in front of the bright white sky just isn't looking good. --Plozessor 03:48, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Support Bright sky but not overexposed IMHO, overall just over the bar, I believe --Poco a poco 22:12, 10 October 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Promote?   --Plozessor 03:48, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

File:Norderney,_Strand,_Sonnenuntergang_--_2025_--_9241.jpg

• Nomination Sunset on the beach, Norderney, Lower Saxony, Germany --XRay 04:21, 1 October 2025 (UTC)
• Promotion
•  Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 04:38, 1 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose Competent image but this sunset image hasl insufficient value per QI guidelines to merit rating. --GRDN711 05:11, 1 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Weak support I would have preferred a greater DoF, but I still consider this photo QI. This is not a matter of anyone’s questionable and highly subjective judgment of whether the photo has value or not --Jakubhal 05:30, 1 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Comment It is a mystery to me how the value of a photo can be measured (also in relation to the QI guidelines). Until now, I have always rated photos based on their quality. --XRay 06:45, 1 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Comment QI is purely about the technical quality of images, not about their value. --Plozessor 08:12, 2 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Weak support per Jakubhal. --Smial 10:24, 3 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Comment @Smial: @Jakubhal: @Uoaei1: @XRay: @Plozessor: Reading through the seven QI evaluation guidelines above, some list requirements for documentation; others about aspects of technical quality and then there is the final 7th.
  

“Value

Our main goal is to encourage quality images being contributed to Wikicommons, valuable for Wikimedia and other projects.”

When I look at this image, I see a pile of (?) on a beach in front of a palid sunset. I personally think the pile is bull kelp (nereocystis luetkeana) but it is not identified as such. The beach could be anywhere (no distinction), as is the pale sunset.

Some of the QI quality attributes have characteristics that can be accurately described, But when it comes to the QI guidelines, none are measured. There is an element of subjectivity in every evaluation that works out in the consensus judgment of the reviewers.

Guideline 7 on QI Value affirms that on achieveing a QI rating, this image should the potential to be useful in the Wikipedia online encyclopedia and its derivatives. In most nominated images, the QI value is inherent in the image or from the description. IMO, as a personal picture, this image is fine, but per Guideline 7 how or where would this image find utility in Wikipedia? I just can’t see it. That is the basis of my oppose. --GRDN711 15:53, 5 October 2025 (UTC)

Unfortunately, I don't understand why everything is always reduced to Wikipedia. To be honest, I find it frustrating. There are many more Wikimedia projects and a wide range of possible applications. --XRay 05:09, 6 October 2025 (UTC)

@GRDN711: Your interpretation of the QI "value" guideline is far too narrow. Its purpose is to avoid promoting genuinely non-encyclopedic content such as random personal snapshots or selfies, not to exclude entire subjects like sunsets, wilted flowers, or beaches based on personal notions of significance. QI focuses primarily on technical quality, and your approach takes the value criterion to an extreme not supported by the guidelines or community practice. If you continue provoking such discussions, the community may eventually seek outside help to address your case. --Jakubhal 05:11, 6 October 2025 (UTC)

@GRDN711: Since the entire QI project is dedicated to technical quality, all that you can read in the Guideline relate to the technical quality of the photos, not their content. Obviously, it's much more convenient and correct to illustrate Wiki projects with good-quality images than with bad ones, and that's exactly the point. As for the "potential to be useful" of the contents of the pictures, no one can predict what will benefit and when, and what won't, and neither can you if your real name isn't Nostradamus. That is why all your arguments about the contents of the images here in this project are absolutely incorrect. -- Екатерина Борисова 04:11, 7 October 2025 (UTC)

•  Support I don't understand your point GRDN711. This image could be used to illustrate an article about algaes in Norway... --Sebring12Hrs 19:47, 5 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Support I find it quite fine too. -- Harmonide 11:57, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Comment to All: Please take the time to read the QI guidelines above. Almost without exception, anyone can upload any image of their choice. However, when the extra step is taken to nominate that image to be rated as a quality image, there are 7 guidelines that are intended to be met through review. These QI criteria cover three areas – documentation (1, 2), technical (3 – 6) and value (7) to the Wikipedia online encyclopedia and/or its member Wikis. There is more to a QI rating than just technical.
  

This QI rating system is not run for uses that no one can predict; or for use in some school project or outside publication. The stated intention of adding a QI rating to an image to distinguish that the image has potential to be useful to the Wikis.

Everyone at this forum has an opinion, and every opinion is both valid and subjective, be it about QI documentation, technical or value. We rely on the consensus opinion of this forum to be the final arbiter (which it appears I may lose, in this case ☹).

On this image, the technical aspects are well-done. I would not expect anything less from XRay who is an accomplished photographer.

You will just have to go to sleep tonight knowing that I disagree with you that this technically well-done image of an unidentified pile on a non-descript beach at sunset has sufficient value for use within the Wiki family.

