Commons:Featured picture candidates
Other featured candidates
📽️ Media
Featured picture candidates ![]() Featured picture candidates are images that the community will vote on, to determine whether or not they will be highlighted as some of the finest on Commons. This page lists the candidates to become featured pictures. The picture of the day images are selected from featured pictures. Old candidates for Featured pictures are listed here. There are also chronological lists of featured pictures: 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024, 2025 and current month. For another overview of our finest pictures, take a look at our annual picture of the year election. |
|||||||||||||||||||
Formal thingsNominatingGuidelines for nominatorsPlease read the complete guidelines before nominating. This is a summary of what to look for when submitting and reviewing FP candidates:
Artworks, illustrations, and historical documentsThere are many different types of non-photographic media, including engravings, watercolors, paintings, etchings, and various others. Hence, it is difficult to set hard-and-fast guidelines. However, generally speaking, works can be divided into three types: Those that can be scanned, those that must be photographed, and those specifically created to illustrate a subject. Works that must be photographed include most paintings, sculptures, works too delicate or too unique to allow them to be put on a scanner, and so on. For these, the requirements for photography, below, may be mostly followed; however, it should be noted that photographs which cut off part of the original painting are generally not considered featurable. Works that may be scanned include most works created by processes that allow for mass distribution − for instance, illustrations published with novels. For these, it is generally accepted that a certain amount of extra manipulation is permissible to remove flaws inherent to one copy of the work, since the particular copy – of which hundreds, or even thousands of copies also exist – is not so important as the work itself. Works created to serve a purpose include diagrams, scientific illustrations, and demonstrations of contemporary artistic styles. For these, the main requirement is that they serve their purpose well. Provided the reproduction is of high quality, an artwork generally only needs one of the following four things to be featurable:
Digital restorations must also be well documented. An unedited version of the image should be uploaded locally, when possible, and cross-linked from the file description page. Edit notes should be specified in detail, such as "Rotated and cropped. Dirt, scratches, and stains removed. Histogram adjusted and colors balanced." PhotographsOn the technical side, we have focus, exposure, composition, movement control and depth of field.
On the graphic elements we have shape, volume, color, texture, perspective, balance, proportion, noise, etc.
You will maximise the chances of your nominations succeeding if you read the complete guidelines before nominating. Video and audioPlease nominate videos, sounds, music, etc. at Commons:Featured media candidates. Set nominationsIf a group of images are thematically connected in a direct and obvious way, they can be nominated together as a set. A set should fall under one of the following types:
Adding a new nominationIf you believe that you have found or created an image that could be considered valuable, with appropriate name, quality, image description, categories and licensing, then do the following. Step 1: copy the image name into this box, after the text already present in the box, for example, Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Your image filename.jpg. Then click on the "create new nomination" button. All single files: For renominations, simply add /2 after the filename. For example, Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Foo.jpg/2
All set nomination pages should begin "Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/", e.g. "Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/My Nomination".
Step 3: manually insert a link to the created page at the top of Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list: Click here, and add the following line to the TOP of the nominations list:
Galleries and FP categories: Please add a gallery page and section heading from the list at Commons FP galleries. Write the code as Page name#Section heading. For example: Optional: if you are not the creator of the image, please notify them using Note: Do not add an 'Alternative' image when you create a nomination. Selecting the best image is part of the nomination process. Alternatives are for a different crop or post-processing of the original image, or a closely related image from the same photo session (limited to 1 per nomination), if they are suggested by voters. VotingEditors whose accounts have at least 10 days and 50 edits can vote. Everybody can vote for their own nominations. Anonymous (IP) votes are not allowed. You may use the following templates:
You may indicate that the image has no chance of success with the template {{FPX|reason - ~~~~}}, where reason explains why the image is clearly unacceptable as a FP. The template can only be used when there are no support votes other than the one from the nominator. A well-written review helps participants (photographers, nominators and reviewers) improve their skills by providing insight into the strengths and weaknesses of a picture. Explain your reasoning, especially when opposing a candidate (which has been carefully selected by the author/nominator). English is the most widely understood language on Commons, but any language may be used in your review. A helpful review will often reference one or more of the criteria listed above. Unhelpful reasons for opposing include:
Remember also to put your signature (~~~~). Featured picture delisting candidatesOver time, featured picture standards change. It may be decided that for some pictures which were formerly "good enough", this is no longer the case. This is for listing an image which you believe no longer deserves to be a featured picture. For these, vote:
This can also be used for cases in which a previous version of an image was promoted to FP, but a newer version of the image has been made and is believed to be superior to the old version, e.g. a newly edited version of a photo or a new scan of a historical image. In particular, it is not intended for replacing older photos of a particular subject with newer photos of the same subject, or in any other case where the current FP and the proposed replacement are essentially different images. For these nominations, vote:
If you believe that some picture no longer meets the criteria for FP, you can nominate it for delisting, copying the image name into this box, after the text already present in the box: In the new delisting nomination page just created you should include:
After that, you have to manually insert a link to the created page at the top of Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list. As a courtesy, leave an informative note on the talk page(s) of the original creator, uploader(s), and nominator with a link to the delisting candidate. {{subst:FPC-notice-removal}} can be used for this purpose. Featured picture candidate policyGeneral rules
Featuring and delisting rulesA candidate will become a featured picture in compliance with following conditions:
The delisting rules are the same as those for FPs, with voting taking place over the same time period. The rule of the 5th day is applied to delisting candidates that have received no votes to delist, other than that of the proposer, by day 5. The FPCBot handles the vote counting and closing in most cases, current exceptions are candidates containing multiple versions of the image as well as FPXed and withdrawn nominations. Any experienced user may close the requests not handled by the bot. For instructions on how to close nominations, see Commons:Featured picture candidates/What to do after voting is finished. Also note that there is a manual review stage between when the bot has counted the votes and before the nomination is finally closed by the bot; this manual review can be done by any user familiar with the voting rules. Above all, be politePlease don't forget that the image you are judging is somebody's work. Avoid using phrases like "it looks terrible" and "I hate it". If you must oppose, please do so with consideration. Also remember that your command of English might not be the same as someone else's. Choose your words with care. Happy judging… and remember… all rules can be broken. See also
|
Table of contents
Featured picture candidates
Voting period ends on 20 Oct 2025 at 09:46:49 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Palaces#Italy
Info Great photo of the Pantheon in Rome, with some unique features, like the light blue of cloudy sky opposing the orange of the palaces around, quite no human being around due to the beginning of the COVID pandemic, the obelisk in front of it... fascinating. It is already a FP picture on the hebrew wikipedia and it is used already in many pages across all the wikis. /// Created by Mustafagunes2 (?) – uploaded by Mustafagunes2 – nominated by LucaLindholm -- LucaLindholm (talk) 09:46, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
Support -- LucaLindholm (talk) 09:46, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 20 Oct 2025 at 05:20:25 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Food and drink#Fruits (raw)
Info created by Petro Stelte – uploaded by Petro Stelte – nominated by Petro Stelte -- Petro Stelte (talk) 05:20, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
Support I don't think you've ever seen a picture with this composition before. -- Petro Stelte (talk) 05:20, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 20 Oct 2025 at 04:59:41 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#Germany
Info Doberan Minster in the warm light of the golden hour with reflection, highlighting the architectural significance of the monument. Would this image be more appropriate in the gallery
…/Natural phenomena#Reflections
? I would be grateful for any feedback. Created, uploaded & nominated by -- Radomianin (talk) 04:59, 11 October 2025 (UTC)Support A personal fondness for this image stems from its capture of the building with strong reflection and golden-hour light. Radomianin (talk) 04:59, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
Support very nice mood. --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 05:13, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 06:12, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
Support —Bruce1eetalk 07:34, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
Support It's beautiful, and I think it's in the right category. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:14, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 20 Oct 2025 at 04:56:34 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#Switzerland
Info Reformed earth church in Scuol. Heritage status class A protected monument Switzerland.
All by -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:56, 11 October 2025 (UTC)Support -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:56, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
Support beautiful composition. I personally love (and prefer) this other image of the church by you more, even if the current nom captures the church's seemingly precarious cliff location better. UnpetitproleX (Talk) 05:12, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
Support Looks almost like a painting - calm composition and lovely mood, even if the light is a bit pale. I agree with UnpetitproleX, the other photo is even stronger. -- Radomianin (talk) 05:21, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
Support Looks a bit too warm for me but overall nice combo and subject Poco a poco (talk) 06:12, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
Support Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:16, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
Scorpaenopsis oxycephala
Voting period ends on 19 Oct 2025 at 20:59:20 (UTC)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page
-
Front view
-
Lateral view
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Fish#Family_:_Scorpaenidae_(Scorpionfish)
Info Tasseled scorpionfish (Scorpaenopsis oxycephala), Ad Dimaniyat Islands, Oman. This species of venomous marine ray-finned fish has a wide Indo-Pacific distribution which extends from the Red Sea south to Sodwana Bay in South Africa and through the Indian Ocean and Persian Gulf east to New Guinea, south to Australia and north to Taiwan. It attains a maximum published total length of 36 centimetres (14 in), the largest species in the genus Scorpaenopsis. Note: surprisingly these could be the first FPs of a scorpion fish. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 20:59, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 20:59, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:03, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 08:37, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 19 Oct 2025 at 20:56:50 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Objects/Sculptures#Monuments and memorials
Info The July Column is a monumental column erected in the Place de la Bastille in Paris to commemorate the July Revolution of 1830. Difficult to photograph due to its enormous size, I preferred to merge six photos vertically. Created, uploaded, nominated by Terragio67 -- Terragio67 (talk) 20:56, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 20:56, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Very decent quality image, but for such a famous / banal monument, the shadows are too prominent, in my opinion. Compare with other photos in the same Category:Colonne de Juillet -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:58, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 08:38, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
- Not a banal monument to me, but otherwise,
Oppose per Basile. I'd like more light on the base and in the shadowy area near the top of the column. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:20, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 19 Oct 2025 at 19:46:31 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Serbia
Info Greenhouse in Jevremovac Botanical Garden, Belgrade, Serbia. My shot. -- Mile (talk) 19:46, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Mile (talk) 19:46, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
Support unusual POV but definitely works for me. --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 05:15, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 19 Oct 2025 at 16:01:14 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Russia#Northwestern Federal District
Info We are very unlikely to get too many good quality photos from Franz Josef Land, an isolated and uninhabited archipelago in the Arctic Circle. This one seems high quality and is a good illustration of a geological phenomenon. created by Nixette – uploaded by Nixette – nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 16:01, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 16:01, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 16:18, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
Support Rare, well-composed and very atmospheric capture. -- Radomianin (talk) 16:49, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 18:40, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 19:51, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
Support --Terragio67 (talk) 21:01, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
Comment Beautiful, but there are lots of dust spots to clean in the sky. I'd have to oppose if they are not edited out. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:07, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
- Ikan Kekek, you may need to clear your cache to get the new version to load, but they're gone now. Sorry to Nixette for editing your image but seeing you have not been active on Commons since September 2024 it's unlikely to see this before the nomination closes. If you would prefer to make any changes yourself please feel free to revert my version. Cmao20 (talk) 23:23, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
Support I did have to clear my cache. Great job! -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:28, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
- Ikan Kekek, you may need to clear your cache to get the new version to load, but they're gone now. Sorry to Nixette for editing your image but seeing you have not been active on Commons since September 2024 it's unlikely to see this before the nomination closes. If you would prefer to make any changes yourself please feel free to revert my version. Cmao20 (talk) 23:23, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
Support Some info on the photographer. JayCubby (talk) 03:40, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:20, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
Support Poco a poco (talk) 06:06, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 19 Oct 2025 at 16:01:13 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors#Czech_Republic
Info I will concede that there is some noise and corner unsharpness but nevertheless do bear in mind this picture is large in size (24 megapixels). It also appears, from a Google search, that photography is normally not permitted in this room, certainly not with a tripod, and that the picture has been taken with special permission. Therefore I consider this a majestic and effective illustration of this beautiful space. created by Skot – uploaded by Skot – nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 16:01, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 16:01, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 16:19, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
Support Perfectly balanced, richly detailed, in sublime light. -- Radomianin (talk) 16:53, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
Support Wow, I can't stop panning through this image at 100% zoom, it's chock full of detail. Brainandforce (talk) 18:03, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
Support per above. --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 18:40, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
Support Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 19:48, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 19:52, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
Support --Terragio67 (talk) 21:02, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
Support Poco a poco (talk) 21:26, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
Support Beautiful and very well photographed. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:11, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:19, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 19 Oct 2025 at 14:27:50 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Settlements#India
Info created by and originally uploaded by Biswarup Ganguly – edited and nominated by UnpetitproleX (Talk) 14:27, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
Support -- UnpetitproleX (Talk) 14:27, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
Support per comments on my talk page, I find this a satisfying composition that conveys a sense of the majesty of the valley Cmao20 (talk) 16:07, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
Weak oppose Dull light. Maybe another angle of view, or another time of the day would have worked better -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:01, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
- I'm sorry but I'm not seeing the dull light; this was taken on 10:30 am during a seemingly clear, sunny day and no part of the image is under shadow either... UnpetitproleX (Talk) 02:23, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
- I think it may have been the editing, so I have increased brightness slightly. UnpetitproleX (Talk) 02:45, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
Support Perhaps the photo could use a little more contrast in the rocky areas.--Famberhorst (talk) 05:15, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
Oppose The most interesting element in the compo, the mountains, are hidden/too small. The area in the foreground and the cropped river are uninteresting Poco a poco (talk) 06:05, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
- The river isn't uninteresting to me, and I could have stood to see more of it, but otherwise,
Oppose per Poco. There's just too much of the photo that isn't special to me. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:23, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 19 Oct 2025 at 11:00:59 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Russia#North Caucasian Federal District
Info Greater Caucasus Range between the Dombay-Ulgen and Amanauz valleys. The peaks and glaciers of Dzhuguturlyuchat, Amanauz, Sofrudzhu, and Belalakaya. All by -- Argenberg (talk) 11:00, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
Support There is an FP candidate currently running which focuses solely on the Dzhuguturlyuchat massif, but this one presents a panoramic view of a distinctive bend in the Greater Caucasus Range with many peaks and glaciers in the Dombay-Ulgen and Amanauz realms. This 8-10 km stretch of the range is remarkable for its average prominence of over 2 km, reaching up to 2.2 km in places. -- Argenberg (talk) 11:00, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
Support Excellent quality and good composition, nice illustration of these mountains Cmao20 (talk) 16:06, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:14, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
Weak oppose Great mountain, but as a FP it's too hazy, in my view. The light is dull, and the colors blueish. Perhaps another angle of view would make this image more special -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:06, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
Weak oppose Agree Poco a poco (talk) 06:11, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 19 Oct 2025 at 11:02:16 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/People#Standing_people
Info Taken in Temple Premises. Young priests under the age of 16 perform daily rituals, including cleaning and worshiping the reclining Vishnu statue, at the en:Budhanilkantha Temple in Nepal. All by Me User:Bijay Chaurasia– nominated by Bijay Chaurasia -- Bijay Chaurasia (talk) 11:02, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Bijay Chaurasia (talk) 11:02, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
Support Nice mood. --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 12:02, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
Support Nice composition and colours Cmao20 (talk) 16:03, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
Support Intimate, serene, and beautifully colored capture. -- Radomianin (talk) 17:08, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
Support the young pundit is twinning with the temple's colours. :) --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 18:37, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
Support Ermell (talk) 19:53, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
Support --Terragio67 (talk) 21:03, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
Support Nice portrait. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:16, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:06, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
Weak support Nice combo but you should have tried to avoid a centered compo. The kid should be rather on the right with more lead room Poco a poco (talk) 06:10, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
Support --Berthold Werner (talk) 07:15, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
Comment I agree with Poco. A crop on the right would improve it. --Yann (talk) 08:41, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 19 Oct 2025 at 10:23:54 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#North Macedonia
Info All by me. -- Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 10:23, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 10:23, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
Weak oppose Nice, interesting subject and good quality but sorry, the strong shadows make the composition look somewhat messy for me Cmao20 (talk) 16:03, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
Support I really like these shadows. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:20, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Decent composition but ordinary shot of an unspectacular monument, in my view -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:08, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 19 Oct 2025 at 08:38:33 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Reptiles#Family_:_Varanidae_(Monitor_Lizards_and_Komodo_dragon)
Info Close-up of a Komodo dragon with its mouth open. All by me -- Jakubhal 08:38, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Jakubhal 08:38, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 10:22, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
Support --Bijay Chaurasia (talk) 10:46, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
Support Cmao20 (talk) 11:01, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
Support I suppose this is the same dragon that appeared last time. Wolverine X-eye 16:04, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