If you are going to comment back, please respond to this issue only. I’m done with the rest. --GRDN711 00:47, 9 October 2025 (UTC)

To all too: Please pay attention that the word "Wikipedia" does not occur in the guidelines. ;-) And thank you very much for considering me an accomplished photographer. But I make mistakes, and there are also a number of photos I've taken that aren't good enough for QI. I use photos for many purposes, but here in particular to show what is possible in photography. (This is limited, of course, by my knowledge, which is growing day by day.) At least this aspect is educational.
I hope everyone enjoys photography. Most of us do photography as a hobby. That means we are not driven by any commissions. This gives us the opportunity to be creative on the one hand and to approach photography projects in a relaxed manner on the other. QI is a small step toward increasing our knowledge. (Of course, opinions can vary greatly when it comes to some creatively designed photos. I am thinking of another nomination of mine—keyword ICM.) The guidelines sensibly use the word “should” rather than “must” in many places. This means, above all, that not every rule is always applicable. Have fun taking photos! Enjoy being creative! --XRay 05:15, 9 October 2025 (UTC)

Total: 5 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Sebring12Hrs 09:57, 11 October 2025 (UTC)

File:Norderney,_Promenade_--_2025_--_8958.jpg

• Nomination Photographic art based on a view of the promenade in Norderney, Lower Saxony, Germany --XRay 03:48, 30 September 2025 (UTC)
• Decline
•  Oppose Sorry, perhaps FP, but not QI IMO. --Lmbuga 12:28, 30 September 2025 (UTC)

• ICM photos also have their place in QI. The criteria should generally be met, but do not have to be. For example, sharpness cannot be used as an evaluation criterion for this type of photo. --XRay 06:47, 1 October 2025 (UTC)

•  Support ICM photography can indeed qualify as QI when executed with intention and technical control. This work demonstrates a clear artistic vision, balanced composition, and a harmonious color palette. In my view, it meets the QI criteria for its genre. Best regards, --Radomianin 09:02, 1 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Support Per Radomianin. Having tried ICM myself, I see a clear difference between my lacklustre attempts and XRay's nominations --Julesvernex2 10:11, 2 October 2025 (UTC)

• A photographer friend of mine got me excited about ICM and even gave a lecture on it. The technique is very simple, he said. My first attempts didn't look particularly great. It took time before I was able to combine the desired motif with the right camera movement. So keep experimenting, even if some of the results may be surprising. --XRay 11:04, 2 October 2025 (UTC)

•  Comment I'm sorry: there's no doubt that my knowledge is limited. I withdraw my vote and hope I don't put my foot in it again. Thank you for being there to correct me.--Lmbuga 18:15, 2 October 2025 (UTC)

• Lmbuga, I don't think you have anything to be sorry about: your argument was undoubtedly worth debating and has generated an interesting discussion! --Julesvernex2 18:29, 2 October 2025 (UTC)

•  Oppose disturbing foreground, weird composition. Unlike a few other photos in the corresponding categories, the use of this technique of alienation in this photo does not support a particular motif, a special lighting situation or anything else that would be worth highlighting. It is also not eye-catching at all from a purely graphic point of view. --Smial 18:51, 4 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose I agree that this image is not good enough to merit the QI rating. In general, it would be worthwhile for XRay to start a discussion in the QIC talk page on whether and how such images are to be evaluated. --Tagooty 09:29, 5 October 2025 (UTC)

• I won't start the discussion, as I've had it many times before. It's pointless to discuss it, and even frustrating. Basically, there are two groups – to put it simply: those who only see things through the eyes of Wikipedia and only know articles that are clearly structured. Articles such as en:Intentional camera movement are usually unknown to them. The others see Wikimedia Commons as a media archive for everyone, both within the Wikimedia world and outside it. In this case, you can often see the possibilities for using such photos. It may be that this division into two different groups is just my impression, but I have experienced it very often here. It is important to me to demonstrate the possibilities of photography. This includes photos of the type presented here. And rules from our QIC Rules can only be applied where they make sense. Photos of this type are also valuable to me in my photography courses to demonstrate possibilities. I think it's important to explore different topics in photography. And, by the way, there are Wikipedia pages with relevant photos for many of these topics. --XRay 11:49, 6 October 2025 (UTC)

•  Support Юрий Д.К. 16:40, 5 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per others.--Lmbuga 20:48, 5 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose I didn’t speak up before due to the pressure of the majority, but now it’s easier to express myself. It’s also hard for me to judge such photos by the standards of this project. Lvova 21:48, 5 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Support --LucaLindholm 20:32, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per Lvova. --Sebring12Hrs 00:39, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
•  Comment Images submitted here in QI are more of a documentary nature and are evaluated according to their technical characteristics. But this is art, and in my opinion, it defies any qualitative evaluation. I have become curious myself and would like to experiment with ICM, but QI is not a platform for discussing such exhibits. --Syntaxys 03:42, 7 October 2025 (UTC)

• To be honest, I don't find the photos to have the supposedly necessary documentary character. Perhaps you can help me with a source. The term “educational” is also meant in a broad sense. I suspect that the narrower view stems from the past. I have always understood Commons to be a media archive—as are the goals of this project. Creative works were also less common in the past. But that does not exclude them. In my opinion, they are also explicitly educational in a photographic sense. In my opinion, the entire spectrum of photography should be covered—including here at QIC. --XRay 07:53, 9 October 2025 (UTC)

•  Oppose I'm on the opposing side on this one. -- Harmonide 11:49, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 6 oppose → Declined   --Lvova 13:23, 10 October 2025 (UTC)

Timetable (day 8 after nomination)

• Fri 03 Oct → Sat 11 Oct
• Sat 04 Oct → Sun 12 Oct
• Sun 05 Oct → Mon 13 Oct
• Mon 06 Oct → Tue 14 Oct
• Tue 07 Oct → Wed 15 Oct
• Wed 08 Oct → Thu 16 Oct
• Thu 09 Oct → Fri 17 Oct
• Fri 10 Oct → Sat 18 Oct
• Sat 11 Oct → Sun 19 Oct