- Same day, but different dragon. Spotted a bit earlier. -- Jakubhal 19:01, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
Support --imehling (talk) 18:27, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
Support Ermell (talk) 19:55, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
Support --Terragio67 (talk) 21:04, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
Support Great! -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:22, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:05, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
Weak support I find the right crop too tight but yes, this one is a good wildlife shot Poco a poco (talk) 06:09, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 19 Oct 2025 at 06:01:54 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious_buildings#India
Info created by Saikat Surai – uploaded by Saikat Surai – nominated by Sumitsurai -- Sumit Surai (talk) 06:01, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Sumit Surai (talk) 06:01, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Image quality is good but sorry, the huge shadows and the cropped courtyard at the top don't work for me. Cmao20 (talk) 10:55, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Not convinced by the light and heavy distorsions produced by this wide angle lens, sorry -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:11, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 18 Oct 2025 at 22:29:25 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family_:_Psittacidae_(True_Parrots)
Info created by Giles Laurent – uploaded by Giles Laurent – nominated by Giles Laurent -- Giles Laurent (talk) 22:29, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 22:29, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
Support Nice. Is there any way to tell which ones are the male and the female? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:37, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you! Hyacinth macaws are visually indistinguishable between males and females so the only way to differenciate them is by behavior (reproduction, laying eggs, etc) or DNA. But these birds are monogamous and typically mate for life and it's sure that these two are a couple -- Giles Laurent (talk) 06:43, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
- I don't doubt that they're a couple. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:24, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you! Hyacinth macaws are visually indistinguishable between males and females so the only way to differenciate them is by behavior (reproduction, laying eggs, etc) or DNA. But these birds are monogamous and typically mate for life and it's sure that these two are a couple -- Giles Laurent (talk) 06:43, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
Support DoF handled quite well. JayCubby (talk) 23:57, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 00:15, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
Support -- -donald- (talk) 06:05, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
Support Beautiful colour composition. – Aristeas (talk) 09:04, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 09:14, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
Support Vibrant birds under pink blossoms, highlighting color contrast and creating an elegant composition. -- Radomianin (talk) 10:17, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 10:23, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
Support Wonderful colours, what a lovely sight and superb quality + detail Cmao20 (talk) 10:54, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
Support per Cmao20, word by word!! -- Je-str (talk) 15:01, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
Support Good, vibrant background. Wolverine X-eye 16:05, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
Support Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 19:49, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
Support Ermell (talk) 19:56, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
Support --Terragio67 (talk) 21:05, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
Support Paradise :-) Lovely background and the birds are awesome at full resolution -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:12, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:04, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
Support Poco a poco (talk) 06:07, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 18 Oct 2025 at 19:12:15 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Serbia
Info created, uploaded & nominated by kallerna —kallerna (talk) 19:12, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
Support Genex Tower in Belgrade, Serbia, an iconic example of Yugoslav brutalism, framed with abandoned car park to reflect the tension between past ambition and present decline —kallerna (talk) 19:12, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
Strong support I love the composition and the juxtaposition. This is more than just a well-shot picture. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:17, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
Support I like the story it tells. --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 21:45, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
Support Per Ikan Kekek and UnpetitproleX, what a composition! One thing though: the lower tower balconies are level but the upper ones lean to the right. Should be a matter of adjusting the perspective correction control points? --Julesvernex2 (talk) 07:45, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
Support per Ikan and UnpetitproleX. – Aristeas (talk) 09:02, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
Support Brutalist architecture, emphasizing its form and striking urban presence. -- Radomianin (talk) 10:11, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 10:25, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
Support per Ikan Kekek. This is indeed a remarkable photo Cmao20 (talk) 10:53, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
Support Terragio67 (talk) 21:28, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 18 Oct 2025 at 18:36:03 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Charadriiformes#Genus_:_Vanellus
Info Crowned lapwing (Vanellus coronatus), Amboseli National Park, Kenya. It occurs contiguously from the Red Sea coast of Somalia to southern and southwestern Africa. It is an adaptable and numerous species, with bold and noisy habits. Their diet consists of a variety of insects, but termites and ants form an important component and can live up to 20 years. Note: there is no FP of commons of this species. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 18:36, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 18:36, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
Comment Good-looking bird, very well shot and well composed. Is there green CA at the margins of the rocks on the right side, or is that just grass? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:19, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
- Ikan Kekek:
Fixed, Poco a poco (talk) 21:52, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
- I still see the CA. Did you possibly upload the wrong file? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:35, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
Support Sorry, I needed to clear my cache. There's still some kind of border on some of the rocks, but that's OK. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:31, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
- I still see the CA. Did you possibly upload the wrong file? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:35, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
- Ikan Kekek:
Comment There is now a halo around the bird (masking?). This version has much more feather detail. I think the first version of the file, (which doesn't have the lost detail and colored artifacts) is superior. JayCubby (talk) 00:01, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
- I am not really on the same page about your comments on the feather detail, JayCubby, but I uploaded a more balanced version based on the first version (removing also the CA). Poco a poco (talk) 07:57, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 10:25, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
Support Excellent for me, really good detail on the feathers and nice composition Cmao20 (talk) 10:52, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 14:05, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 20:32, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 18 Oct 2025 at 07:56:08 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#Tunisia
Info created by Skander zarrad – uploaded by Skander zarrad – nominated by Ovva olfa -- Ovva olfa (talk) 07:56, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Ovva olfa (talk) 07:56, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
Comment does this need a perspective correction? Cmao20 (talk) 12:21, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
- No, this photo doesn’t need a perspective correction. The vertical and horizontal lines of the mosque and surrounding ruins look natural and consistent with the terrain’s slope and the photographer’s shooting angle. The slightly upward viewpoint enhances the sense of depth and emphasizes the height of the tower without creating noticeable distortion. The image maintains a balanced and authentic composition that reflects the character of the historical site. Olfa Yakoubi -ألفة يعقوبي (talk) 08:41, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
Support There are almost no vertical lines in this picture anyway. Description could be better, but else it looks ok to me. --imehling (talk) 18:22, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 18 Oct 2025 at 04:36:59 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors/Germany#North_Rhine-Westphalia
Info created and uploaded and nominated by XRay -- XRay 💬 04:36, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
Info Perhaps a word about how this photo came about. The special ammunition depot can only be visited as part of a guided tour or a photography workshop. Electricity is only available in a few places, so most of the depot is dark at night. To be able to take photos anyway, you need twilight, moonlight, or mobile artificial light. For this shot, a mobile light was placed in the tower to highlight it. To ensure that the structures around the tower were also sufficiently visible, the surroundings and, in particular, the tower were illuminated with a flashlight during the 30-second exposure time. --XRay 💬 04:36, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
Support -- XRay 💬 04:36, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
Comment Interesting idea, but although I respect the technical accomplishment and think the result is a good quality photo, I'm not sure I see an outstanding composition here. Cmao20 (talk) 12:20, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
Oppose There's nothing about this image that makes me go "wow". Maybe I'm missing the point of this compo. Wolverine X-eye 16:29, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
Support. I found a slight brightening to be an improvement (bump up exposure + shadows, reduce whites). JayCubby (talk) 00:06, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
Support Not exactly beautiful but certainly interesting. --imehling (talk) 18:30, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Too dark in my view. Hard to distinguish. -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:16, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
- It's night. --XRay 💬 03:34, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
- It looks like dusk, like here -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:47, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 17 Oct 2025 at 23:06:27 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera/Hesperiidae#Genus : Atalopedes
Info Female Huron sachem (Atalopedes huron). On the small side, but it's a small butterfly and IMO the detail/comp merits FP nom. all by — Rhododendrites talk | 23:06, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
Support — Rhododendrites talk | 23:06, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
Support per nom. Pretty and impressive to me. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:07, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
Support as per nom and Ikan. -- Radomianin (talk) 05:44, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 06:46, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 07:01, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
Support --Ovva olfa (talk) 07:58, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:09, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
Support--Bijay Chaurasia (talk) 10:44, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
Support Well composed Cmao20 (talk) 12:19, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 15:19, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
Support Great capture! Wolverine X-eye 16:30, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
Support Great colours.--Micha (talk) 19:33, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
Support Beautiful -- Giles Laurent (talk) 22:37, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
Support – Aristeas (talk) 09:00, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
Support Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 19:50, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
Support Ermell (talk) 20:35, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
Support Terragio67 (talk) 21:27, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 17 Oct 2025 at 23:03:32 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family_:_Parulidae_(New_World_Warblers)
Info Pine warbler (Setophaga pinus). all by — Rhododendrites talk | 23:03, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
Support — Rhododendrites talk | 23:03, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
Support Excellent. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:08, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
Support Great Pose, well lit and tack sharp. --Needsmoreritalin (talk) 02:53, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
Support as per Needsmoreritalin. -- Radomianin (talk) 05:01, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 06:45, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 06:46, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 07:01, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
Support --Ovva olfa (talk) 07:58, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
Support I didnt know you are on OM-1 now. Good colors, can we say better than Em-5 ? Nice motion capture of bird. There might be some editing mistake on right side of legs. --Mile (talk) 08:17, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks. My E-M5ii had been falling apart, then the on/off switched stopped working (had to take the battery out to turn it off), then they stopped making batteries for it (and third party batteries are terrible), so it was time -- found a good used deal on an OM-1. It has a few neat features that my old one didn't (focus stacking, for example), but I rarely actually use them. It might have a bit better image quality, but I haven't noticed a huge difference. I like the feel/shape of the camera better, and appreciate that additional 4MP. Thanks for highlighting the mistake. Don't know how that happened, but I will fix when I get back to my desktop (traveling until Monday). — Rhododendrites talk | 15:47, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:08, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
Support--Bijay Chaurasia (talk) 10:44, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
Support Cmao20 (talk) 12:19, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 15:20, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
Support That's not a perspective I see often. Good shot! Wolverine X-eye 16:32, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
Support-- E.IMANCOMMONS 21:16, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 22:37, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
Support per Needsmoreritalin. – Aristeas (talk) 08:58, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 10:26, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
Support Ermell (talk) 20:42, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 17 Oct 2025 at 17:43:42 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Architectural elements#Windows
Info Islamic ornaments and window (Sherdor Medresa, Samarkand). My shot. -- Mile (talk) 17:43, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Mile (talk) 17:43, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
Support Cmao20 (talk) 21:46, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
Support It would be interesting to see a left margin equidistant from the window to the distance from it to the right margin, but that's not a basis to oppose this fine shot of a beautiful part of this building. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:12, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
Comment @Ikan Kekek In that case i would lose my "diagonalization" (vertex on left diagonale). --Mile (talk) 08:23, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
- Yeah, I see that, now that you mention it. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:35, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
Support Fine symmetry and excellent detail; a captivating view of the ornamentation. -- Radomianin (talk) 04:59, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 07:00, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:07, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
Support Анастасия Львоваru/en 13:05, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 15:20, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
Support but the gallery should be Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Architectural elements#Windows, imo --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 21:41, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
- Changed per suggest. Mile (talk) 01:00, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 22:37, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
Support – Aristeas (talk) 08:57, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 10:27, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:01, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 17 Oct 2025 at 15:00:10 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#India
Info created and originally uploaded by Ganesh Mohan T – edited and nominated by UnpetitproleX (Talk) 15:00, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
Support -- UnpetitproleX (Talk) 15:00, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
Comment Lovely place. Any chance to add some (estimated) geocoordinates to the image? E.g., is this here? I’m not sure … – Aristeas (talk) 19:01, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
Done @Aristeas: I looked at google earth and peakvisor imagery, and used my own personal experience being there, to make a reasonable guess. Also annotated the glacier and tagged the peaks. UnpetitproleX (Talk) 19:42, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
Support Thank you very much! – Aristeas (talk) 08:46, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 21:12, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
Support Cmao20 (talk) 21:45, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
Support Good composition, sharp and very picturesque, and I love all the people, horses and other details. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:15, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
Support Beautifully composed with clear focus, capturing both scenery and vibrant activity. -- Radomianin (talk) 05:05, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 06:59, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:06, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 15:44, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
Support Lovely snow! Wolverine X-eye 16:33, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 22:37, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:18, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 17 Oct 2025 at 13:27:27 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family_:_Cisticolidae_(Cisticolas)
Info All by -- Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 13:27, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 13:27, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
Support Every detail on the feathers can be seen. Splendid work. -- Harmonide (talk) 18:05, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
Weak oppose While this one is a QI for sure, it is quite low resolution and I don't think the composition makes up for it. For me there has to be something to an FP beyond just a sharp ID photo of a bird. Cmao20 (talk) 21:45, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
Support, the feather detail is good (resolution, I've found, is independent of the detail on feathers in particular). JayCubby (talk) 01:21, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
Support I agree, and the composition is simple and fine. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:17, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 06:58, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:04, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
Support – Aristeas (talk) 09:39, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
Support Nice posturing! Wolverine X-eye 16:35, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 22:36, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
Support Striking in its simplicity, with fine detail and a beautifully soft background. -- Radomianin (talk) 10:53, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
Support Per anderen.--Famberhorst (talk) 05:00, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 17 Oct 2025 at 08:16:39 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Fungi#Family_:_Psathyrellaceae
Info created, uploaded, nominated by George Chernilevsky -- George Chernilevsky talk 08:16, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
Info These mushrooms become light and faded in dry weather, but after rain they become a rich color.
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 08:16, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
Support Pretty mushrooms per nom, good composition and nice details. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:28, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
Support Expressive image with fine light and beautiful texture of the mushroom. -- Radomianin (talk) 04:52, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 06:57, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:03, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
Support-- E.IMANCOMMONS 21:17, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 22:36, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:18, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 17 Oct 2025 at 04:27:02 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Natural/Switzerland#Grisons_(Graubünden)
Info Panixersee (Lag da Pigniu) above Andiast. Rock face above the reservoir. Impressive rock face above the reservoir.
All by -- Famberhorst (talk) 04:27, 8 October 2025 (UTC)Support -- Famberhorst (talk) 04:27, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
Support the WB is a bit too warm (the clouds and snow appear yellow-ish), but this may be an artistic choice. I would prefer slightly less warm, but very beautiful regardless. --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 05:22, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
Done. Small correction, WB. Thanks for your comments and support.--Famberhorst (talk) 06:26, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
Support--Bijay Chaurasia (talk) 08:18, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 08:31, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
Support Beautiful reflection. Wolverine X-eye 12:11, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
Support Admirable. -- Harmonide (talk) 17:32, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
Support --imehling (talk) 20:00, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
Support Ermell (talk) 21:15, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
Support Peaceful and high quality Cmao20 (talk) 21:27, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
Support Wonderful serenity and balance, the mirrored rock face creates a calm scene. -- Radomianin (talk) 04:55, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 06:57, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
Support--Olfa Yakoubi -ألفة يعقوبي (talk) 08:00, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
Support per Radomianin. – Aristeas (talk) 09:37, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
Support per others. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:22, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 22:36, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 10:28, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 16 Oct 2025 at 19:27:49 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery:Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Sculptures#Sculptures indoors
Info created by A S M Jobaer – uploaded by A S M Jobaer – nominated by A S M Jobaer -- A S M Jobaer (talk) 19:27, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
Support -- A S M Jobaer (talk) 19:27, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
Comment What is real here? the vignetting and the curves (exposure) / blurriness of the background is obviously the result of editing (although no hint about significant manipulation is stated), not sure about that ray of light. Sorry to say but this image, with this level of editing shouldn't have got the QI stamp. Poco a poco (talk) 20:10, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
- A S M Jobaer: can you please provide some feedback about your nom and the questions/doubts above? Poco a poco (talk) 17:59, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
Comment Really bad file name. Poetic names may be nice for your Flickr or Instagram page, but it's in clear violation of the Commons naming policy since it has no info about what's in the photos. --Cart (talk) 20:15, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
Comment Location information by description and/or GPS coordinates would also be helpful. --GRDN711 (talk) 05:43, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
Oppose per Poco a poco. --MB-one (talk) 06:54, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Sorry but it just doesn't work for me. The composition looks oppressive and surreal, not hopeful as is intended. Cmao20 (talk) 21:26, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
Oppose per above. JayCubby (talk) 21:51, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People/Portrait#Men
Info Closeup at a Gussadi dance performer, created by Pdp79892, nominated by I.Mahesh -- iMahesh (talk) 15:57, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
Support -- iMahesh (talk) 15:57, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 16:02, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
Support Excellent, and not the most usual subject for FPC. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:16, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
Support --Berthold Werner (talk) 17:36, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 17:50, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
Support --imehling (talk) 18:34, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
Support Very expressive! -- Radomianin (talk) 21:03, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
Support Splendid and intriguing.--Harmonide (talk) 21:37, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
Support heylenny (talk/edits) 00:43, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
Support wow! --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 05:03, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
Support Good work. --GRDN711 (talk) 05:47, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 06:53, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:54, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
Support --MB-one (talk) 06:55, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 08:32, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 21:23, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
Support Cmao20 (talk) 21:24, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 06:56, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Jakubhal 07:22, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
Support--Olfa Yakoubi -ألفة يعقوبي (talk) 08:00, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
Support Thank you for the editing, I.Mahesh, it has really improved the image. – Aristeas (talk) 09:36, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you!! – iMahesh (talk) 11:05, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
Support Cool paint and awesome headwear. Wolverine X-eye 16:40, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 22:36, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:17, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 16 Oct 2025 at 08:22:26 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Towers#Germany
Info The Leuchtturm Kaiserschleuse Ost, also called Small Bell Tower or Pingelturm, on the headland between the entrance to the former "small" Kaiserschleuse and the entrance to the "large" Kaiserschleuse, was built in 1900 according to a design by harbor master Rudolf Rudloff. The round, squat tower shaft was crowned with a crenellated crown above projecting consoles. Above it rises the lantern with the beacon on top, which at night marks the starboard side of the entrance to the Kaiserschleuse with a steady green light. In foggy weather, four chimes ring in rapid succession; created by Llez – uploaded by Llez – nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 08:22, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Llez (talk) 08:22, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
Support Interesting shape! JayCubby (talk) 14:00, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
Support Crisp, pleasant photo of a nice structure. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:17, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
Support --imehling (talk) 18:32, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
Support heylenny (talk/edits) 00:44, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:31, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:52, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
Oppose technically a very good photo. But IMO for FP the background is a little too cluttered. --MB-one (talk) 06:56, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 08:32, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
Support Cmao20 (talk) 21:24, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
Support – Aristeas (talk) 09:35, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 22:35, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
Support Took a while to decide, but it works beautifully in fullscreen - clear composition and excellent detail. -- Radomianin (talk) 05:40, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 16 Oct 2025 at 07:17:27 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Accipitriformes#Genus : Circaetus
Info All by -- Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 07:17, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 07:17, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
Support Impressive shot. Wolverine X-eye 07:19, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
Comment I'm not entirely convinced yet. The image is undoubtedly very impressive, but I still wonder why the subject is presented in this image format. Either I would have placed the bird further to the right when taking the photo, or I would have cropped the image to a portrait format of 3:4 or 4:5. Unfortunately, the centred subject takes away some of the image's liveliness. --Syntaxys (talk) 12:05, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
- I tried the portrait format but did not like that much so I have tried the rule of third and uploaded a new version. Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 07:03, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 17:50, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
Weak oppose Agree with Syntaxys about the format. I don't think that this one is helping, centered subject with lots of space on left and right. Furthermore the subject is realitvely small and therefore the level of detail not the best. The blurry area at the bottom is also disturbing and even obscures a bit of the subject. Sorry, but I cannot support it Poco a poco (talk) 20:15, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
- I agree about the blurry area obscuring part of the subject, and it's the reason I haven't voted to support the nomination. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:23, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
Support I don't agree with the criticism. I find this shot mesmerizing, because of its composition. Centering the subject allowed to center its round bright eye and its pupil. The eye is placed just on the dark line where the trees take roots in the blurred background, between the first and the second third of the image. Exactly where you naturally start to read when you open a book. Everything naturally leads to that hypnotic yellow eye with its perfect geometry. This is the effect is has on me as a viewer and I wouldn't like this image to have been taken any other way. --Harmonide (talk) 11:00, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
Support Like Harmonide, I don’t share the criticism. Seeing the bird from its back would normally be a disadvantage, but here becomes an advantage because it allows to show how the snake eagle turns around its head, allowing it to observe even what is right behind its back. Yes, there is much OOF background in this photo, but only the negative space gives the shape of the bird its meaning and makes it stand out. The unsharp foreground and background elements add depth to the image. – Aristeas (talk) 11:57, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
Support for the cropped version. I agree with Syntaxys and the right crop has elevated the image. --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 13:18, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
Support There is a thin twig to the left of the bird's claw, that like dust spots, is inconsequentual and detracts. I would be inclined to make that disappear. Also, the image might benefit from a little tighter crop at top and bottom to bring the bird forward in the frame. --GRDN711 (talk) 19:15, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you, I have removed the thin twig. Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 06:56, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
Support I really like the composition and the focus on the bird's eye. The negative space and blurred background give depth and make the subject stand out beautifully. Minor distractions don't reduce the impact. -- Radomianin (talk) 19:20, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
Support The reduction to just a few colors is fascinating. Good use of blurring.--Ermell (talk) 21:21, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
Support per Ermell and Aristeas Cmao20 (talk) 21:23, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 06:55, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 22:35, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
Weak support for non-conventional cinematic look. --Argenberg (talk) 11:11, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 16 Oct 2025 at 02:03:06 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic_media/People#Portraits, paintings_of_males
Info Painting by Alexej von Jawlensky of dancer Alexander Sakharoff, photo by Lenbachhaus – uploaded by Trzęsacz – nominated by LosPajaros -- LosPajaros (talk) 02:03, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
Support -- LosPajaros (talk) 02:03, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
Comment@LosPajaros: No, it`s not created by me, but by the artist Alexej von Jawlensky in 1909.--Anne-Sophie Ofrim (talk) 08:12, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you, info updated. --Cart (talk) 16:54, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
Support Good reproduction of the artwork. --Harlock81 (talk) 17:49, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
Support per Harlock81, and especially interesting as this painting unites two pioneers of modern arts, Alexej von Jawlensky and Alexander Sakharoff. – Aristeas (talk) 08:00, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
Support per Aristeas Cmao20 (talk) 21:22, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 06:55, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:12, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:15, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 05:57, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 13:10, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
Support --Schnobby (talk) 15:44, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 05:44, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 15 Oct 2025 at 18:57:54 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/People/Work#Musicians_with_instruments
Info One of the nearby communities has a large bike rally every year, raising funds for a hospice. This year I decided to try and take my camera into the concerts, which are always a major draw. I think this is among the best of the four performances; it shows Tyler Connolly of the rock band Theory of a Deadman with one of the (numerous) electric guitars he used during the performance. (For anyone interested, the other performers were Carly Pearce, Kim Mitchell, and Mitchell Tenpenny... aside from maybe one Pearce picture, I don't think any of them would cross the FP bar.) All by Crisco 1492 -- — Chris Woodrich (talk) 18:57, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
Support -- — Chris Woodrich (talk) 18:57, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
Comment Good too. But his skin color is a bit "orange-yellow" overdose, which could be lowered. --Mile (talk) 06:54, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
- I'm not entirely sure. Stage lighting, of course, is a hassle, but the whites on the guitar seem more accurate than the cooler colours offered at File:Tyler Connolly performing with Theory of a Deadman, Hogs for Hospice, Leamington, Ontario, 2025-08-01 66.jpg. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 16:46, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
Comment @Chris Woodrich That 2nd is better. --Mile (talk) 17:39, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
- I've added it as an alt. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 18:55, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
Support We cannot expect natural skin colours with stage lighting – the lighting can give the skin all kinds of colours. For me both shots are fine. – Aristeas (talk) 07:55, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
ALT
- ALT from slightly earlier in the set.
Support as nominator. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 18:55, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
Support Seems a little sharper, and I like the facial expression more. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:19, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
Support We cannot expect natural skin colours with stage lighting – the lighting will give the skin all kinds of colours. For me both shots are fine. – Aristeas (talk) 07:55, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
Support More natural skin colors. --Mile (talk) 09:53, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
Support for me this one is slightly better of the two. --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 17:56, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
Support as per UnpetitproleX. -- Radomianin (talk) 19:24, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
Support Like both; this one a little better. --GRDN711 (talk) 19:41, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 06:54, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:13, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 15:46, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 22:35, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
Support Poco a poco (talk) 06:15, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 15 Oct 2025 at 17:23:49 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles and fortifications/Germany#Rhineland-Palatinate
Info all by imehling -- imehling (talk) 17:23, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
Support -- imehling (talk) 17:23, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 18:59, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
Comment Hi, everyone! This photo is really pleasant, and I am likely to support, but could someone remind me how to search for other QIs in this category, so I can look at any others if they exist? I don't seem to be offered the choice to do an FP or QI search on the Category:Marksburg page. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:47, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
- Hi Ikan Kekek, I agree with you - there's often a 'good pictures' button in the top right of the category page that lets one restrict a search only to QIs/FPs/VIs in a category, but in the Category:Marksburg page this button seems to be missing. (Then again, for me, it often doesn't work even when it's there...) So although there are certainly no featured pictures of this castle, I can't say for certain how many QIs there are. The best I have been able to do is to conduct a keyword search for Marksburg in the QIs category, see results here. I can see a number of other QIs that feature the castle from a distance, but it appears that this may be the only similarly close-up QI. Cmao20 (talk) 00:35, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
- @Ikan Kekek: PetScan can do that too. Here is a query of based on Category:Marksburg and the {{Quality image}} template. --MB-one (talk) 07:06, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks! File:Marksburg Braubach 2012.jpg is a nice composition. I'm going to live with this photo a little longer before likely voting. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:30, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
- I looks like it didn't keep your search terms, but thanks for the link to that page! I'll play around with it. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:47, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 00:10, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
Support Cmao20 (talk) 00:35, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 08:03, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:57, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 17:11, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
Support heylenny (talk/edits) 00:23, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
Support Though the wider 2012 picture that Ikan refers to does offer better idea of the surrounding area and context, for the structure itself this is better. --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 05:08, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
Support – Aristeas (talk) 07:53, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 22:34, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
Support Poco a poco (talk) 06:16, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 15 Oct 2025 at 15:43:02 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Astronomy#Nebulae
Info created, uploaded and nominated by SimgDe -- SimgDe (talk) 15:43, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
Support -- SimgDe (talk) 15:43, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
Support Wow! --Yann (talk) 16:28, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
Support --AFBorchert (talk) 20:30, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
Support Really beautiful! -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:49, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 00:10, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
Support Excellent, and even more so because this is your own work rather than yet another NASA shot. Cmao20 (talk) 00:15, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
Support as per Ikan and Cmao20. -- Radomianin (talk) 07:12, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
Support Amazing! Wolverine X-eye 07:18, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 08:02, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:52, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 17:44, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
Support No words for this. --Harmonide (talk) 21:40, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
Support heylenny (talk/edits) 00:22, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
Support per Cmao20. – Aristeas (talk) 07:52, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 08:33, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
Support Good image with excellent documentation and notes. It makes a difference for future use. --GRDN711 (talk) 16:35, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 22:33, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
Support Wow, I was linked the Northern Sky Narrowband Survey by a friend in the astrophotography community recently, and I am glad to see images from the survey available on Commons! If you supported this, have a look at this treasure trove of data. I hope to see many more gems from the survey nominated here. Brainandforce (talk) 18:12, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 15 Oct 2025 at 11:41:48 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Coraciiformes#Genus_:_Megaceryle
Info created by Giles Laurent – uploaded by Giles Laurent – nominated by Giles Laurent -- Giles Laurent (talk) 11:41, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 11:41, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 12:14, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 13:49, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 13:50, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
Support A shot timed to near perfection! Well done. Wolverine X-eye 16:27, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 16:29, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
Support Poco a poco (talk) 19:52, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
Support Nice catch. --AFBorchert (talk) 20:32, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
Support per others. Excellent. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:51, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 00:10, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
Strong support One cannot argue with perfection. Cmao20 (talk) 00:14, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
Support Wow! Catching a bird in flight is already a difficult challenge, but a flying bird with a fish in the beak! -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:38, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
Support I would crop a bit on all sides. Good anyway, capturing fish. --Mile (talk) 06:56, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
- No, please don't. Let's the bird fly. Yann (talk) 16:04, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
Done new sligthly croped version uploaded. After carefully comparing the two versions I do think that with a slight crop it looks better because it enhances the action happening -- Giles Laurent (talk) 05:01, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
- No, please don't. Let's the bird fly. Yann (talk) 16:04, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
Support Great capture! -- Radomianin (talk) 07:13, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 07:20, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 08:01, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
Support --Schnobby (talk) 08:26, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:51, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
Support JayCubby (talk) 15:23, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 17:08, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
Support - The shot so many try to get and fail, but you have managed to pull off! --Needsmoreritalin (talk) 20:18, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
Support --Harmonide (talk) 21:48, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 05:09, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
Support – Aristeas (talk) 07:50, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 08:34, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 20:07, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
Support — ERcheck (talk). 15:26, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 15 Oct 2025 at 10:24:15 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People/Portrait#Women
Info created by Bijay Chaurasia – uploaded by Bijay Chaurasia – nominated by Bijay Chaurasia -- Bijay Chaurasia (talk) 10:24, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Bijay Chaurasia (talk) 10:24, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 16:29, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
Comment Valuable, but doesn't feel that sharp to me. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:52, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Her face looks noticeably unsharp even at full page size without zooming in further. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:27, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
Weak oppose per Ikan. --SHB2000 (talk) 00:11, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
Support Agree with Ikan that there is some slight unsharpness. It looks more like minor motion blur than missed focus to me. But the picture is 22 megapixels so there's plenty of room to downsize, so not a deal breaker for me. Pleasant composition, nice colours, and good illustration of traditional clothing. Cmao20 (talk) 00:14, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Could be more sharp, but i dont like composition. Should be shot as buste, zoomed just face till that yellow necklace. --Mile (talk) 06:59, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
Weak oppose Quality image, interesting subject, but the result could be better and more striking. --Harmonide (talk) 21:46, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
Oppose per others. heylenny (talk/edits) 00:21, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
Support Aesthetically pleasing colour scheme --Erika Dauði (talk) 03:15, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination -Bijay Chaurasia (talk) 10:56, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 15 Oct 2025 at 10:07:58 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Settlements#North Macedonia
Info All by me. -- Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 10:07, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 10:07, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 00:11, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
Support A beautiful little village Cmao20 (talk) 00:12, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
Support Perfect view. --Harmonide (talk) 22:01, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 05:10, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 08:35, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:15, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
Comment Very good in all respects, but I'd prefer a larger image so that I could look more closely at the details of the individual buildings like the mosque. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:29, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
- @Ikan Kekek: I've uploaded a version with higher resolution (12,000 x 8,000), which is accessible on this link (note that I've reverted to the original version as this one is 68 MB big and thereby difficult to load). --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 11:15, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
- Not difficult to load on my connection, and I like it and would support it. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:27, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
Done Re-uploaded. --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 04:45, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
- Not difficult to load on my connection, and I like it and would support it. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:27, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
- @Ikan Kekek: I've uploaded a version with higher resolution (12,000 x 8,000), which is accessible on this link (note that I've reverted to the original version as this one is 68 MB big and thereby difficult to load). --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 11:15, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 22:33, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 13:10, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
Support Yes, Kiril, this one works, nice compo Poco a poco (talk) 06:17, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
Support За тоа не можи да је отворим и прв пат гледам оти е во мала ресолуција. --Mile (talk) 09:10, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 15 Oct 2025 at 09:56:21 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings#France
Info created by AFBorchert – uploaded by AFBorchert – nominated by AFBorchert -- AFBorchert (talk) 09:56, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
Support -- AFBorchert (talk) 09:56, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
Support had my doubts about the off centred set up initially - Just out of curiosity what is causing the reddish hue? The windows are mainly green and blue and incandescent lights with a reddish hue a rarely chosen to illuminate a church or crypt. Virtual-Pano (talk) 11:21, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks for the review, Virtual-Pano. I haven't manually modified the white balance. This is a HDR created from 5 shots, combined in Lightroom. But the light was at least somewhat yellowish and the stones have a warm color. --AFBorchert (talk) 13:28, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
Support I do find that HDR tends to play with the white balance; compare File:Water's Edge Event Centre, Windsor, Ontario, 2025-07-02 01.jpg with File:Water's Edge Event Centre, Windsor, Ontario, 2025-07-02 05.jpg. That being said, the colours are pleasing, and they appear realistic. Not having been to the church, I cannot speak to accuracy. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 13:56, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
Support Cmao20 (talk) 15:08, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
Support Excellent and very beautiful. Colours appear completely natural to me (have not been there, but remember similar hues from other stone churches and crypts). – Aristeas (talk) 17:37, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
Support Poco a poco (talk) 18:40, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
Support I like this. I can almost feel and smell the air in this crypt. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:56, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 00:11, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
Support Very atmospheric. -- Radomianin (talk) 07:15, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 08:00, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
Strong support The just apparent symmetry of the image captivates the viewer's gaze, inviting them to linger over the details. As a viewer, you imagine yourself to be at the centre of the scene, but you are not. All in all, very well done. --Syntaxys (talk) 12:24, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:44, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:05, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
Support. heylenny (talk/edits) 00:22, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 08:36, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
Support --Harmonide (talk) 17:35, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 20:08, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 22:32, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 15 Oct 2025 at 07:05:12 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects#Books and Paper
Info created by Anonymous – uploaded by JayCubby – nominated by Inu06 -- Inu06 (talk) 07:05, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
Support One of the oldest manuscripts of the Quran-- Inu06 (talk) 07:05, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
Support--Peulle (talk) 08:51, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
Support Beautiful scan of an important manuscript. --AFBorchert (talk) 10:08, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
Support Cmao20 (talk) 12:18, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
Support and thanks for the nom. JayCubby (talk) 13:48, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
Support As a literature graduate who loved working with early printed materials, I think we need more philological FPs. The quality and rarity of this example more than makes up for the few technical deficiencies (softer on edges, parts of the folio cut off). — Chris Woodrich (talk) 14:01, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
- @Crisco 1492, I can loosen the crop if you'd like. Edge sharpening is beyond me (at least if you want it done well). JayCubby (talk) 15:16, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
- I'd personally go for a looser crop, yeah (I tend to do that with my loose-leaf scans), but in the end nothing is missing aside from the text itself, so it's a matter of taste. I'm good supporting either way. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 15:40, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
- @Crisco 1492, I can loosen the crop if you'd like. Edge sharpening is beyond me (at least if you want it done well). JayCubby (talk) 15:16, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 16:31, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
Support per AFBorchert. – Aristeas (talk) 17:35, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
Support per AFBorchert. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:58, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
Support I'm not nearly as fond of these types of images as I am of others...but wow, that's an amazing scan! --SHB2000 (talk) 00:12, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
Support A rare manuscript - historically profound and timeless. -- Radomianin (talk) 07:48, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 08:00, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:42, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 05:11, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 22:32, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 15 Oct 2025 at 05:20:22 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Settlements#Greece
Info created, uploaded & nominated by kallerna —kallerna (talk) 05:20, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
Support A high-altitude photograph of the Giosos Apostolidis Refuge on the rugged slopes of mythical Mount Olympus —kallerna (talk) 05:20, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
Support --XRay 💬 09:17, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
Support --AFBorchert (talk) 10:11, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 10:32, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
Support --Virtual-Pano (talk) 11:26, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
Support Well composed and beautiful in its starkness Cmao20 (talk) 12:18, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
Support Ermell (talk) 13:58, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 14:03, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
Support per Cmao20. – Aristeas (talk) 17:31, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 17:33, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
Support Poco a poco (talk) 18:40, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
Support per Cmao20, but I see what look like some very subtle halos above parts of both rocks, so kallerna, you might want to have a look. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:01, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 00:12, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
Support Lovely. Wolverine X-eye 07:20, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 07:41, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 07:59, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:40, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 17:42, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 05:12, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 08:36, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
Support --GRDN711 (talk) 16:53, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 22:32, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
Support --Argenberg (talk) 11:09, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
File:Deity performer.jpg, featured
Voting period ends on 15 Oct 2025 at 03:12:39 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People/Portrait#Men
Info created & uploaded by Mahesh P – nominated by iMahesh (talk) 03:12, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
Support -- iMahesh (talk) 03:12, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 10:04, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
Support --AFBorchert (talk) 10:13, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
Support --Bijay Chaurasia (talk) 10:27, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
Support Cmao20 (talk) 12:17, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 13:59, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 14:10, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
Support Stunning. Very good quality for a phone, looks natural and realistic. – Aristeas (talk) 14:19, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 17:34, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
Support per Aristeas. Great subject, and great details on him and his clothing. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:05, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
- Thank You!! Mpamidimarthi (talk) 13:41, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 00:12, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
Support --Mile (talk) 07:02, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 07:31, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
Support Striking composition and presence - expressive yet perfectly balanced; a captivating moment.-- Radomianin (talk) 07:39, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
- Thank You!! Mpamidimarthi (talk) 13:41, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:39, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
Support I wouldn't have guessed it was a phone picture! JayCubby (talk) 14:24, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
- Thank You Mpamidimarthi (talk) 13:41, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
Support Truly remarkable. --Harmonide (talk) 21:28, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
- Thank You!! Mpamidimarthi (talk) 13:42, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 05:13, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 08:37, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Jakubhal 07:24, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 22:31, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 14 Oct 2025 at 13:41:28 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Photo_techniques/Styles_and_Techniques#Minimalism
Info created and uploaded and nominated by XRay -- XRay 💬 13:41, 5 October 2025 (UTC)
Info The photo thrives on minimalism. The clouds accentuate the sky and emphasize the sign. The slightly slanted sign makes the photo appear more realistic and less artificial. And yes, I like minimalist photos. --XRay 💬 13:41, 5 October 2025 (UTC)
Support -- XRay 💬 13:41, 5 October 2025 (UTC)
Support Me too :) --Julesvernex2 (talk) 18:08, 5 October 2025 (UTC)
Support Me too ;–). And this is another excellent example. – Aristeas (talk) 18:36, 5 October 2025 (UTC)
Support Me three :) Cmao20 (talk) 00:50, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Minimalism doesn't automatically make a picture "full of interest", and unfortunately in this case the content appears quite unexceptional, in my view. Industrial white and blue signs in a landscape. As a typeface lover, I regret to find this letter L unappealing aesthetically, and the font for "FELD" and "STRANDKORBE" really too common. Thus I don't see why this photo would become "extraordinary" with a FP status Basile Morin (talk) 03:56, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
- Wouldn't a more interesting typeface make the photo less minimalist, by drawing away attention from the overall shapes and colours? When I first looked at this image, I focused on the meaning of the signs. After a translation revealed their mundane meaning about renting beach chairs, my mind was free to enjoy the rest of the composition --Julesvernex2 (talk) 06:46, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
- Just my 2 cents :-) Basile Morin (talk) 10:30, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
- I find your comment remarkable. I see the photo as a whole, while you focus on details that I find much less important. Of course, typography is important. When I typeset texts with LaTeX, I also have a different focus. Here I see a round and a square sign (a minor contrast) that appeals to the viewer. In my opinion, the text is irrelevant, but the simplicity of the sign fits well. --XRay 💬 09:22, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
- Basile is certainly right that just referring to minimalism is not enough, we also have to mention why exactly this photo is a successful example of minimalist photography. So my “me too” was a bit lazy, sorry. For me the appeal of this photo is (i) in the clear composition (vertically four stripes: ¼ blue sky, ½ sky with clouds and sign, ¼ ground with grass; horizontally clear asymmetrical division in just two parts by the sign); (ii) in the select colours which give a very harmonic impression; and (iii) in the contrast of the natural forms of the grass (complex, wild natural forms with linear, vertical tendency) and of the clouds (less complex, rounded natural forms with horizontal tendency) with the artificial, rigid shape of the man-made sign (elementary form, vertical tendency). The simple shapes of the letters, esp. of the prominent capital L, fit very well with the overall rather geometrical shape of the sign; if the L would use a more ornate typeface, this would not work as well. (Although a severe neoclassical roman type, best a Bauer Bodoni or Didot, would also give a nice contrast ;–). – Aristeas (talk) 10:49, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
- It's perhaps "cluttered minimalism". Because the blue sign (with icon) takes too much place. And because white foreground on white background makes the whole complicated. At the end, it's just a standard road sign
-- Basile Morin (talk) 11:27, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
- It's perhaps "cluttered minimalism". Because the blue sign (with icon) takes too much place. And because white foreground on white background makes the whole complicated. At the end, it's just a standard road sign
Support --Llez (talk) 10:03, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 14:15, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
Support per Aristeas's excellent explanation. JayCubby (talk) 15:41, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
Support I think I like the simplistic or minimalistic nature of this photograph. Wolverine X-eye 16:31, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Sorry, the composition is lost on me. I'd like it without the leftmost third or so of the photo, such that we saw the clouds beyond the sign and not the section with just clouds, sky and grass. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:11, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 00:13, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
Support Basile is right that minimalism must be earned - and this image does. Its quiet balance, unpretentious design, and calm geometry turn the ordinary into something quietly remarkable. -- Radomianin (talk) 07:35, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:36, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 17:40, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
Support heylenny (talk/edits) 00:25, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
Oppose I like this kind of shots, for a change but I'm getting saturated, I believe. Poco a poco (talk) 18:03, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 13 Oct 2025 at 16:32:07 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical/People#1970-1979
Info created by Heinrich Klaffs – uploaded by Janericloebe – nominated by Groupir ! -- Groupir ! (talk) 16:32, 4 October 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Groupir ! (talk) 16:32, 4 October 2025 (UTC)
Comment Please remove the while line at the upper right. Yann (talk) 08:36, 5 October 2025 (UTC)
Done, thank you. --Groupir ! (talk) 08:53, 5 October 2025 (UTC)
Weak support It's very small but it unquestionably has a great atmosphere Cmao20 (talk) 11:52, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
Weak support The halo lighting is great. – Aristeas (talk) 13:56, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
Support as per Aristeas. -- Radomianin (talk) 07:19, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:28, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
Support --Harmonide (talk) 22:08, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 13:31, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
Support-- E.IMANCOMMONS 21:19, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 13 Oct 2025 at 13:27:22 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical/People#1930-1939
Info created by unknown photographer – uploaded by Giovanni Cardinali – nominated by Giovanni Cardinali -- Giovanni Cardinali (talk) 13:27, 4 October 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Giovanni Cardinali (talk) 13:27, 4 October 2025 (UTC)
Support Cmao20 (talk) 13:15, 5 October 2025 (UTC)
Support Nice one, and historically important (see Bioscop). – Aristeas (talk) 10:34, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
Support per Aristeas. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:46, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
Support heylenny (talk/edits) 00:26, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 04:28, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:17, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 13 Oct 2025 at 13:10:01 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious_buildings#Germany
Info created by Plozessor – uploaded by Plozessor – nominated by Plozessor -- Plozessor (talk) 13:10, 4 October 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Plozessor (talk) 13:10, 4 October 2025 (UTC)
Support I really like the composition and interplay between bright and dark and the golden colors. —Tuxyso (talk) 19:34, 4 October 2025 (UTC)
Support Lovely place and I like the choice to photograph it off-centre in this case - a careful composition that shows all the most important features of the chapel Cmao20 (talk) 13:15, 5 October 2025 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 04:10, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
Support Such little chapels are notoriously difficult for the photographer, very well done. – Aristeas (talk) 10:19, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
Support Symmetrical might have been nicer, but this way is also fine for me.--Famberhorst (talk) 15:55, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
Support heylenny (talk/edits) 00:26, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 08:41, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 12 Oct 2025 at 06:37:42 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Germany#Rhineland-Palatinate
Info all by imehling -- imehling (talk) 06:37, 3 October 2025 (UTC)
Support -- imehling (talk) 06:37, 3 October 2025 (UTC)
Support Cmao20 (talk) 17:57, 3 October 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Sorry, the compo is not working for me and the wow factor is very limited Poco a poco (talk) 19:53, 3 October 2025 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 13:33, 5 October 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Very high resolution but unexceptional landscape, in my opinion -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:05, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
Support It's legitimate to find the wow factor limited in this composition, but I think it's pleasant and complex enough and has excellent details, and I hope I don't offend by comparing it favorably to the minimalist composition that's gotten so much support above. I believe I see what you saw in this motif. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:00, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
Support per Ikan Kekek--Famberhorst (talk) 15:52, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Sorry, I don't see what is remarkable in this image. --Harmonide (talk) 22:14, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
Support heylenny (talk/edits) 00:28, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:18, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Sorry, agree with Basile, Poco, Harmonide - landscape composition is not exceptional. --GRDN711 (talk) 17:03, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
Oppose per others. --Yann (talk) 10:30, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
Support I like how the trees seem to raise their branches with very different gestures, like actors in a crowded dramatic scene. – Aristeas (talk) 18:03, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 11 Oct 2025 at 21:28:23 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera/Nymphalidae#Genus_:_Araschnia
Info created, uploaded by and nominated by FlocciNivis -- FlocciNivis (talk) 21:28, 2 October 2025 (UTC)
Support -- FlocciNivis (talk) 21:28, 2 October 2025 (UTC)
Support. ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕️ 02:54, 3 October 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 09:16, 3 October 2025 (UTC)
Support Delicate and lovely Cmao20 (talk) 17:55, 3 October 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Considering the butterfly the main element of the picture the level of detail is too low. A big part of the image (background) is not adding anything up IMHO Poco a poco (talk) 19:55, 3 October 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Too few details and too much background for a FP. Sorry.--Ermell (talk) 08:01, 4 October 2025 (UTC)
Weak oppose per ermell. --SHB2000 (talk) 00:39, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
Support --Harmonide (talk) 22:26, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
Support heylenny (talk/edits) 00:32, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 11 Oct 2025 at 16:35:30 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects#Books and Paper
Info created by Marie-Lan Nguyen – uploaded by Jastrow – nominated by Inu06 -- Inu06 (talk) 16:35, 2 October 2025 (UTC)
Support Unique image of a folio from the 9th–10th century Blue Quran manuscript, with high encyclopedic value, wide wiki usage, and already featured on Arabic Wikipedia -- Inu06 (talk) 16:35, 2 October 2025 (UTC)
Support Interesting Cmao20 (talk) 17:14, 2 October 2025 (UTC)
Oppose The picture is certainly historically significant but I cannot find the conditions for FP qualification here--Ermell (talk) 06:40, 3 October 2025 (UTC)
Support Good reproduction of an example of classic Kufic calligraphy; the (fragmentary) Blue Quran is one of the most famous Islamic manuscripts because of the exquisite indigo/gold coloring. – Aristeas (talk) 08:44, 4 October 2025 (UTC)
Support --Thi (talk) 18:22, 4 October 2025 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 08:39, 5 October 2025 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 09:30, 5 October 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 08:58, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 14:31, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
Oppose. I agree with Ermell. heylenny (talk/edits) 00:31, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
Oppose per Ermell. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:35, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
File:Sunset at Ponta da Barra.jpg, not featured
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Oct 2025 at 03:08:19 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Natural phenomena/Weather#Sun
Info created by Felipe Valduga – uploaded and nominated by Heylenny -- heylenny (talk/edits) 03:08, 2 October 2025 (UTC)
Support -- heylenny (talk/edits) 03:08, 2 October 2025 (UTC)
Weak oppose This picture may do well at FPC but I'll be honest, it isn't for me. I think sunsets are almost all pretty but they are also quite common so they need something to elevate them to the status of extraordinary, and for me that is missing here. The colours of the light trail are very orange, almost to the point of blowing the red channel, and that makes me wonder if the saturation has gone a bit overboard in general. I am also not really a fan of blurry long-exposure water, I know it's a technique that is fashionable but it just always looks very similar and kind of artificial to me. Quality is fine. Cmao20 (talk) 17:13, 2 October 2025 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 08:40, 5 October 2025 (UTC)
Support Clean, cold and open, yet detailed. Forefront area adds to the depth and character. --Paracel63 (talk) 09:08, 5 October 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Yes, it's overprocessed also in my view -- Basile Morin (talk) 09:14, 5 October 2025 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 09:30, 5 October 2025 (UTC)
Support The smooth surface of the water hills is fascinating.--AM (talk) 11:51, 5 October 2025 (UTC)
Oppose I agree with Cmao20 that this photo is not special enough to feature. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:14, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
Timetable (day 5 after nomination)
Mon 06 Oct → Sat 11 Oct Tue 07 Oct → Sun 12 Oct Wed 08 Oct → Mon 13 Oct Thu 09 Oct → Tue 14 Oct Fri 10 Oct → Wed 15 Oct Sat 11 Oct → Thu 16 Oct
Timetable (day 9 after nomination, last day of voting)
Thu 02 Oct → Sat 11 Oct Fri 03 Oct → Sun 12 Oct Sat 04 Oct → Mon 13 Oct Sun 05 Oct → Tue 14 Oct Mon 06 Oct → Wed 15 Oct Tue 07 Oct → Thu 16 Oct Wed 08 Oct → Fri 17 Oct Thu 09 Oct → Sat 18 Oct Fri 10 Oct → Sun 19 Oct Sat 11 Oct → Mon 20 Oct
Closing a featured picture promotion request
The bot
Note that the description below is for manual closure, this is mostly not needed anymore as there exists a bot (FPCBot) that counts the votes and handles the process below. However after the bot has counted the votes a manual review step is used to make sure the count is correct before the bot again picks up the work.
Manual procedure
Any experienced user may close requests.
- In Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list click on the title/link of the candidate image, then [edit].
Add the result of the voting at the bottom (on a new line with a space first)
(for example see Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:The Bridge (August 2013).jpg). See also {{FPC-results-reviewed}}.
{{FPC-results-reviewed|support=x|oppose=x|neutral=x|featured=("yes" or "no")|gallery=xxx (leave blank if "featured=no")|sig=~~~~}} - Also edit the title of the candidate image template and add after the image tag featured or not featured – for example:
=== [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]] ===
becomes
=== [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]], featured === - Save your edit.
- If it is featured:
- Add the picture to the list of the four most recently featured pictures of an appropriate gallery of Commons:Featured pictures, list as the first one and delete the last one, so that the number is four again.
- Also add the picture to the appropriate gallery and section of Commons:Featured pictures, list. Click on the most appropriate link beneath where you just added it as one of the four images. An image should only appear ONE time in the galleries. After a successful nomination, the image can be placed in several of the Featured pictures categories.
- Add the template {{Assessments|featured=1}} to the image description page.
- If it was an alternative image or part of a set nomination, use the com-nom parameter. For example, if File:Foo.jpg was promoted at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Bar.jpg, use {{Assessments|featured=1|com-nom=Bar.jpg}}
- If the image is already featured on another Wikipedia, just add featured=1 to the Assessments template. For instance {{Assessments|enwiki=1}} becomes {{Assessments|enwiki=1|featured=1}}
- Add the picture to the chronological list of featured pictures. Put it in the gallery using this format: File:xxxxx.jpg|# '''Headline'''<br>created by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]], uploaded by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]], nominated by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]]
- The # should be replaced by 1 for the first image nominated that month, and counts up after that. Have a look at the other noms on that page for examples.
- You may simplify this if multiple things were done by the same user. E.g.: File:xxxxx.jpg|# '''Headline'''<br>created, uploaded, and nominated by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]]
- Add == FP promotion ==
{{FPpromotion|File:XXXXX.jpg}} to the talk page of the nominator. For set nominations, use:
== Set Promoted to FP ==
<gallery>
File:XXXXXX.jpg
File:XXXXXX.jpg
</gallery>
{{FPpromotionSet2|YYYYY}}, using the names of the set files instead of the XXXXXX and the title of the set instead of YYYYY. - Add == FP promotion ==
{{FPpromotedUploader|File:XXXXX.jpg}} to the talk page of the user who has uploaded the image, if that user is not the same as the nominator. - Add == FP promotion ==
{{FPpromotedCreator|File:XXXXX.jpg}} to the talk page of the creator, if the author is a different Commons user than nominator and uploader.
- As the last step (whether the image is featured or not; including {{FPX}}ed, {{FPD}}ed and withdrawn nominations), open Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list, click on [edit], and find the transclusion of the nomination you've just finished closing. It will be of the form:
{{Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:XXXXX.jpg}}
Copy it to the bottom of Commons:Featured picture candidates/Log/October 2025), save that page, and remove it from the candidate list.
Closing a delisting request
- In Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list click on the title/link of the candidate image, then [edit].
Add the result of the voting at the bottom (on a new line):
{{FPC-delist-results-reviewed|delist=x|keep=x|neutral=x|delisted=yes/no|sig=~~~~}}
(for example see Commons:Featured picture candidates/removal/File:Ensifera ensifera (22271195865).jpg) - Also edit the title of the delisting candidate image template and add after the image tag
delisted or not delisted
For example:
=== [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]] === becomes === [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]], delisted === - Move the actual template from Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list to the bottom of the actual month page on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Log/October 2025.
- If the outcome was not delisted, stop here. If it is delisted:
- Remove the picture from Commons:Featured pictures, list and any subpages.
- Edit the picture's description as follows:
- In the {{Assessments}} template on the image description page, change featured=1 to featured=2 (do not change anything related to its status in other featured picture processes). If the image description page uses the old {{Featured picture}} template, replace it with {{Assessments|featured=2}}.
- Remove the image from all categories beginning with "Featured [pictures]" (example: Featured night photography, Featured pictures from Wiki Loves Monuments 2016, Featured pictures of Paris).
- Remove the "Commons quality assessment" claim (P6731) "Wikimedia Commons featured picture" from the picture's Structured data.
- Add a delisting-comment to the original entry in chronological list of featured pictures in bold-face, e. g. delisted 2007-07-19 (1-6) with (1-6) meaning 1 keep and 6 delist votes (change as appropriate). The picture must not be removed from the chronological list.
- If this is a Delist and Replace, the delisting and promotion must both be done manually. To do the promotion, follow the steps in the above section. Note that the assessment tag on the file page and the promotion tag on the nominator's talk page won't pick up the /replace subpage that these nominations use.
Manual archiving of a withdrawn nomination
- In Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list click on the title/link of the candidate image, then [edit].
In the occasion that the FPCbot will not mark withdrawn nominations with a "to be reviewed" template and put them in Category:Featured picture candidates awaiting closure review just like if they were on the usual list, put the following "no" template:{{FPC-results-reviewed|support=X|oppose=X|neutral=X|featured=no|gallery=|sig=--~~~~}}
- Also edit the title of the candidate image template and add after the image tag
not featured
For example:
=== [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]] ===
becomes
=== [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]], not featured === - Save your edit.
- Open Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list, click on [edit], and find the transclusion of the nomination. It will be of the form:
{{Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:XXXXX.jpg}}
Copy it to the bottom of Commons:Featured picture candidates/Log/October 2025), save that page, and remove it from the candidate list.